0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Interfacial Fluid Mechanics and Pressure Prediction in Chemical Mechanical Polishing

[+] Author and Article Information
Lei Shan, Joseph Levert, Lorne Meade, Steven Danyluk

The George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0405

John Tichy

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Aeronautical Engineering and Mechanics, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180-3590

J. Tribol 122(3), 539-543 (Jul 06, 1999) (5 pages) doi:10.1115/1.555398 History: Received March 16, 1999; Revised July 06, 1999
Copyright © 2000 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Experimental setup and schematic diagram of both top and side view of the pressure sampling fixture
Grahic Jump Location
Pressure variation versus data sampling time, for a pad roughness of 5 μm, velocity of 0.16 m/s, and 20 kPa normal load
Grahic Jump Location
Pressure data sampling and interfacial pressure mapping, for a sample loaded at 20 kPa and a pad roughness of 5 μm, and 0.43 m/s velocity
Grahic Jump Location
Interfacial fluid pressure distribution versus velocity, for a 20 kPa normal load and 5 μm pad roughness
Grahic Jump Location
Fluid pressure (the average of hole 6, 7, and 8) versus velocity, for a sample loaded at 20 kPa for two pad roughness
Grahic Jump Location
The effect of the unit normal load on the interfacial fluid pressure for a velocity of 0.7 m/s and unit normal load of 20 kPa
Grahic Jump Location
Schematic diagram of the physical system (with compressed asperities), contact stress, and predicted pressure distribution
Grahic Jump Location
A high resolution surface profile of polishing pad (Ra=5 μm) obtained with HRP-100 contact profiler
Grahic Jump Location
Contact stress σ(x) versus location x, for a sample loaded at 20 kPa and an average fluid pressure of −13.4 kPa
Grahic Jump Location
Film thickness h(x) versus location x, for a pad of an average surface roughness of 5 μm
Grahic Jump Location
Fluid pressure p(x) versus location x. A comparison of model (dash line) and measurement (solid line), at a velocity of 0.43 m/s.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In