0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Use of Electrostatic Charge Monitoring for Early Detection of Adhesive Wear in Oil Lubricated Contacts

[+] Author and Article Information
S. Morris, R. J. K. Wood, T. J. Harvey

School of Engineering Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom

H. E. G. Powrie

Stewart Hughes Limited, School Lane, Eastleigh, Hampshire, SO53 4YG, United Kingdom

J. Tribol 124(2), 288-296 (Jun 19, 2001) (9 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1398293 History: Received February 27, 2001; Revised June 19, 2001
Copyright © 2002 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Block diagram of the instrumentation used
Grahic Jump Location
Sensor 1 signal average from a blank B. S. 534A99 disc
Grahic Jump Location
Sensor 1 and sensor 2 signal average from B. S. 534A99 disc with copper insert
Grahic Jump Location
The schematic representation of different lubrication and adhesive wear regimes
Grahic Jump Location
(a) Schematic diagram of the non-contact test setup; (b) relative position of sensors; and (c) plan view of disc with an insert.
Grahic Jump Location
Schematic diagram of the scuffing test setup and relative position of sensors
Grahic Jump Location
Schematic diagram of charge generation
Grahic Jump Location
Conceptual view of triboemission
Grahic Jump Location
Sensor 1 signal average from B. S. 534A99 disc with aluminum insert
Grahic Jump Location
Sensor 1 signal averages no. 77 and 78 from mineral base oil scuff test positive peaks caused by larger oil droplets on the disc surface which have moved position between the averages
Grahic Jump Location
(a) Sensor 1 signal averages no. 60 and 180 from mineral base oil scuff test. Average no. 60 is a baseline average similar to that shown in Fig. 8; and (b) difference between signal averages no. 60 and 180 mineral base oil scuff test highlighting peaks at 15 deg, 148 deg, 165 deg, 190 deg, 218 deg, 257 deg, 307 deg, and 356 deg and troughs at 50 deg and 85 deg.
Grahic Jump Location
Sensor 1 signal average from B. S. 534A99 disc with B. S. 534A99 insert
Grahic Jump Location
Sensor 1 signal average from B. S. 534A99 disc with carbon steel insert
Grahic Jump Location
(a) Sensor 1 signal averages no. 100 and 800 from fully formulated synthetic oil scuff test. Average no. 10 is a baseline average, similar to that shown in Fig. 8; and (b) difference between signal averages no. 100 and 800 formulated synthetic oil scuff test highlighting troughs at 107 deg, 153 deg, 217 deg, 312 deg, and 332 deg.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In