Numerical Techniques for Computing Rotordynamic Properties of Mechanical Gas Face Seals

Brad A. Miller; Itzhak Green

doi:10.1115/1.1467635

Journal of Tribology | Volume 124 | Issue 4 | TECHNICAL PAPERS

< Previous Article Next Article >

TECHNICAL PAPERS

Numerical Techniques for Computing Rotordynamic Properties of Mechanical Gas Face Seals

Brad A. Miller and Itzhak Green

[+] Author and Article Information

Brad A. Miller

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, University of Missouri-Rolla, 1870 Miner Circle, Rolla, MO 65409-0050

Itzhak Green

George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0405

J. Tribol 124(4), 755-761 (Sep 24, 2002) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1467635 History: Received July 20, 2001; Revised December 27, 2001; Online September 24, 2002

Article

References

Figures

Tables

Citing Articles

Purchase this Content

$25.00

Purchase

Learn about subscription and purchase options

Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Malanoski, S. B., and Pan, C. H. T., 1965, “The Static and Dynamic Characteristics of the Spiral-Grooved Thrust Bearing,” ASME J. Basic Eng., 87, pp. 547–558.

Zirkelback, N., and San Andrès, L., 1999, “Effect of Frequency Excitation on Force Coefficients of Spiral Groove Gas Seals,” ASME J. Tribol., 121, pp. 853–863.

Zirkelback, N., 2000, “Parametric Study of Spiral Groove Gas Face Seals,” J. Tribol. Trans., 43, pp. 337–343.

Elrod, H. G., McCabe, J. T., and Chu, T. Y., 1967, “Determination of Gas-Bearing Stability by Response to a Step-Jump,” ASME J. Lubr. Technol., 89, pp. 493–498.

Miller, B., and Green, I., 2000, “The Dynamic Properties of Annular Gas Squeeze Film Dampers,” Tribol. Trans., 43, pp. 302–310.

Green, I., and Etsion, I., 1985, “Stability Threshold and Steady-State Response of Noncontacting Coned-Face Seals,” ASLE Trans., 28, pp. 449–460.

Gross, W. A., 1980, Fluid Film Lubrication, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

Miller, B., and Green, I., 1997, “On the Stability of Gas Lubricated Triboelements Using the Step Jump Method,” ASME J. Tribol., 119, pp. 193–199.

Miller, B., and Green, I., 2001, “Numerical Formulation for the Dynamic Analysis of Spiral-Grooved Gas Face Seals,” ASME J. Tribol., 123, pp. 395–403.

Ono, K., 1975, “Dynamic Characteristics of Air-Lubricated Slider Bearing for Noncontact Magnetic Recording,” ASME J. Lubr. Technol., 97, pp. 250–260.

Figures

Schematic of a noncontacting mechanical gas face seal

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Mechanical face seal kinematic model

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Comparison of loss Moduli for the direct axial frequency responses, G_{F_Z,Z}, for Seal Type II

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Comparison of storage Moduli for the direct axial frequency responses, G_{F_Z,Z}, for Seal Type II

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

(a) Direct tilt frequency responses, G_{M_X,γ_X} and G_{M_Y,γ_Y}, for Seal Type I; and (b) cross-coupled tilt frequency responses, G_{M_Y,γ_X} and −G_{M_X,γ_Y}, for Seal Type I

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Direct axial frequency responses, G_{F_Z,Z}, for Seal Type I

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

(a) Direct tilt step responses, k_{M_X,γ_X}(t) and k_{M_Y,γ_Y}(t), for Seal Type I; and (b) cross-coupled tilt step responses, k_{M_Y,γ_X}(t) and −k_{M_X,γ_Y}(t), for Seal Type I

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Direct axial step responses, k_{F_Z,Z}(t), for Seal Type I

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Tables

Errata

Web of Science® Times Cited: 11

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sections
PDF
Email

You must be logged in as an individual user to share content.

Return to: Numerical Techniques for Computing Rotordynamic Properties of Mechanical Gas Face Seals

Copyright in the material you requested is held by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (unless otherwise noted). This email ability is provided as a courtesy, and by using it you agree that you are requesting the material solely for personal, non-commercial use, and that it is subject to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers' Terms of Use. The information provided in order to email this topic will not be used to send unsolicited email, nor will it be furnished to third parties. Please refer to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers' Privacy Policy for further information.
Share
Get Citation

Miller BA, Green I. Numerical Techniques for Computing Rotordynamic Properties of Mechanical Gas Face Seals. ASME. J. Tribol. 2002;124(4):755-761. doi:10.1115/1.1467635.

Download citation file:

RIS (Zotero)

EndNote

BibTex

Medlars

ProCite

RefWorks

Reference Manager

© Copyright
Get Alerts

Processing your request... Please Wait.

Numerical Techniques for Computing Rotordynamic Properties of Mechanical Gas Face Seals

References

Figures

Schematic of a noncontacting mechanical gas face seal

Mechanical face seal kinematic model

Comparison of loss Moduli for the direct axial frequency responses, G_{F_Z,Z}, for Seal Type II

Comparison of storage Moduli for the direct axial frequency responses, G_{F_Z,Z}, for Seal Type II

(a) Direct tilt frequency responses, G_{M_X,γ_X} and G_{M_Y,γ_Y}, for Seal Type I; and (b) cross-coupled tilt frequency responses, G_{M_Y,γ_X} and −G_{M_X,γ_Y}, for Seal Type I

Direct axial frequency responses, G_{F_Z,Z}, for Seal Type I

(a) Direct tilt step responses, k_{M_X,γ_X}(t) and k_{M_Y,γ_Y}(t), for Seal Type I; and (b) cross-coupled tilt step responses, k_{M_Y,γ_X}(t) and −k_{M_X,γ_Y}(t), for Seal Type I

Direct axial step responses, k_{F_Z,Z}(t), for Seal Type I

Tables

Errata

Related Content

Journals

Conference Proceedings

eBooks

Numerical Techniques for Computing Rotordynamic Properties of Mechanical Gas Face Seals

References

Figures

Schematic of a noncontacting mechanical gas face seal

Mechanical face seal kinematic model

Comparison of loss Moduli for the direct axial frequency responses, GFZ,Z, for Seal Type II

Comparison of storage Moduli for the direct axial frequency responses, GFZ,Z, for Seal Type II

(a) Direct tilt frequency responses, GMX,γX and GMY,γY, for Seal Type I; and (b) cross-coupled tilt frequency responses, GMY,γX and −GMX,γY, for Seal Type I

Direct axial frequency responses, GFZ,Z, for Seal Type I

(a) Direct tilt step responses, kMX,γX(t) and kMY,γY(t), for Seal Type I; and (b) cross-coupled tilt step responses, kMY,γX(t) and −kMX,γY(t), for Seal Type I

Direct axial step responses, kFZ,Z(t), for Seal Type I

Tables

Errata

Related Content

Journals

Conference Proceedings

eBooks

Comparison of loss Moduli for the direct axial frequency responses, G_{F_Z,Z}, for Seal Type II

Comparison of storage Moduli for the direct axial frequency responses, G_{F_Z,Z}, for Seal Type II

(a) Direct tilt frequency responses, G_{M_X,γ_X} and G_{M_Y,γ_Y}, for Seal Type I; and (b) cross-coupled tilt frequency responses, G_{M_Y,γ_X} and −G_{M_X,γ_Y}, for Seal Type I

Direct axial frequency responses, G_{F_Z,Z}, for Seal Type I

(a) Direct tilt step responses, k_{M_X,γ_X}(t) and k_{M_Y,γ_Y}(t), for Seal Type I; and (b) cross-coupled tilt step responses, k_{M_Y,γ_X}(t) and −k_{M_X,γ_Y}(t), for Seal Type I

Direct axial step responses, k_{F_Z,Z}(t), for Seal Type I