0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Manufacturing Effects in Microfabricated Gas Bearings: Axially Varying Clearance

[+] Author and Article Information
E. S. Piekos

Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139

K. S. Breuer

Brown University, Division of Engineering, Box D, 182 Hope Street, Providence, RI 02912

J. Tribol 124(4), 815-821 (Sep 24, 2002) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1430672 History: Received April 06, 2000; Revised May 22, 2001; Online September 24, 2002
Copyright © 2002 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Journal bearing cross-section with relevant dimensions noted. The journal (inner member) is rotating clockwise while the bearing (outer member) is stationary. The bearing has length L measured perpendicular to the page.
Grahic Jump Location
Scanning electron micrographs showing bow and taper in etched channels 5. Figures courtesy A. Ayón: (a) bow; and (b) taper.
Grahic Jump Location
Normalized pressure distributions for constant-clearance, tapered, and bowed bearings. In all cases, L/D=0.075, Λ=5, and ε=0.85: (a) constant-clearance, (b) 25 percent bow, and (c) 25 percent taper.
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of results for tapered bearings of various L/D, ε, and Δc with estimates computed from constant-clearance data using Eq. 3: (a) load parameter and (b) attitude angle.
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of results for bowed bearings of various L/D, ε, and Δc with estimates computed from constant-clearance data using Eq. 3: (a) load parameter and (b) attitude angle.
Grahic Jump Location
Percent change in steady-state parameters when 25 percent taper is added to an L/D=0.075 journal bearing
Grahic Jump Location
Percent change in steady-state parameters when 25 percent bow is added to an L/D=0.075 journal bearing
Grahic Jump Location
Effect of clearance bow and taper on stability boundaries for L/D=0.075 bearings with M̄=0.5: (a) tapered clearance and (b) bowed clearance.
Grahic Jump Location
Effect of bow and taper on required load: (a) tapered clearance and (b) bowed clearance.
Grahic Jump Location
Effect of increasing levels of taper on εmin at three values of Λ for an L/D=0.075 bearing with M̄=0.5
Grahic Jump Location
Effect of increasing levels of taper on εmin at three values of Λ for an L/D=0.15 bearing with M̄=0.5
Grahic Jump Location
Effect of increasing levels of taper on εmin in an L/D=0.15 bearing at Λ=5 for three values of M̄
Grahic Jump Location
Estimation of taper effect on minimum stable eccentricity using Eq. 3 with β=0.45
Grahic Jump Location
Estimation of taper effect on minimum stable load using Eq. 3 with β=0.45

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In