The Evolution of Geometry for a Wearing Circular Cam: Analytical and Computer Simulation With Comparison to Experiment

[+] Author and Article Information
D. J. Dickrell, W. G. Sawyer

University of Florida, Mechanical Engineering Department, Gainesville, FL 32611

D. B. Dooner

University of Puerto Rico, Mechanical Engineering Department, Mayaguez, PR 00681-9045

J. Tribol 125(1), 187-192 (Dec 31, 2002) (6 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1504092 History: Received February 07, 2002; Revised June 26, 2002; Online December 31, 2002
Copyright © 2003 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Podra,  P., and Andersson,  S., 1999, “Simulating Sliding Wear With Finite Element Method,” Tribol. Int., 32, pp. 71–81.
Blanchet,  T. A., 1997, “The Interaction of Wear and Dynamics of a Simple Mechanism,” ASME J. Tribol., 119, pp. 597–599.
Sawyer,  W. G., 2001, “Wear Predictions for a Simple-Cam Including the Coupled Evolution of Wear and Load,” Lubr. Eng., pp. 31–36.
Sawyer, W. G., Diaz, K. I., Hamilton, M. A., and Micklos, B., 2001, “Evaluation of an Analytical Model for the Evolution of Wear and Load in a Scotch-Yoke Mechanism,” ASME J. Tribol., submitted to the Journal of Tribology.
Dinc,  O. S., Cromer,  R., and Calabrese,  S. J., 1995, “Redesigning Mechanical Systems for Low Wear Using System Dynamics Modeling,” ASME J. Tribol., 35, pp. 1–8.


Grahic Jump Location
Schematic of the cam follower experimental test rig. The two follower configuration gives 2 cycles per cam revolution.
Grahic Jump Location
Schematic and nomenclature for the simple eccentrically mounted circular cam
Grahic Jump Location
Illustration of two configurations of interest for the analytical modeling (a) wear proceeds directly along the cam radius, and (b) wear proceeds along the cam radius and the eccentricity vector
Grahic Jump Location
Schematic and nomenclature for the computer simulation
Grahic Jump Location
A flowchart for the computer simulation
Grahic Jump Location
Error estimation using a wear-rate 10,000x greater than the experimentally determined value as a function of number of cycles
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison between the measured (crosses), analytical predictions (curve), and the computer simulation (○) for (a) the average radius of curvature, and (b) the cam eccentricity
Grahic Jump Location
Comparisons between the measured, analytical, and computer simulation for the cam shape
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison between the extrapolated shape from cycle 1 and the measured shape




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In