Analysis of Contact Mechanics for Rotor-Bristle Interference of Brush Seal

[+] Author and Article Information
R. J. Stango

Deburring and Surface Finishing Research Laboratory, Marquette University, 1515 W. Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53233

H. Zhao

Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI 53233

C. Y. Shia

YUN Technologies, Germantown, WI

J. Tribol 125(2), 414-421 (Mar 19, 2003) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1510879 History: Received February 14, 2002; Revised July 02, 2002; Online March 19, 2003
Copyright © 2003 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Basu,  P., Datta,  A., Loewenthal,  R., Short,  J., and Johnson,  R., 1994, “Hysteresis and Bristle Stiffening Effects in Brush Seals,” J. Propul. Power, 10(4), pp. 569–575.
Sharatchandra,  M. C., and Rhode,  D. L., 1996, “Computed Effects of Rotor-induced Swirl on Brush Seal Performance: Part 2—Bristle Force Analysis,” ASME J. Tribol., 118, pp. 920–926.
Aksit,  M. F., and Tichy,  J. A., 1998, “Wear of Brush Seals: Background and New Modeling Approach,” Tribol. Trans., 41(3), pp. 368–374.
Turner,  M. T., Chew,  J. W., and Long,  C. A., 1998, “Experimental Investigation and Mathematical Modeling of Clearance Brush Seals,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 120, pp. 573–579.
Chen,  L. H., Wood,  P. E., Jones,  T. V., and Chew,  J. W., 1999, “An Iterative CFD and Mechanical Brush Seal Model and Comparison with Experimental Results,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 121, pp. 656–662.
Howell,  P. D., and Lattimer,  T. R. B., 1999, “Modelling Bristle Bending in Brush Seals,” Math. Engrg. Ind., 7 (3), pp. 349–359.
Stango,  R. J., Heinrich,  S. M., and Shia,  C. Y., 1989, “Analysis of Constrained Filament Deformation and Stiffness Properties of Brushes,” ASME J. Ind., 111(3), pp. 238–243.
Stango,  R. J., and Shia,  C. Y., 1994, “On the Frictional Response of Circular Filamentary Brush in Contact with Planar Workpart,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 34(4), pp. 573–589.
Schlumberger, J. A., Proctor, M. P., and Hendricks, R. C., 1991, “Eccentricity Effects on Leakage of a Brush Seal at Low Speeds,” NASA report no. TM-105141; also presented at the WAM, ASME, Atlanta, GA, 1991.
Budynas, R. G., 1999, Advanced Strength and Applied Elasticity, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 152–156.


Grahic Jump Location
(a) Front view of brush seal depicting force system exerted by shaft onto bristle tip due to diametral interference, (b) section view of annular front and back plate that constrain bristle pack, (c) depiction of hypothetical free-body diagram in x-y plane, and (d) geometry of deformed bristle illustrating length coordinate and fiber slope in local frame of reference.
Grahic Jump Location
(a) experimental system used for measurement of bristle tip forces Fn and Fs, (b) force data acquired over 6 sec interval for normal force Fn (solid line) and shear force Fs (dashed line), and (c) comparison of normal force Fn based upon mechanics approach (square) and experimentation (diamond).
Grahic Jump Location
(a) Relationship between dimensionless force and dimensionless penetration depth for lay angles of 30, 45, and 60 deg. Shaded region corresponds to range of feasible eccentricities. Open circles denote upper bound for validity of linear (i.e., small displacement) beam theory for each lay angle. (Results shown are for frictionless contact with Rs/H*=15), and (b) numerical solution for bristle tip normal force based upon actual brush seal dimensions reported in Ref. 9.
Grahic Jump Location
Relationship between dimensionless force and dimensionless penetration depth for shaft/seal configurations Rs/H*=10, 15, and 50 (results shown are for frictionless contact and 45 deg lay angle)
Grahic Jump Location
Relationship between dimensionless force and dimensionless penetration depth for friction coefficient 0, 0.2, and 0.6. (Results shown are for 45 deg lay angle, and Rs/H*=15).
Grahic Jump Location
(a) Equilibrium position of bristle tip on rotor surface at point A in absence of friction, and (b) inclusion of friction gives rise to shear force Fs=μFn, and revised equilibrium position of bristle tip toward point C on rotor.
Grahic Jump Location
Relationship between bristle stress and bristle/rotor interference for lay angles 30, 45, and 60 deg. (Results shown are for frictionless contact with Rs/H*=15).
Grahic Jump Location
Outline of computational algorithm developed and used for obtaining convergent solutions to governing nonlinear differential equation (Eq. 6).




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In