0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Effects of Thermal Conductivity of Contacting Surfaces on Point EHL Contacts

[+] Author and Article Information
M. Kaneta

Department of Mechanical and Control Engineering, Kyushu Institute of Technology, Kitakyushu 804-8550, Japan

P. Yang

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Qingdao Institute of Architecture and Engineering, Qingdao 266033, China

J. Tribol 125(4), 731-738 (Sep 25, 2003) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1540121 History: Received July 02, 2002; Revised November 05, 2002; Online September 25, 2003
Copyright © 2003 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of experimental and numerical results: ue=0.36 m/s, pH=0.54 GPa, W=2.1×10−6; Experiment: t0=21°C,U=2.9×10−10,G=2778; Simulation: t0=20°C,U=3.2×10−10,G=2812
Grahic Jump Location
Numerical results; ue=0.8 m/s, U=7.1×10−10,G=2812,W=2.1×10−6
Grahic Jump Location
Velocity distributions across the film at various positions corresponding to the numerical cases of ∑=−1 and ∑=1 in Fig. 1
Grahic Jump Location
Numerical results for the virtual steel-actual glass contact; ue=0.8 m/s, U=7.1×10−10,G=2812,W=2.1×10−6
Grahic Jump Location
Numerical results for the virtual glass-actual steel contact; ue=0.8 m/s, U=7.1×10−10,G=2812,W=2.1×10−6
Grahic Jump Location
Velocity distributions across the film at various positions corresponding to the cases of ∑=1 in Figs. 4 and 5: (a) Virtual steel-actual glass contact; and (b) virtual glass-actual steel contact
Grahic Jump Location
Numerical results at a heavy load for the virtual steel-actual glass contact; ue=0.8 m/s, pH=1.0 GPa, U=7.1×10−10,G=2812,W=1.3×10−5
Grahic Jump Location
Numerical results at a heavy load for the virtual glass-actual steel contact; ue=0.8 m/s, pH=1.0 GPa, U=7.1×10−10,G=2812,W=1.3×10−5
Grahic Jump Location
Numerical results for the case shown in Fig. 4(a) but the compression work is not considered: ∑=0, ue=0.8 m/s, U=7.1×10−10,G=2812,W=2.1×10−6
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of middle layer temperatures obtained for: (a) the full solution (Fig. 4(a)); and (b) the solution neglecting the compression work (Fig. 9)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In