0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Combining and Contacting of Two Rough Surfaces with Asymmetric Distribution of Asperity Heights

[+] Author and Article Information
Ning Yu, Andreas A. Polycarpou

Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA

J. Tribol 126(2), 225-232 (Apr 19, 2004) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1614822 History: Received March 18, 2002; Revised July 29, 2003; Online April 19, 2004
Copyright © 2004 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Coulomb, C. A., 1785, “Théorie des Machines Simples, en ayant regard au Frottement de leurs Parties, et a la Roideur dews Cordages,” Mem. Math. Phys., X, Paris, pp. 161–342.
Abbott,  E. J., and Firestone,  F. A., 1933, “Specifying Surface Quality—A Method Based on Accurate Measurement and Comparison,” ASME Mech. Eng., 55, pp. 569–572.
Liu,  G., Wang,  Q. J., and Lin,  C., 1999, “A Survey of Current Models for Simulating the Contact between Rough Surfaces,” STLE Tribol. Trans., 42, pp. 581–591.
Bhushan,  B., 1996, “Contact Mechanics of Rough Surfaces in Tribology: Single Asperity Contact,” ASME J. of Appl. Mech. Rev., 49, pp. 275–298.
Bhushan,  B., 1998, “Contact Mechanics of Rough Surfaces in Tribology: Multiple Asperity Contact,” Tribol. Lett., 4, pp. 1–35.
Greenwood,  J. A., and Williamson,  J. P. B., 1966, “Contact of Nominally Flat Surfaces,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, A295, pp. 300–319.
McCool,  J. I., 1986, “Comparison of Models for the Contact of Rough Surfaces,” Wear, 107, pp. 37–60.
Etsion,  I., and Amit,  M., 1993, “The Effect of Small Normal Loads on the Static Friction Coefficient for Very Smooth Surfaces,” ASME J. Tribol., 115, pp. 406–410.
Polycarpou,  A. A., and Etsion,  I., 1998, “Comparison of the Static Friction Sub-Boundary Lubrication Model with Experimental Measurements on Thin Film Disks,” STLE Tribol. Trans. 41(2), pp. 217–224.
Greenwood,  J. A., and Tripp,  J. H., 1967, “The Elastic Contact of Rough Spheres,” Appl. Mech. Rev., 34, pp. 153–159.
Bush,  A. W., Gibson,  R. D., and Keogh,  G. P., 1979, “Strong Anisotropic Rough Surface,” ASME J. Tribol., 101, pp. 15–20.
Chang,  W. R., Etsion,  I., and Bogy,  D. B., 1987, “An Elastic-Plastic Model for the Contact of Rough Surfaces,” ASME J. Tribol., 109, pp. 257–263.
Kogut,  L., and Etsion,  I., 2003, “A Finite Element Based Elastic-Plastic Model for the Contact of Rough Surfaces,” STLE Tribol. Trans., 46, pp. 383–390.
Greenwood, J. A., 1992, “Problem With Surface Roughness,” in Fundamental of Friction: Macroscopic and Microscopic Processes, Singer, I. L. and Pollock, H. M., ed., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 57–76.
Suh, A. Y., 2002, “Detailed Surface Roughness Techniques to Characterize Surfaces From Nano to Macro Scales,” M.S. thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL.
Whitehouse, D. J., 2003, Handbook of Surface and Nanometrology, Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol, pp. 99.
Yu,  N., and Polycarpou,  A. A., 2002, “Contact of Rough Surfaces with Asymmetric Distribution of Asperity Heights,” ASME J. Tribol., 124, pp. 367–376.
McCool,  J. I., 1992, “Non-Gaussian Effects in Microcontact,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 32(1), pp. 115–123.
Adler,  R. J., and Firman,  D., 1981, “A Non-Gaussian Model for Random Surfaces,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, A303, pp. 433–462.
Kotwal,  C. A., and Bhushan,  B., 1996, “Contact Analysis of Non-Gaussian Surfaces for Minimum Static and Kinetic Friction and Wear,” STLE Tribol. Trans., 39, pp. 890–898.
Greenwood,  J. A., and Tripp,  J. H., 1971, “The Contact of Two Nominally Flat Rough Surfaces,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., 185, pp. 625–633.
O’Callaghan,  M., and Cameron,  M. A., 1976, “Static Contact Under Load between Nominally Flat Surface in which Deformation is Purely Elastic,” Wear, 36, pp. 79–97.
Longuet-Higgins,  M. S., 1957, “The Statistical Analysis of a Random Moving Surfaces,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, A249, pp. 321–387.
Francis,  H. A., 1977, “Application of Spherical Indentation Mechanics to Reversible and Irreversible Contact between Rough Surfaces,” Wear, 45, pp. 221–269.
Bush,  A. W., Gibson,  R. D., and Thomas,  T. R., 1975, “The Elastic Contact of a Rough Surface,” Wear, 35, pp. 87–111.
McCool,  J. I., 1987, “Relating Profile Instrument Measurements to the Functional Performance of Rough Surfaces,” ASME J. Tribol., 109, pp. 264–270.
Bush,  A. W., Gibson,  R. D., and Keogh,  G. P., 1976, “The Limits of Elastic Deformation in the Contact of Rough Surfaces,” Mech. Res. Commun., 3, pp. 169–174.
Nayak,  P. R., 1973, “Random Process Model of Rough Surfaces,” ASME J. Lubr. Technol., 93(3), pp. 398–407.
Sayles,  R. S., and Thomas,  T. R., 1979, “Measurement of the Statistical Microgeometry of Engineering Surfaces,” ASME J. Lubr. Technol., 101, pp. 409–417.
Tallian,  T. F., 1972, “The Theory of Partial Elastohydrodynamic Contacts,” Wear, 21, pp. 49–101.
Bhushan, B., 1990, Tribology and Mechanics of Magnetic Storage Device, Springer, New York, pp. 604–605.
Kral,  E. R., Komvopoulos,  K., and Bogy,  D. B., 1996, “Hardness of Thin-Film Media: Scratch Experiments and Finite Element Simulations,” ASME J. Tribol., 118, pp. 1–11.
Bhushan, B., 1999, Handbook of Micro/Nano Tribology, CRC Press, New York, pp. 769–770, 822.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Contour plots of combined skewness values for contacting individual rough surfaces with different standard deviation ratios: (a) σ21=1; (b) σ21=1.5; (c) σ21=2; (d) σ21=5
Grahic Jump Location
Normalized probability density functions of equivalent roughness case I using different methods
Grahic Jump Location
Dimensionless asperity mean pressure, p* versus dimensionless load, P* for equivalent roughness case I
Grahic Jump Location
Dimensionless asperity mean pressure, p* versus dimensionless load, P* for equivalent roughness case II
Grahic Jump Location
Dimensionless asperity mean pressure, p* versus dimensionless load, P* for equivalent roughness case III
Grahic Jump Location
Skewness values of the equivalent rough surface for different individual surface skewness combinations
Grahic Jump Location
Contacting of two rough surfaces: (a) the contact of two rough surfaces; (b) the contact of an equivalent rough surface and a smooth plane
Grahic Jump Location
Typical skewness and kurtosis values for various manufacturing processes (manufacturing process data points from Ref. 16)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In