A Surface Wear Prediction Methodology for Parallel-Axis Gear Pairs

P. Bajpai; A. Kahraman; N. E. Anderson

doi:10.1115/1.1691433

Journal of Tribology | Volume 126 | Issue 3 | TECHNICAL PAPERS

< Previous Article Next Article >

TECHNICAL PAPERS

A Surface Wear Prediction Methodology for Parallel-Axis Gear Pairs

P. Bajpai, Research Assistant, A. Kahraman, Mem. ASME, Associate Professor and N. E. Anderson, Fellow ASME, Staff Engineer

[+] Author and Article Information

P. Bajpai

The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43607

A. Kahraman

The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210e-mail: kahraman.1@osu.edu

N. E. Anderson

General Motors Powertrain, Wixom, MI 48393

J. Tribol 126(3), 597-605 (Jun 28, 2004) (9 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1691433 History: Received January 14, 2003; Revised July 10, 2003; Online June 28, 2004

Article

References

Figures

Citing Articles

Topics: Wear , Gears , Pressure

Purchase this Content

$25.00

Purchase

Learn about subscription and purchase options

Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Illustration of sliding distance of a point a^p on gear p at different positions r

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Illustration of the change of contact pressure (P_ij^κ)^p of a point ij as a function or r

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Wear depth of gear p having no tooth surface modifications after geometry updates of (a) κ=3 and (b) κ=8;ε^κ=2 μm

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Wear depth of gear g having no tooth surface modifications after geometry updates of (a) κ=3 and (b) κ=8;ε^κ=2 μm

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Initial surfaces of (a) gear p and (b) gear g of a modified pair

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Worn surfaces of (a) gear p and (b) gear g having tooth surface modifications after geometry update of κ=8;ε^κ=2 μm

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Cumulative pressure contours of gear p, (a) (P_ij⁰)^p and (b) (P_ij⁸)^p;ε^κ=2 μm

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Tooth surfaces of gear p (a) initial measured surface having both tooth surface modifications and manufacturing errors, and (b) worn surface after κ=8;ε^κ=2 μm

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Tooth surfaces of gear g (a) initial measured surface having both tooth surface modifications and manufacturing errors, and (b) worn surface after κ=8;ε^κ=2 μm

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Worn surfaces of gear p of test-1 after 27 million input cycles: (a) measurement, and (b) prediction

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Comparison of measured and predicted maximum wear depth values as a function of input cycles; k=9.65(10)⁻¹⁹ m²/N

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Web of Science® Times Cited: 36

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

PDF
Email

You must be logged in as an individual user to share content.

Return to: A Surface Wear Prediction Methodology for Parallel-Axis Gear Pairs

Copyright in the material you requested is held by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (unless otherwise noted). This email ability is provided as a courtesy, and by using it you agree that you are requesting the material solely for personal, non-commercial use, and that it is subject to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers' Terms of Use. The information provided in order to email this topic will not be used to send unsolicited email, nor will it be furnished to third parties. Please refer to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers' Privacy Policy for further information.
Share
Get Citation

Bajpai PP, Kahraman AA, Anderson NE. A Surface Wear Prediction Methodology for Parallel-Axis Gear Pairs. ASME. J. Tribol. 2004;126(3):597-605. doi:10.1115/1.1691433.

Download citation file:

RIS (Zotero)

EndNote

BibTex

Medlars

ProCite

RefWorks

Reference Manager

© Copyright
Get Alerts

Processing your request... Please Wait.

A Surface Wear Prediction Methodology for Parallel-Axis Gear Pairs

References

Figures

Methodology used for the computation of wear

A three-dimensional contact mechanics model of the example gear pair 22

Basic involute gear parameters and the coordinate frame

Illustration of sliding distance of a point a^p on gear p at different positions r

Illustration of the change of contact pressure (P_ij^κ)^p of a point ij as a function or r

Wear depth of gear p having no tooth surface modifications after geometry updates of (a) κ=3 and (b) κ=8;ε^κ=2 μm

Wear depth of gear g having no tooth surface modifications after geometry updates of (a) κ=3 and (b) κ=8;ε^κ=2 μm

Initial surfaces of (a) gear p and (b) gear g of a modified pair

Worn surfaces of (a) gear p and (b) gear g having tooth surface modifications after geometry update of κ=8;ε^κ=2 μm

Cumulative pressure contours of gear p, (a) (P_ij⁰)^p and (b) (P_ij⁸)^p;ε^κ=2 μm

Tooth surfaces of gear p (a) initial measured surface having both tooth surface modifications and manufacturing errors, and (b) worn surface after κ=8;ε^κ=2 μm

Tooth surfaces of gear g (a) initial measured surface having both tooth surface modifications and manufacturing errors, and (b) worn surface after κ=8;ε^κ=2 μm

Worn surfaces of gear p of test-1 after 27 million input cycles: (a) measurement, and (b) prediction

Comparison of measured and predicted maximum wear depth values as a function of input cycles; k=9.65(10)⁻¹⁹ m²/N

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Related Content

Journals

Conference Proceedings

eBooks

A Surface Wear Prediction Methodology for Parallel-Axis Gear Pairs

References

Figures

Methodology used for the computation of wear

A three-dimensional contact mechanics model of the example gear pair 22

Basic involute gear parameters and the coordinate frame

Illustration of sliding distance of a point ap on gear p at different positions r

Illustration of the change of contact pressure (Pijκ)p of a point ij as a function or r

Wear depth of gear p having no tooth surface modifications after geometry updates of (a) κ=3 and (b) κ=8;εκ=2 μm

Wear depth of gear g having no tooth surface modifications after geometry updates of (a) κ=3 and (b) κ=8;εκ=2 μm

Initial surfaces of (a) gear p and (b) gear g of a modified pair

Worn surfaces of (a) gear p and (b) gear g having tooth surface modifications after geometry update of κ=8;εκ=2 μm

Cumulative pressure contours of gear p, (a) (Pij0)p and (b) (Pij8)p;εκ=2 μm

Tooth surfaces of gear p (a) initial measured surface having both tooth surface modifications and manufacturing errors, and (b) worn surface after κ=8;εκ=2 μm

Tooth surfaces of gear g (a) initial measured surface having both tooth surface modifications and manufacturing errors, and (b) worn surface after κ=8;εκ=2 μm

Worn surfaces of gear p of test-1 after 27 million input cycles: (a) measurement, and (b) prediction

Comparison of measured and predicted maximum wear depth values as a function of input cycles; k=9.65(10)−19 m2/N

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Related Content

Journals

Conference Proceedings

eBooks

Illustration of sliding distance of a point a^p on gear p at different positions r

Illustration of the change of contact pressure (P_ij^κ)^p of a point ij as a function or r

Wear depth of gear p having no tooth surface modifications after geometry updates of (a) κ=3 and (b) κ=8;ε^κ=2 μm

Wear depth of gear g having no tooth surface modifications after geometry updates of (a) κ=3 and (b) κ=8;ε^κ=2 μm

Worn surfaces of (a) gear p and (b) gear g having tooth surface modifications after geometry update of κ=8;ε^κ=2 μm

Cumulative pressure contours of gear p, (a) (P_ij⁰)^p and (b) (P_ij⁸)^p;ε^κ=2 μm

Tooth surfaces of gear p (a) initial measured surface having both tooth surface modifications and manufacturing errors, and (b) worn surface after κ=8;ε^κ=2 μm

Tooth surfaces of gear g (a) initial measured surface having both tooth surface modifications and manufacturing errors, and (b) worn surface after κ=8;ε^κ=2 μm

Comparison of measured and predicted maximum wear depth values as a function of input cycles; k=9.65(10)⁻¹⁹ m²/N