Experimental and Numerical Investigation of a Gas Compressor Windback Seal

[+] Author and Article Information
Adnan Al-Ghasem, G. L. Morrison

Turbomachinery Laboratory, Mechanical Engineering Department, 3123 Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-3123

John P. Platt

 BP Exploration & Production Tech. Group, Houston, TX

J. Tribol 129(1), 129-134 (Sep 18, 2006) (6 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2401205 History: Received March 15, 2006; Revised September 18, 2006

The effectiveness of a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) commercial code to accurately predict the leakage rate for a windback seal was evaluated. The windback seal under consideration has a rectangular cavity and is similar in design to a gas tooth on stator annular labyrinth seal. The main difference is the windback seal has only one tooth, which continuously winds around the shaft like a screw thread. These seals are used in gas compressors to isolate the gas face seal from bearing oil. A purge gas is passed through the seal into the bearing housing. The helical design allows the seal to clear itself of any oil contamination. The objective is to determine if CFD simulations can be used along with a few experimental tests to study windback seals of this design. Comparison of measurement and predictions for a simple rectangular cavity windback seal shows predictions and measurements comparing very well with maximum differences of 5% for leakage rate. The variation of leakage with shaft speed and pressure ratio across the seal is accurately predicted by the CFD simulations.

Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Test rig description photograph

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Schematic drawing for the windback seal

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Example of a seal grid

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Comparison of measured and predicted seal leakage rate variation with pressure ratio and shaft speed

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Measured and predicted flow coefficient comparison

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Measured and predicted axial pressure distributions

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Effects of tooth clearance and pitch upon seal leakage

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Fraction of leakage passing through the seal cavity




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In