Rotordynamic Force Coefficients for a New Damper Seal Design

[+] Author and Article Information
Bugra H. Ertas

Rotating Equipment Group, Vibrations & Dynamics Laboratory, GE Global Research Center, Niskayuna, NY 12309ertas@research.ge.com

John M. Vance

Turbomachinery Laboratory, Mechanical Engineering Department, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-3123jvance@tamu.edu

J. Tribol 129(2), 365-374 (Nov 03, 2006) (10 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2464138 History: Received April 17, 2006; Revised November 03, 2006

The objective of the following work was to determine frequency-dependent rotordynamic force coefficients for a new annular gas damper seal design. Both rotating and nonrotating experimental tests are presented for inlet pressures at 1000psig(69bar), a frequency excitation range of 20300Hz, and rotor speeds up to 15,200rpm. Two different testing methods were used for determining coefficients: (1) dynamic pressure response method and (2) mechanical impedance method. The dynamic pressure method required the measurement of internal seal cavity pressure modulations in combination with the vibratory motion, whereas the mechanical impedance method used the measurement of external shaker forces, accelerations, and motion of the mechanical system. In addition to the new fully partitioned damper seal (FPDS) tests, the same experiments were conducted for a conventional pocket damper seal (PDS) design. Results of the frequency-dependent force coefficients and the internal seal dynamics for the two different gas damper seals are compared. The conclusions of the tests show that the FPDS design possesses significantly more positive direct damping and direct stiffness compared to the conventional PDS. The experiments also show the measurement of same-sign cross-coupled (cross-axis) stiffness coefficients for both seals, which indicate that the seals do not produce a destabilizing influence on rotor-bearing systems.

Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Experimental measurements and cross-sectional views

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Experimental measurements: Mechanical impedance method (7)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Annular gas seals in a straight-through compressor

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Gas damper seals: Six bladed conventional PDS versus FPDS

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

High-pressure seal test rig (7)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Cavity orientation and coordinate axis

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Static and dynamic pressure transducer installation: Single row of cavities

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Experimental measurements: Dynamic pressure response method FP PDS

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Stand-alone cavities: Diverging and converging configurations

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Phasor diagram: Stand-alone cavities

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Dynamic pressure phase: 0deg row and X-direction excitation

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

Dynamic force density and pressure phase: Inactive plenums

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 14

Rotordyanmic force coefficients: Dynamic pressure response method, nonrotating

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 15

Rotordynamic force coefficients: Mechanical impedance method, 15,200rpm



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In