0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Influence of Groove Size on the Static and Rotordynamic Characteristics of Short, Laminar-Flow Annular Seals

[+] Author and Article Information
Dara W. Childs

The Leland T. Jordan Professor of Mechanical Engineering, Turbomachinery Laboratory, Texas A&M University, College Station, TXdchilds@tamu.edu

Matthew Graviss

SRS Technologies

Luis E. Rodriguez

 Sulzer Hickham, La Porte, TX

J. Tribol 129(2), 398-406 (Jan 05, 2007) (9 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2647471 History: Received May 03, 2006; Revised January 05, 2007

Test results are presented for a smooth seal and three centrally grooved seals that are representative of buffered-flow oil seals in centrifugal compressors. The seals are short (LD0.21), with a diameter of 117mm and a nominal radial clearance of 0.085mm, netting the clearance-to-radius ratio 0.0015. The grooves have groove depth to clearance ratios (DgCr) of 5, 10, and 15. Test conditions include three shaft speeds from 4000rpm to 10,000rpm, three inlet oil pressures from 24bar to 70bar, and seal eccentricity ratios from 0 (centered) to 0.7. Dynamic results include stiffness, damping, and added-mass coefficients; static results include stator position, attitude angles, and seal leakage. Stiffness, damping, and mass coefficients plus leakage are compared for the seal geometries. Results show that all rotordynamic coefficients consistently decrease with increasing seal groove depths, and seal leakage is largely unchanged. Comparisons are also made between experimental results and predictions from a computer program based on a Reynolds + energy equation model. The model includes the assumption that a groove is large enough to create separate lands within the seal, creating a zero or negligible pressure perturbation within the groove. Test results show that even the deepest groove depth tested is not deep enough to satisfy this assumption.

Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Oil seal assembly (1)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Grooved seal assemblies [2]

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Rectangular groove geometry

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Eccentricity loci for the grooved seal with Dg∕Cr=10 at 7000rpm

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

S−1 versus ε0 for smooth and grooved seals for ω=4000rpm and ΔP=70bars and the four Dg∕Cr ratios

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Measured and predicted leakage for smooth and grooved seals for three supply pressures at 4000rpm

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Measured dynamic coefficients for the grooved seal with Dg∕Cr=5 for ω=10,000rpm, ΔP=70bar, and ε0=0.5

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Kyy versus ε0 for three speeds at ΔP=70bar

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Kxx versus ε0 for three speeds at ΔP=70bar

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Kxy and Kyx versus ε0 for three speeds at ΔP=70bar

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Cyy and Cxx versus ε0 for a running speed of 10,000rpm speeds at ΔP=70bar

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Cyx and Cxy versus ε0 for a rotor speed of 10,000rpm at ΔP=70bars

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

Mxx versus ε0 for ΔP=70bars at ω=10,000rpm

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 14

WFR versus ε0 for three ΔPs at ω=10,000rpm

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 15

kyx and Cxx at reduced eccentricity ratios

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In