0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Analysis of Contact Characteristics of Small Rough Surfaces Taking Bulk Deformation and Meniscus Force Into Consideration

[+] Author and Article Information
Kyosuke Ono

Storage Technology Research Center, Central Research Laboratory, Hitachi Ltd, 2880, Kozu, Odawara-shi, Kanagawa-ken 256-8510, Japankyosuke.ono.jk@hitachi.com

Masami Yamane

Department of Mechanical and Control Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1, Ookayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8552, Japanfwjd8106@mb.infoweb.ne.jp

J. Tribol 129(3), 453-460 (Jan 13, 2007) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2736426 History: Received May 05, 2006; Revised January 13, 2007

We numerically investigated the characteristics of contact force, adhesion force, and contact stiffness between a smooth contact pad and a small rough surface, such as a current magnetic disk surface. The computer-generated asperity had an isotropic Gaussian distribution with a small asperity height and high asperity density. We took asperity contact, bulk deformation, and meniscus force of a lubricant layer at contacting asperity into consideration in the calculations. We evaluated the effects of asperity density, contact pad area, asperity radius, root mean square (RMS) asperity height, and lubricant thickness on external and internal contact forces, adhesion force, and contact stiffness as a function of the separation between the contact pad and disk in both approaching and separating processes. We found that contact and adhesion force tend to change suddenly at the start and end of contact and exhibits hysteresis in the approaching and separating processes when asperity density becomes large and RMS asperity height becomes small comparable with current head sliders and magnetic disks. We also found that contact stiffness is governed by bulk deformation and that the contact stiffness and adhesion force can be regarded as constant during contact when the asperity density increases, the RMS asperity height decreases, and the contact area increases.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Effect of a contact pad area on contact characteristics (σ=0.5nm, ρ=30μm−2, R=2.0μm, hl=1.0nm)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Relationship between ratio of contact stiffness and contact pad area at each asperity density (R=2.0μm, hl=1.0nm)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Effect of RMS asperity height on contact characteristics (S=20×20μm2, ρ=10μm−2, R=2.0μm, hl=1.0nm)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Effect of lubricant thickness on contact characteristics (S=20×20μm2, σ=0.5nm, ρ=10μm−2, R=2.0μm)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Rough surface contact model with asperity and bulk deformation

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Meniscus model in toe-dipping regime

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Effect of asperity density on contact characteristics (σ=0.5nm, S=10μm×10μm, R=2.0μm, hl=1.0nm). (a) External contact force Fc, (b) ratio of adhesion force to its minimum value Fa∕∣Famin∣, (c) internal (real) contact force Fcr, and (d) contact stiffness kcr.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Separations at start and end of contact and minimum external contact force as function of asperity density (σ=0.5nm, S=10μm×10μm, R=2.0μm, hl=1.0nm)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Effect of radius of curvature of asperity summit (S=20×20μm2, σ=0.5nm, ρ=30μm−2, hl=1.0nm)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In