0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Influence of Surface Roughness on Non-Newtonian Thermohydrostatic Performance of a Hole-Entry Hybrid Journal Bearing

[+] Author and Article Information
T. Nagaraju

 P.E.S. College of Engineering, Mandya 571 401, India

Satish C. Sharma, S. C. Jain

Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee 247 667, India

J. Tribol 129(3), 595-602 (Mar 10, 2007) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2736451 History: Received March 10, 2006; Revised March 10, 2007

A general solution scheme to account the surface roughness and the cross-film viscosity variation of lubricant due to its non-Newtonian behavior and rise in fluid-film temperature for the analysis of fluid-film bearings is presented. The combined influence of surface roughness, non-Newtonian behavior of lubricant, and thermal effects on the performance of a hole-entry hybrid journal bearing system has been investigated. The surface roughness, especially stationary roughness (i.e., rough bearing and smooth journal) with a transverse pattern was found to partially compensate for the loss in load-carrying capacity due to the thermal and/or non-Newtonian behavior of lubricant effects. It limits 18.86% loss in load-carrying capacity due to the thermal effect to only 1.6% and 33.99% loss due to the combined influence of non-Newtonian lubricant and thermal effect to 16.76%.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Hole–entry journal bearing system

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Bearing geometry and surface profile

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Load-carrying capacity versus eccentricity ratio

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Circumferential midfilm temperature distribution at axial midplane (β=0.0)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Circumferential fluid-film pressure distribution at the axial midplane (β=0.0)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Load-carrying capacity versus surface roughness parameter (Λ)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Load-carrying capacity versus restrictor design parameter

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Percentage change in load-carrying capacity (%F¯o) of smooth and rough bearings due to (a) thermal effect and (b) thermal and non-Newtonian effect

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In