Performance of Sliders Flying Over Discrete-Track Media

[+] Author and Article Information
Jianhua Li, Junguo Xu, Yuki Shimizu

Central Research Laboratory, Hitachi Ltd., 1, Kirihara, Fujisawa, Kanagawa, 252-8588, Japan

J. Tribol 129(4), 712-719 (Jun 11, 2007) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2768069 History: Received May 07, 2006; Revised June 11, 2007

A simulation method in which grooves are virtually distributed on the slider air bearing instead of on the grooved medium surface has been developed and used to investigate the performance of sliders flying over the surface of a discrete-track medium. The simulated flying height loss due to a discrete-track medium coincides well with the measured data, whereas the average-estimation method overestimates flying height loss. Among the characteristics of a slider flying over the surface of a discrete-track medium that were studied are the flying attitude, the effect of groove parameters on flying profile, and the flying height losses due to manufacturing variation and altitude. The results indicate that when a slider is flying over the surface of a discrete-track medium, it will have a higher 3σ of flying height, be more sensitive to altitude, and will have a greater flying height loss.

Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Local spacing in actual and modeled slider-DTM interfaces: (a) Actual slider-DTM interface and (b) modeled slider-DTM interface

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

Effect of DTM groove depth variation on flying height

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 14

Flying attitude of slider flying a DTM at altitudes of 0m and 3000m

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Head-disk interface of the DTM recording system

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

A two-step micro air bearing and, for two groove depths, its load capacity as a function of groove width: (a) Two-step micro air bearing and (b) load capacity versus groove width

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Load capacity versus groove depth and width for various flow factor models of the micro air bearing shown in Fig. 3 (W100 and W50 indicate groove widths of 100nm and 50nm)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Sliders with two models of distributed grooves, and flying attitude versus radius for them and for a slider without distributed grooves: (a) model A, (b) model B, (c) flying height versus radius, and (d) pitch angle versus radius

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Pressure distributions on ABS for DTM with groove widths of (a)18μm, (b)14.2μm, and (c)11.35μm

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Various groove distributions on slider surface (grooves shown in black) and flying profiles of sliders with them: (a) models, (b) flying height versus radius, and (c) pitch angle versus radius

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Slider’s flying attitudes for three kinds of DTM and a conventional track medium: (a) flying height versus radius and (b) pitch angle versus radius

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Slider’s flying height losses versus land area ratio: (a) simulated and average-estimation results and (b) average-estimation results, simulation at MD results, and measured data

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Slider’s flying height losses versus groove depth by simulation and average estimation

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Slider’s pitch angle losses versus groove depth

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 15

Head-DTM interface and its parameters

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 16

Current gap flying height, conventional flying height and average height versus land area ratio

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Slider’s pitch angle losses versus land area ratio




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In