0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Effects of Surface Roughness on Sliding Friction in Lubricated-Point Contacts: Experimental and Numerical Studies

[+] Author and Article Information
Shun Wang1

State Key Laboratory of Tribology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, Chinawangshun04@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn

Yuan-zhong Hu, Hui Wang

State Key Laboratory of Tribology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Wen-zhong Wang

School of Mechanical and Vehicular Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China

1

Corresponding author.

J. Tribol 129(4), 809-817 (Mar 30, 2007) (9 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2768081 History: Received November 20, 2006; Revised March 30, 2007

The objective of the present work is to investigate experimentally and numerically the influences of surface roughness, produced by typical machining processes, on friction performances in lubricated-point contacts. Prior to the full experimental investigation, a series of tests had been conducted to examine the experimental errors, resulting from repeated tests on the same specimen but at different tracks, with different amounts of lubricant supply, or after the sample reinstallation. Then, the effects of amplitude and texture of surface roughness on friction behavior are investigated in rotational and reciprocal-mode tests, respectively. The measured friction, averaged over the repeated tests and plotted as a function of sliding speed, shows Stribeck-type curves, which manifest the transition from full-film, mixed, to boundary lubrication. Results show that the roughness amplitude imposes a strong influence on the magnificence of friction and the route of lubrication transition. It is also observed that transverse roughness would give rise to a smaller friction coefficient than the longitudinal one under the same operating conditions. Moreover, the deterministic numerical solution of mixed lubrication has been extended to evaluate friction between rough surfaces over a wide range of lubrication regimes. The numerical simulation results are compared and agree very well with experiments.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Outlook of test rig: (a) rotational mode and (b) reciprocal mode

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Samples of disk: (a) side grinding and (b) plane grinding

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Results for error analysis of experiment: (a) relative errors of measured friction data from repeated tests in rotational mode; (b) relative errors of measured friction data from repeated tests in reciprocal mode; (c) relative errors of measured friction data from repeated tests in rotational mode, but with different lubricant supply rate; and (d) relative errors of measured friction data from repeated tests in reciprocal mode, but with each test conducted after disassembling and reassembling the sample

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Variation of friction coefficient with sliding speeds for three specimens with 1.6μm, 0.8μm, and 0.04μm Ra in rotational mode tests (load: 50g)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Plane-ground surface with two marked sliding directions in which the tests are to be conducted

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Effects of roughness texture on friction from the reciprocal-mode tests on the same specimen with 1.6μm Ra (load: 200g) but along two perpendicular directions: (a) decreasing-speed sequence and (b) increasing-speed sequence

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Worn surfaces measured after tests at 200g load: (a) longitudinal sliding and (b) transverse sliding

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Relative deviations of friction between the longitudinal and the transverse slidings, reproduced based on the measured results in Fig. 6 but plotted as a function of speed. The relative increment is defined as ∣flongitudinal−ftransverse∣∕ftransverse.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Comparison between simulation and experiment (load: 50g). The hollow circle stands for simulation results. (a) 0.8μm Ra surface. (b) 0.04μm Ra surface. (c) Variation of predicted contact area ratio for 0.8μm and 0.04μm Ra surfaces with sliding speed.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Comparison of friction coefficient between experiment and numerical simulation, obtained from the sliding in two perpendicular directions and under the same conditions as in Fig. 6. The hollow rectangle stands for experimental results. (a) Longitudinal roughness. (b) Transverse roughness. (c) Variation of predicted contact area ratio for longitudinal and transverse roughnesses with sliding speed.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In