0
Research Papers: Applications

Optimization of Groove Geometry for Thrust Air Bearing to Maximize Bearing Stiffness

[+] Author and Article Information
Hiromu Hashimoto

Dean of Graduate School of Engineeringhiromu@keyaki.cc.u-tokai.ac.jp

Masayuki Ochiai

 Tokai University, 1117 Kitakaname, Hiratsuka-shi, Kanagawa-ken, 259-1292, Japan

J. Tribol 130(3), 031101 (Jun 23, 2008) (11 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2913546 History: Received August 10, 2007; Revised March 25, 2008; Published June 23, 2008

Hydrodynamic gas film bearings are widely used for very-high-speed, lightly loaded rotating machinery. In the design of hydrodynamic gas film bearings, it is of cardinal importance to enhance the stiffness of gas films to minimize vibration due to external excitations. Among various types of hydrodynamic gas film thrust bearings, grooved bearings have an advantage of high stiffness and load-carrying capacity, but the stiffness of the bearings strongly depends on groove geometry. Therefore, when the groove geometry is suitably designed, it is expected to considerably improve the stability characteristics of the bearings. However, conventional bearing geometries are based on a fixed logarithmic spiral curve, and there is no literature on how to effectively change the groove geometry to drastically improve the bearing characteristics. In this paper, the entirely new optimum design methodology, in which the groove geometry can be flexibly changed by using the spline function, is presented to maximize the stiffness of gas films for grooved thrust bearings. The effectiveness of the methodology is experimentally verified.

Copyright © 2008 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Method of changing groove boundary geometry

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Bearing geometry transformation based on the boundary-fitted coordinate system

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Definition of control volume

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Optimum design variables at W=9.8N

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Groove geometry of bearings and pressure distribution under W=9.8N and ns=40,000rpm

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Comparison of optimized and herringbone bearings

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Variation of bearing characteristics with rotational speed

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Dynamic pressure distributions of imaginary part for W=29.4N and ns=40,000rpm

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Film thickness and spring coefficient with groove depth

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Bearing geometries and various bearing characteristics under constant film thickness condition

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Overview of optimized bearing

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Overview of test rig

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

Air film temperature with rotational speed

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 14

Film thickness with rotational speed

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 15

Comparison of measured data with predicted results for W=14.7N

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 16

Spring coefficient with rotational speed

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In