Technical Briefs

Pseudo-Nine-Point Finite Difference Method for Numerical Analysis of Lubrication

[+] Author and Article Information
Shaoxian Bai, Xudong Peng

College of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310032, China

Yonggang Meng, Shizhu Wen

State Key Laboratory of Tribology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

J. Tribol 131(4), 044502 (Sep 22, 2009) (6 pages) doi:10.1115/1.3195039 History: Received July 10, 2008; Revised July 12, 2009; Published September 22, 2009

Contours of surface texture of contact faces are not always parallel to the directions of the axis in solving Reynolds equations with finite difference method, and this often induces significant pressure saw-tooth effect, which results in an unignored analysis error. In this paper, pseudo-nine-point finite difference, as a new finite difference method, is introduced to solve the lubrication numerical problem of pressure saw-tooth. Also, application is carried out in gas lubrication of hard disk systems to verify the validity of the new method. In analysis, pressure distributions and gas floating forces are calculated for two different types of sliders, and the astringency and efficiency of the new method is discussed. Numerical results show that the pseudo-nine-point finite difference method can restrain pressure saw-tooth evidently, and presents better astringency and efficiency than the traditional five-point finite difference method. With the increase in mesh density, pressure distribution and gas floating force trend to steady. Also, numerical values of the floating force agree well with the experimental ones.

Copyright © 2009 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Convergence process of the two sliders with 200×200 grids

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Effects of the mesh density on the floating force calculation

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Numerical pressure profiles of the calculation sliders

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Difference mesh of the calculation sliders

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Types of calculation sliders

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Illustration of the pseudo-nine-point finite difference method

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Fluid unit in the x1y1z coordinate system

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Effects of the mesh density on calculating efficiency



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In