Normalized Ashurst-Hoover Scaling and a Comprehensive Viscosity Correlation for Compressed Liquids

[+] Author and Article Information
Scott Bair1

 George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Center for High-Pressure Rheology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0405scott.bair@me.gatech.edu

Arno Laesecke

 Thermophysical Properties Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80305-3328Arno.Laesecke@Boulder.NIST.Gov


Corresponding author.

This work is in part a work of the US Government. ASME disclaims all interest in the US Government’s contributions.

J. Tribol 134(2), 021801 (Mar 06, 2012) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4005374 History: Received July 13, 2011; Accepted September 12, 2011; Published March 06, 2012; Online March 06, 2012

The recent move toward physics-based elastohydrodynamics promises to yield advances in the understanding of the mechanisms of friction and film generation that were not possible a few years ago. However, the accurate correlation of the low-shear viscosity with temperature and pressure is an essential requirement. The Ashurst-Hoover thermodynamic scaling, which has been useful for thermal elastohydrodynamic simulation, is normalized here in a manner that maps the viscosity of three widely different liquids onto a master Stickel curve. The master curve can be represented by a combination of two exponential power law terms. These may be seen as expressions of different molecular interaction mechanisms similar to the two free-volume models of Batschinski-Hildebrand and Doolittle, respectively. The new correlation promises to yield more reasonable extrapolations to extreme conditions of temperature and pressure than free-volume models, and it removes the singularity that has prevented wide acceptance of free-volume models in numerical simulations.

Copyright © 2012 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

The Stickel plot for viscosity of PC measured to 1.0 GPa (open data points) and the dielectric relaxation times [31] at pressures to 1.3 GPa and temperatures from 171 to 314 K. The new model was fitted to the viscosities; however, it extrapolates well to the dielectric data at greater pressure.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

The Stickel plot of the new model, Eq. 7, for DMTS. Data points are from measured viscosities.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Viscosity master curves for three diverse materials described with the same d(lnμ)/dβV

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

The new correlation, Eq. 7, applied to the viscosities of R134a, DMP and squalane. Temperature increases to the left, pressure to the right.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

The Stickel function versus the logarithm of viscosity scaling parameter for all six experimental materials. Temperature increases to the left, pressure to the right.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

The βV-Stickel analysis for R134a, 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane and DIDP, Diisodecyl Phthalate. Temperature increases to the left, pressure to the right.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

(a) Master curve for R134a, 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane for pressure to 400 MPa and (b) master curve for DIDP, Diisodecyl Phthalate for pressure to 1000 MPa

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

The materials considered in this work in terms of their electrostatic potential color-mapped onto the isoelectron density surfaces at 0.002 electron•au−3 with a color scale ranging from red (negative charge) to blue (positive charge)




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In