0
Research Papers: Contact Mechanics

Wear Simulation of Metal-on-Metal Hip Replacements With Frictional Contact

[+] Author and Article Information
Lorenza Mattei

Researcher
e-mail: l.mattei@ing.unipi.it

Francesca Di Puccio

Assistant Professor
e-mail: dipuccio@ing.unipi.it
Department of Civil and Industrial Engineering
University of Pisa
Pisa 56122, Italy

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Tribology Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TRIBOLOGY. Manuscript received August 13, 2012; final manuscript received December 16, 2012; published online March 18, 2013. Assoc. Editor: James R. Barber.

J. Tribol 135(2), 021402 (Mar 18, 2013) (11 pages) Paper No: TRIB-12-1126; doi: 10.1115/1.4023207 History: Received August 13, 2012; Revised December 16, 2012

Preclinical wear evaluation is extremely important in hip replacements, wear being one of the main causes of failure. Experimental tests are attractive but highly cost demanding; thus predictive models have been proposed in the literature, mainly based on finite element simulations. In such simulations, the effect of friction is usually disregarded, as it is considered not to affect the contact pressure distribution. However, a frictional contact could also result in a shift of the location of the nominal contact area, which can thus modify the wear maps. The aim of this study is to investigate this effect in wear prediction for metal-on-metal implants. Wear assessment was based on a purpose-developed mathematical model, extension of a previous one proposed by the same authors for metal-on-plastic implants. The innovative aspect of the present study consists in the implementation of a modified location of the nominal contact point due to friction, which takes advantage of the analytical formulation of the wear model. Simulations were carried out aimed at comparing total and resurfacing hip replacements under several gait conditions. The results highlighted that the adoption of a frictional contact yields lower linear wear rates and wider worn areas, while for the adopted friction coefficient (f=0.2), the total wear volume remains almost unchanged. The comparison between total and resurfacing replacements showed higher scaled wear volumes (wear volume divided by wear factor) for the latter, in agreement with the literature. The effect of the boundary conditions (in vivo versus in vitro) was also investigated remarking their influence on implant wear and the need to apply more physiological-like conditions in hip simulators. In conclusion although friction is usually neglected in numerical wear predictions, as it does not affect markedly the contact pressure distribution, its effect in the location of the theoretical contact point was observed to influence wear maps. This achievement could be useful for increasing the correlation between numerical and experimental simulations, usually based on the total wear volume. In order to improve the model reliability, future studies will be devoted to implement the geometry update by combining the present model to finite element analyses. On the other hand, further experimental investigations are required to get out from the wide dispersion of wear factors reported in the literature.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Marker, D. R., Strimbu, K., McGrath, M. S., Zywiel, M. G., and Mont, M. A., 2009, “Resurfacing Versus Conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty—Review of Comparative Clinical and Basic Science Studies,” Bull. NYU Hospital Joint Disease, 67(2), pp. 120–127.
Joyce, T. J., Langton, D. J., Jameson, S. S., and Nargol, A. V. F., 2009, “Tribological Analysis of Failed Resurfacing Hip Prostheses and Comparison With Clinical Data,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part J, 223(3), pp. 317–323. [CrossRef]
Ollivere, B., Darrah, C., Barker, T., Nolan, J., and Porteous, M. J., 2009, “Early Clinical Failure of the Birmingham Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Is Associated With Metallosis and Soft-Tissue Necrosis,” J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. Vol., 91-B (8), pp. 1025–1030. [CrossRef]
Pandit, H., Glyn-Jones, S., McLardy-Smith, P., Gundle, R., Whitwell, D., Gibbons, C. L. M., Ostlere, S., Athanasou, N., Gill, H. S., and Murray, D. W., 2008, “Pseudotumours Associated With Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacings,” J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. Vol., 90-B(7), pp. 847–851. [CrossRef]
Langton, D. J., Jameson, S. S., Joyce, T. J., Webb, J., and Nargol, A. V. F., 2008, “The Effect of Component Size and Orientation on the Concentrations of Metal Ions After Resurfacing Arthroplasty of the Hip,” J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. Vol., 90-B (9), pp. 1143–1151. [CrossRef]
Barnes, C. L., DeBoer, D., Corpe, R. S., Nambu, S., Carroll, M., and Timmerman, I., 2008, “Wear Performance of Large-Diameter Differential-Hardness Hip Bearings,” J. Arthroplasty, 23(6, Suppl.), pp. 56–60. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Witzleb, W.-C., Hanisch, U., Ziegler, J., and Guenther, K.-P., 2009, “In Vivo Wear Rate of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: A Review of 10 Retrieved Components,” J. Arthroplasty, 24(6), pp. 951–956. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cosmi, P., Hoglievina, M., Fancellu, G., and Martinelli, B., 2006, “A Finite Element Method Comparison of Wear in Two Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Prostheses,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part H, 220(8), pp. 871–879. [CrossRef]
Liu, F., Leslie, I., Williams, S., Fisher, J., and Jin, Z., 2008, “Development of Computational Wear Simulation of Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Replacements,” J. Biomech., 41(3), pp. 686–694. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Harun, M. N., Wang, F. C., Jin, Z. M., and Fisher, J., 2009, “Long-Term Contact-Coupled Wear Prediction for Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Joint Replacement,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part J, 223(7), pp. 993–1001. [CrossRef]
Liu, F., Jin, Z. M., Grigoris, P., Hirt, F., and Rieker, C., 2003, “Contact Mechanics of Metal-on-Metal Hip Implants Employing a Metallic Cup With a Uhmwpe Backing,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part H, 217(3), pp. 207–213. [CrossRef]
Udofia, I. J., Yew, A., and Jin, Z. M., 2004, “Contact Mechanics Analysis of Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Prostheses,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part H, 218(5), pp. 293–305. [CrossRef]
Teoh, S. H., Chan, W. H., and Thampuran, R., 2002, “An Elasto-Plastic Finite Element Model for Polyethylene Wear in Total Hip Arthroplasty,” J. Biomech., 35(3), pp. 323–330. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jourdan, F., and Samida, A., 2009, “An Implicit Numerical Method for Wear Modeling Applied to a Hip Joint Prosthesis Problem,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 198(27–29), pp. 2209–2217. [CrossRef]
Mattei, L., Di Puccio, F., and Ciulli, E., 2012, “A Comparative Study on Wear Laws for Soft-on-Hard Hip Implants Using a Mathematical Wear Model,” Tribol. Int. (in press). [CrossRef]
Mattei, L., Di Puccio, F., and Ciulli, E., 2012, “Wear Simulation of Metal on Metal Hip Replacements: An Analytical Approach,” 11th Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis, ESDA, I. ASME, CD-ROM, pp. 1–10.
Buford, A., and Goswami, T., 2004, “Review of Wear Mechanisms in Hip Implants: Paper I—General,” Mater. Design, 25(5), pp. 385–393. [CrossRef]
Maxian, T., Brown, T., Pedersen, D., and Callaghan, J., 1996, “3-Dimensional Sliding-Contact Computational Simulation of Total Hip Wear,” Clin. Orthopaed. Relat. Res., 333, pp. 41–50. [CrossRef]
Dowson, D., Hardaker, C., Flett, M., and Isaac, G. H., 2004, “A Hip Joint Simulator Study of the Performance of Metal-on-Metal Joints: Part I: The Role of Materials,” J. Arthroplasty, 19(8, Suppl.), pp. 118–123. [PubMed]
Dowson, D., Hardaker, C., Flett, M., and Isaac, G. H., 2004, “A Hip Joint Simulator Study of the Performance of Metal-on-Metal Joints: Part II: Design,” J. Arthroplasty, 19(8, Suppl.), pp. 124–130. [PubMed]
Chan, F. W., Bobyn, J. D., Medley, J. B., Krygier, J. J., and Tanzer, M., 1999, “The Otto Aufranc Award. Wear And Lubrication of Metal-on-Metal Hip Implants,” Clin. Orthopaed. Relat. Res., 369, pp. 10–24. [CrossRef]
Dowson, D., 2001, “New Joints for the Millennium: Wear Control in Total Replacement Hip Joints,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part H, 215(4), pp. 335–358. [CrossRef]
Chan, F. W., Bobyn, J. D., Medley, J. B., Krygier, J. J., Yue, S., and Tanzer, M., 1996, “Engineering Issues and Wear Performance of Metal on Metal Hip Implants,” Clin. Orthopaed. Relat. Res., 333, pp. 96–107. [CrossRef]
Brockett, C. L., 2007, “A Comparison of Friction in 28 mm Conventional and 55 mm Resurfacing Metal-on-Metal Hip Replacements,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part J, 221(3), pp. 391–398.
Bishop, N. E., Waldow, F., and Morlock, M. M., 2008, “Friction Moments of Large Metal-on-Metal Hip Joint Bearings and Other Modern Designs,” Med. Eng. Phys., 30(8), pp. 1057–1064. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Flanagan, S., 2010, “In Vitro Friction and Lubrication of Large Bearing Hip Prostheses,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part H, 224(7), pp. 853–864. [CrossRef]
Williams, S., Jalali-Vahid, D., Brockett, C., Jin, Z., Stone, M. H., Ingham, E., and Fisher, J., 2006, “Effect of Swing Phase Load on Metal-on-Metal Hip Lubrication, Friction and Wear,” J. Biomech., 39(12), pp. 2274–2281. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Scholes, S. C., and Unsworth, A., 2000, “Comparison of Friction and Lubrication of Different Hip Prostheses,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part H, 214(1), pp. 49–57. [CrossRef]
Damm, P., Ackermann, R., Bender, A., Graichen, F., and Bergmann, G., 2012, “In Vivo Measurements of the Friction Moment in Total Hip Joint Prosthesis During Walking,” J. Biomech., 45, Suppl. 1, p. S268. [CrossRef]
Leslie, I., Williams, C., Brown, C., Thompson, J., Isaac, G. H., Ingham, E., and Fisher, J., 2007, “Effect of Bearing Size on Wear, Wear Debris and Ion Levels of Surfaces Replacements,” Trans. Orthorpaed. Res. Soc., 32, p. 1707.
Bergmann, G., Deuretzbacher, G., Heller, M., Graichen, F., Rohlmann, A., Strauss, J., and Duda, G. N., 2001, “Hip Contact Forces and Gait Patterns From Routine Activities,” J. Biomech., 34(7), pp. 859–871. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Shin, Y. J., and Kim, C. H., 1991, “An Analytical Solution for Spherical Joint Mechanism Including Coulomb Friction,” International Pacific Conference on Automotive Engineering, Seoul, Korea, pp. 383–389.
Faraz, A., and Payandeh, S., 2001, “Towards Approximate Models of Coulomb Frictional Moments in: (I) Revolute Pin Joints and (II) Spherical-Socket Ball Joints,” J. Eng. Math., 40(3), pp. 283–296. [CrossRef]
Raimondi, M. T., Santambrogio, C., Pietrabissa, R., Raffelini, F., and Molfetta, L., 2001, “Improved Mathematical Model of the Wear of the Cup Articular Surface in Hip Joint Prostheses and Comparison With Retrieved Components,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part H, 215(4), pp. 377–391. [CrossRef]
Calonius, O., and Saikko, V., 2002, “Slide Track Analysis of Eight Contemporary Hip Simulator Designs,” J. Biomech., 35(11), pp. 1439–1450. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Firkins, P., Tipper, J. L., Saadatzadeh, M. R., Ingham, E., Stone, M. H., Farrar, R., and Fisher, J., 2001, “Quantitative Analysis of Wear and Wear Debris From Metal-on-Metal Hip Prostheses Tested in a Physiological Hip Joint Simulator,” Bio-Med. Mater. Eng., 11(2), 143–157.
Essner, A., Sutton, K., and Wang, A., 2005, “Hip Simulator Wear Comparison of Metal-on-Metal, Ceramic-on-Ceramic and Crosslinked Uhmwpe Bearings,” Wear, 259(7–12), pp. 992–995. [CrossRef]
Scholes, S. C., Green, S. M., and Unsworth, A., 2001, “The Wear of Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Prostheses Measured in a Hip Simulator,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part H, 215, pp. 523–530. [CrossRef]
Anissian, H. L., Stark, A., Good, V., Dahlstrand, H., and Clarke, I. C., 2001, “The Wear Pattern in Metal-on-Metal Hip Prostheses,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 58(6), pp. 673–678. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sieber, H. P., Rieker, C. B., and Kottig, P., 1999, “Analysis of 118 Second-Generation Metal-on-Metal Retrieved Hip Implants,” J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. Vol., 81-B (1), pp. 46–50. [CrossRef]
Reinisch, G., Judmann, K. P., Lhotka, C., Lintner, F., and Zweymüller, K. A., 2003, “Retrieval Study of Uncemented Metalâmetal Hip Prostheses Revised for Early Loosening,” Biomaterials, 24(6), pp. 1081–1091. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Heisel, C., Streich, N., Krachler, M., Jakubowitz, E., and Kretzer, J. P., 2008, “Characterization of the Running-in Period in Total Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: An In Vivo and In Vitro Metal Ion Analysis,” J. Bone Joint Surg., 90(3), pp. 125–133. [CrossRef]
Vassiliou, K., Elfick, A. P. D., Scholes, S. C., and Unsworth, A., 2006, “The Effect of ‘Running-in’ on the Tribology and Surface Morphology of Metal-on-Metal Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Device in Simulator Studies,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part H, 220(2), pp. 269–277. [CrossRef]
Morlock, M., Bishop, N., Zustin, J., Hahn, M., Ruther, W., and Amling, M., 2008, “Modes of Implant Failure After Hip Resurfacing: Morphological and Wear Analysis of 267 Retrieval Specimens,” J. Bone Joint Surg., 90(3), pp. 89–95. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

(a) Model geometry. (b) Coordinate reference frames used in model implementation: fixed global frame Cg = {Og,x,y,z} and cartesian frame moving with the cup Cc = {Oc,xc,yc,zc} in the reference configuration, i.e., with null motion angles. The anteversion α and inclination β angles are constant and orient the cup with respect to the pelvis. The cartesian frame moving with the head Ch is not indicated since in this configuration it corresponds to Cc. (c) Spherical coordinates for the cup.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Simulated loading (left) and kinematic (right) conditions for the head. Top: hip simulator curves [30]. Bottom: in vivo curves [31].

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

(a) Frictionless contact: nominal contact point K aligned to the load direction l. (b) Frictional contact: nominal contact point K shifted in the opposite direction to the sliding velocity (c), calculated according to Eq. (26). (d) In red the contact area on the head surface, delimited by the angle ψmax (d). Note: in (a,b) the external load applied to the cup is represented in green, while the contact forces acting on the head in red. In the frictional contact case, an additional moment Mf must be applied to the head to overcome frictional resistance.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

THR results for in vitro boundary conditions (A-BCs) assuming frictionless (top) and frictional contact (bottom): (a) K trajectories on the cup and the head; (b) linear wear depth on the cup; and (c) linear wear depth on the head

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

THR results for in vitro boundary conditions (B-BCs) assuming frictionless (top) and frictional contact (bottom): (a) K trajectories on the cup and the head; (b) linear wear depth on the cup; and (c) linear wear depth on the head

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

THR results for in vivo boundary conditions (C-BCs) assuming frictionless (top) and frictional contact (bottom): (a) K trajectories on the cup and the head; (b) linear wear depth on the cup; and (c) linear wear depth on the head

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

RHR results for in vitro boundary conditions (A-BCs) assuming frictionless (top) and frictional contact (bottom): (a) K trajectories on the cup and the head; (b) linear wear depth on the cup; and (c) linear wear depth on the head

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

RHR results for in vitro boundary conditions (B-BCs) assuming frictionless (top) and frictional contact (bottom): (a) K trajectories on the cup and the head; (b) linear wear depth on the cup; and (c) linear wear depth on the head

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

RHR results for in vivo boundary conditions (C-BCs) assuming frictionless (top) and frictional contact (bottom): (a) K trajectories on the cup and the head; (b) linear wear depth on the cup; and (c) linear wear depth on the head

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In