0
Research Papers: Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication

Dynamic Behaviors of the Elastohydrodynamic Lubricated Contact for Rolling Bearings

[+] Author and Article Information
Yu-Yan Zhang

e-mail: zhangyuyan@bit.edu.cn

Xiao-Li Wang

e-mail: xiaoli_wang@bit.edu.cn

Xiao-Liang Yan

e-mail: yanxiaoliang111@126.com
School of Mechanical Engineering,
Beijing Institute of Technology,
Beijing 100081, PRC

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Tribology Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TRIBOLOGY. Manuscript received May 6, 2012; final manuscript received November 2, 2012; published online December 26, 2012. Assoc. Editor: Dong Zhu.

J. Tribol 135(2), 021501 (Dec 26, 2012) (8 pages) Paper No: TRIB-12-1072; doi: 10.1115/1.4023084 History: Received May 06, 2012; Revised November 02, 2012

The dynamic behaviors of a single elastohydrodynamic lubricated (EHL) contact between a rolling element and raceways under wider load and speed ranges are analyzed numerically based on the transient EHL model and the free vibration model. The discrete convolution and fast fourier transform method is implemented in order to increase the computational efficiency associated with elastic deformations and the semisystem approach is applied to improve the solution convergence under severe conditions. The change of mutual approach is selected as the standard of bearing vibrations and the inlet length and dimensionless natural frequency corresponding to the working load and speed are determined. The numerical results demonstrate that the stiffness increases with the increasing load and decreases with speed. However, the changes of damping are different in various working conditions, especially under heavier load and higher speed. It is also indicated that the stiffness and damping increase with the increase in ambient viscosity and the decrease in pressure-viscosity coefficient.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Hagiu, G. D., and Gafitanu, M. D., 1997, “Dynamic Characteristics of High Speed Angular Contact Ball Bearings,” Wear, 211, pp. 22–29. [CrossRef]
Sarangi, M., Majumdar, B. C., and Sekhar, A. S., 2004, “Stiffness and Damping Characteristics of Lubricated Ball Bearings Considering the Surface Roughness Effect. Part 1: Theoretical Formulation,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part J: J. Eng. Tribol., 218, pp. 529–538. [CrossRef]
Wijnant, Y. H., 1998, “Contact Dynamics in the Field of Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Twente, The Netherlands.
Nonato, F., and Cavalca, K. L., 2010, “On the Non-Linear Dynamic Behavior of Elastohydrodynamic Lubricated Point Contact,” J. Sound Vib., 329, pp. 4656−4671. [CrossRef]
Wensing, J. A., 1998, “On the Dynamics of Ball Bearings,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Twente, The Netherlands.
Dietl, P., Wensing, J., and Nijen, G. C., 2000, “Rolling Bearing Damping for Dynamic Analysis of Multi-Body Systems-Experimental and Theoretical Results,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part K: J. Multi-body Dyn., 214, pp. 33−43. [CrossRef]
Hamrock, B. J., and Dowson, D., 1977, “Isothermal Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication of Point Contacts, Part 4-Starvation Results,” ASME J. Lubr. Technol., 99, pp. 15–23. [CrossRef]
Ehret, P., Dowson, D., Taylor, C. M., and Wang, D., 1997, “Analysis of Isothermal Elastohydrodynamic Point Contacts Lubricated by Newtonian Fluids Using Multigrid Methods,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci., 211, pp. 493–508. [CrossRef]
Hamrock, B. J., and Dowson, D., 1977, “Isothermal Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication of Point Contacts, Part 3-Fully Flooded Results,” ASME J. Lubr. Technol., 99, pp. 264–276. [CrossRef]
Sarangi, M., Majumdar, B. C., and Sekhar, A. S., 2004, “Stiffness and Damping Characteristics of Lubricated Ball Bearings Considering the Surface Roughness Effect. Part 2: Numerical Results and Application,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part J: J. Eng. Tribol., 218, pp. 539–547. [CrossRef]
Forster, N. H., Svendsen, V. R., Givan, G. D., Thompson, K. L., Dao, N. H., and Nicholson, B. D., 2011, “Parametric Testing and Heat Generation Modeling of 133-mm Bore Ball Bearings: Part I—Results With Metal Rolling Elements,” Tribol. Trans., 54, pp. 315–324. [CrossRef]
Harris, T. A., and Kotzalas, M. N., 2007, Rolling Bearing Analysis: Advanced Concepts of Bearing Technology, 5th ed., CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL.
RoelandsC. J. A., 1966, “Correlational Aspects of the Viscosity-Temperature-Pressure Relationship of Lubricating Oils,” Ph.D. thesis, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands.
Dowson, D., and Higginson, G. R., 1966, Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication, Pergamon, New York.
Liu, Y. C., Wang, Q. J., Wang, W. Z., Hu, Y. Z., and Zhu, D., 2006, “Effects of Differential Scheme and Mesh Density on EHL Film Thickness in Point Contacts,” ASME J. Tribol., 128, pp. 641–653. [CrossRef]
Liu, S., Wang, Q. J. and Liu, G., 2000, “A Versatile Method of Discrete Convolution and FFT (DC-FFT) for Contact Analyses,” Wear, 243, pp. 101–111. [CrossRef]
Wijnant, Y. H., and Venner, C. H., 1997, “Analysis of an EHL Circular Contact Incorporating Rolling Element Vibration,” Proceedings of the 23st Leeds-Lyon Symposium on Tribology, pp. 445–456.
Ali, N. J., and García, J. M., 2010, “Experimental Studies on the Dynamic Characteristics of Rolling Element Bearings,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part J: J. Eng. Tribol., 224, pp. 659–666. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Contact vibration model of a rolling element and the raceway

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Equivalent EHL contact model and spring-damper model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Free vibrations of a one-degree-of-freedom system decay exponentially

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Flow chart for the analysis of transient EHL under free vibrations

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Comparison of the variations of steady state mutual approach with load under different speeds

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

The changes of stiffness and damping with increasing dimensionless inlet length (w = 20 N and u = 2 m/s)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

The changes of stiffness and damping with dimensionless natural frequency (w = 50 N and u = 2 m/s)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Mutual approach displacement Δh0 versus time at different loads for u = 2 m/s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Stiffness and damping coefficients as functions of load (u = 2 m/s)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Stiffness and damping coefficients as functions of load (u = 8 m/s)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Damping coefficients as functions of load for different speeds

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Stiffness and damping coefficients as functions of speed (w = 50 N)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Stiffness and damping coefficients as functions of speed (w = 500 N)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Damping coefficients as functions of speed for different loads

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Stiffness and damping coefficients as functions of ambient viscosity (w = 100 N and u = 2 m/s)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Stiffness and damping coefficients as functions of α (w = 100 N and u = 2 m/s)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In