Research Papers: Friction & Wear

The Effect of Nanoparticles on the Real Area of Contact, Friction, and Wear

[+] Author and Article Information
Hamed Ghaednia

e-mail: ghaednia@auburn.edu

Robert L. Jackson

e-mail: jacksr7@auburn.edu
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Auburn University, 1418 Wiggins Hall,
Auburn, AL 36849

Contributed by the Tribology Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Tribology. Manuscript received October 24, 2012; final manuscript received April 16, 2013; published online August 6, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Hong Liang.

J. Tribol 135(4), 041603 (Aug 06, 2013) (10 pages) Paper No: TRIB-12-1187; doi: 10.1115/1.4024297 History: Received October 24, 2012; Revised April 16, 2013

Although nanoparticle additives have been the topic of multiple studies recently, very little work has attempted to explicitly model the third body contact of nanoparticles. This work presents and uses a novel methodology to model nanoparticles in contact between rough surfaces. The model uses two submodels to handle different scales of contact, namely the nano-sized particles and micrometer-sized roughness features. Silicon nanoparticles suspended in conventional lubricant are modeled in contact between steel rough surfaces. The effect of the particles on contact force and real area of contact has been modeled. The model makes predictions of the coefficient of friction and wear using fundamental models. The results suggest that particles would reduce the real area of contact and, therefore, decrease the friction force. Also, particles could induce abrasive wear by scratching the surfaces. The implications of the model are also discussed, and the arguments and results have been linked to available experimental data. This work finds that particle size and distribution are playing a key role in tribology characteristics of the nanolubricants.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Illustration of stacked rough surface and statistical model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Schematic of the overall contact problem

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematic of the spherical particle contact mechanics

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Schematic of the particle abrasive wear

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

The effect of particle concentration (a) and particle average size (b) on the real contact area versus contact force

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

The effect of particle distribution on the real area of contact

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Surface profile (a) and fast Fourier transform analysis (b) of one of the surfaces used in this paper

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Fractured particles as a function of surface separation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

The effect of surface roughness on (a) the real area of contact versus contact force and (b) change in the real area of contact as the result of nanoparticles

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Coefficient of friction and particle induced wear versus nanoparticle content

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Particle induced wear (a) and coefficient of friction (b) changing with particle average size and distribution




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In