Research Papers: Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication

Multiscale Analysis of the Roughness Effect on Lubricated Rough Contact

[+] Author and Article Information
Ibrahim Demirci

e-mail: ibrahim.demirci@ensam.eu

Sabeur Mezghani

e-mail: sabeur.mezghani@ensam.eu
Arts et Métiers Paristech,
Rue Saint Dominique, BP 508,
Châlons en Champagne 51006, France

Mohammed Yousfi

Direction de l'Ingénierie Mécanique,
Renault S.A.S,
67 Rue Des Bons Raisins,
Rueil Malmaison 92500, France
e-mail: mohammed.yousfi@renault.com

Mohamed El Mansori

Arts et Métiers Paristech,
Rue Saint Dominique, BP 508,
Châlons en Champagne 51006, France
e-mail: Mohamed.elmansori@ensam.eu

Contributed by the Tribology Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TRIBOLOGY. Manuscript received October 24, 2012; final manuscript received July 21, 2013; published online September 23, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Robert L. Jackson.

J. Tribol 136(1), 011501 (Sep 23, 2013) (8 pages) Paper No: TRIB-12-1185; doi: 10.1115/1.4025222 History: Received October 24, 2012; Revised July 21, 2013

Determining friction is as equally essential as determining the film thickness in the lubricated contact, and is an important research subject. Indeed, reduction of friction in the automotive industry is important for both the minimization of fuel consumption as well as the decrease in the emissions of greenhouse gases. However, the progress in friction reduction has been limited by the difficulty in understanding the mechanism of roughness effects on friction. It was observed that micro-surface geometry or roughness was one of the major factors that affected the friction coefficient. In the present study, a new methodology coupling the multiscale decomposition of the surface and the prediction of the friction coefficient by numerical simulation was developed to understand the influence of the scale of roughness in the friction coefficient. In particular, the real surface decomposed in different roughness scale by multiscale decomposition, based on ridgelets transform, was used as input into the model. This model predicts the effect of scale on mixed elastohydroynamic point contact. The results indicate a good influence of the fine scale of surface roughness on the friction coefficient for full-film lubrication as well as a beginning of improvement for mixed lubrication.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Dowson, D., and Higginson, G. R., 1966, Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication, The Fundamentals of Roller and Gear Lubrication, Pergamon, Oxford, UK.
Hamrock, B., and Dowson, D., 1977, “Isothermal Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication of Point Contacts, Part III—Fully Floded Results,” ASME J. Lubr. Technol., 99, pp. 264–276. [CrossRef]
Spikes, H. A., 1999, “Thin Films in Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication: The Contribution of Experiment,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part J: J. Eng. Tribol., 213, pp. 335–352. [CrossRef]
Kaneta, M., and KishikawaH., 1999, “Experimental Study on Microelastohydrodynamic Lubrication,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part J: J. Eng. Tribol., 213, pp. 371–382. [CrossRef]
Lubrecht, A. A., and Venner, C. H., 1999, “Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication of Rough Surfaces,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part J: J. Eng. Tribol., 213, pp. 397–404. [CrossRef]
Jacobson, B., and Hamrock, B. J., 1984, “Non-Newtonian Fluid Model Incorporated into Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication of Rectangular Contacts,” ASME J. Tribol., 106(2), pp. 275–284. [CrossRef]
Sui, P. C., and Sadeghi, F., 1991, “Non-Newtonian Thermal Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication,” ASME J. Tribol., 113(2), pp. 390–3973. [CrossRef]
Conry, T. F., Wang, S., and Cusano, C., 1987, “A Reynolds–Eyring Equation for Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication in Line Contacts,” ASME J. Tribol., 109(4), pp. 648–658. [CrossRef]
Kim, K. H., and Sadeghi, F., 1991, “Non-Newtonian Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication of Point Contacts,” ASME J. Tribol., 113(4), pp. 703–711. [CrossRef]
Evans, C. R., and Johnson, K. L., 1986, “Regimes of Traction in Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci., 200, pp. 313–324. [CrossRef]
Olver, A., and Spikes, H. A., 1998, “Prediction of Traction in Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part J: J. Eng. Tribol., 212, pp. 321–332. [CrossRef]
Jacod, B., Venner, C. H., and Lugt, P. M., 2001, “A Generalized Traction Curve for EHL Contacts,” ASME J. Tribol.123(2), pp. 248–253. [CrossRef]
Jacod, B., Venner, C. H., and Lugt, P. M., 2004, “Influence of Longitudinal Roughness on Friction in EHL Contacts,” ASME J. Tribol.126(3), pp. 473–481. [CrossRef]
Patir, N., and Cheng, H. S., 1978, “An Average Flow Model for Determining Effects of Three-Dimensional Roughness on Partial Hydrodynamic Lubrication,” ASME J. Lubr. Technol., 100, pp. 12–17. [CrossRef]
Tripp, J. H., 1983, “Surface Roughness Effetcs in Hydrodynamic Lubrication: The Flow Factor Method,” ASME J. Lubr. Technol., 105, pp. 458–465. [CrossRef]
Kim, T. W., and Cho, Y. J., 2007, “The Flow Factors Considering the Elastic Deformation for the Rough Surface With a Non-Gaussian Height Distribution,” Tribol. Trans., 51, pp. 213–220. [CrossRef]
Goglia, P. R., Cusano, C., and Conry, T. F., 1984, “The Effects of Irregularities on the Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication in Sliding Line Contacts: Part I—Single Irregularities,” ASME J. Tribol., 106(1), pp. 104–112. [CrossRef]
Greenwood, J. A., and Johnson, K. L., 1992, “The Behaviour of Transverse Roughness in Sliding Elastohydrodynamic Lubricated Contacts,” Wear, 153, pp. 107–117. [CrossRef]
Morales-Espejel, G. E., 1993, “Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication of Smooth and Rough Surface,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Venner, C. H., 1991, “Muiltilevel Solution of EHL Line and Point Contact Problems,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Twente, Enscheden, The Netherlands.
Hooke, C. J., 1998, “Surface Roughness Modification in Elasto-Hydrodynamic Operating in thee Elastic Piezoviscous Regime,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part J: J. Eng. Tribol., 212, pp. 145–162. [CrossRef]
Hooke, C. J., 1999, “Surface Roughness Modification in EHL Line Contacts—The Effects of Roughness Wavelength, Orientation and Operating Conditions,” Proceedings of the Leeds–Lyon Symposium on Tribology, pp. 193–202.
Venner, H. C., and Lubrecht, A. A., 1999, “Amplitude Reduction of Non-Isotropic Harmonic Patterns in Circular EHL Contacts Under Pure Rolling,” Proceedings of the Leeds–Lyon Symposium on Tribology, pp. 151–162.
Chapkov, A., 2006, “Etude des Contacts Elastohydrodynamique Lubrifiés Avec un Fluide Non-Newtonien,” Ph.D. thesis, INSA de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Riche, I., and Villechaise, B., 2004, “Etude de la Lubrication EHD Rugueuse Etablie Localement dans un Palier,” Mech. Ind., 5, pp. 677–684.
Elrod, H. G., 1973, “Thin-Film Lubrication Theory for Newtonian Fluids With Surfaces Processing Started Roughness or Grooving,” ASME J. Lubr. Technol., 95, pp. 484–489. [CrossRef]
Bayada, G., and Chambat, M., 1988, “New Models in the Theory of the Hydrodynamic Lubrication of Rough Surfaces,” ASME J. Tribol., 110(3), pp. 402–407. [CrossRef]
Bayada, G., Martin, S., and Vazquez, C., 2005, “An Average Flow-Model of the Reynolds Roughness Including a Mass-Flow Preserving Cavitation Model,” ASME J. Tribol., 127(4), pp. 793–802. [CrossRef]
Buscaglia, G., and Jaï, M., 2000, “A New Numerical Scheme for Non Uniform Homogenized Problems: Application to the Non Linear Reynolds Compressible Equation,” Math. Probl. Eng., 7, pp. 355–378. [CrossRef]
Kane, M., and Bou-Said, B., 2004, “Comparison of Homogenization and Direct Techniques for the Traeatment of Roughness in Incompressible Lubrication,” ASME J. Tribol., 126(4), pp. 733–737. [CrossRef]
Etsion, I., 2005, “State of the Art in Laser Surface Texturing,” ASME J. Tribol., 127(1), pp. 248–253. [CrossRef]
Siripuram, R. B., and Stephens, L. S., 2004, “Effect of Deterministic Asperity Geometry on Hydrodynamic Lubrication,” ASME J. Tribol., 126(3), pp. 527–534. [CrossRef]
Nanbu, T., Ren, N., Yasuda, Y., Zhu, D., and Wang, Q. J., 2007, “Micro Textures in Concentrated Conformal-Contact Lubrication: Effects of Texture Bottom Shape and Surface Relative Motion,” Tribol. Lett., 29, pp. 241–252. [CrossRef]
Kovalchenko, A., Ajayi, O., Erdemir, A., Fenske, G., and Etsion, I., 2005, “The Effect of Laser Surface Texturing on Transitions in Lubrication Regimes During Unidirectional Sliding Contact,” Tribol. Int., 38, pp. 219–225. [CrossRef]
Ajayi, O. O., Erck, R. A., Lorenzo-Martin, C., and Fenske, G. R., 2009, “Frictional Anisotropy Under Boundary Lubrication: Effect of Surface Texture,” Wear, 267, pp. 1214–1219. [CrossRef]
Martini, A., Zhu, D., and Wang, Q., 2007, “Friction Reduction in Mixed Lubrication,” Tribol. Lett., 28, pp. 139–147. [CrossRef]
Wang, W., Wang, S., Shi, F., Wang, Y., Chen, H., Wang, H., and Hu, Y., 2007, “Simulations and Measurement of Sliding Friction Between Rough Surfaces in Point Contacts: From EHL to Boundary Lubrication,” ASME J. Tribol., 129(3), pp. 495–501. [CrossRef]
Demirci, I., Mezghani, S., Yousfi, M., Zahouani, H., and El Mansori, M., 2012, “The Scale Effect of Roughness on Hydrodynamic Contact Friction,” Tribol. Trans., 55(5), pp. 705–712. [CrossRef]
Mezghani, S., Demirci, I., Zahouani, H., and El Mansori, M., 2012, “The Effect of Groove Texture Patterns on Piston-Ring Pack Friction,” Precis. Eng., 36(2), pp. 210–217. [CrossRef]
Najji, B., Bou-Said, B., and Berthe, D., 1989, “New Formulation for Lubrication With Non-Newtonian Fluids,” ASME J. Tribol., 111(1), pp. 29–33. [CrossRef]
Roelands, C. J. A., 1966, “Correlational Aspects of the Viscosity–Temperature–Pressure Relationships of Lubricant Oil,” Ph.D. thesis, Technische Hogeschol Delft, Delft, The Netherlands.
Venner, C. H., and Morales-Espejel, G. E., 1999, “Amplitude Reduction of Small-Amplitude Waviness in Transient Elastohydrodynamically Lubricated Line Contacts,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part J: J. Tribol., 213, pp. 487–504. [CrossRef]
Venner, C. H., and Lubrecht, A. A., 2000, Multilevel Methods in Lubrication, Elsevier, The Netherlands.
Hu, Y. Z., and Zhu, D., 2000, “A Full Numerical Solution to the Mixed Lubrication in Point Contacts,” ASME J. Tribol., 122(1), pp. 1–9. [CrossRef]
Ren, N., Zhu, D., Chen, W. W., and Wang, Q. J., 2010, “Plasto-Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication (PEHL) in Point Contacts,” J. Tribol., 132, p. 031501. [CrossRef]
Chapkov, A., Venner, C. H., and Lubrecht, A. A., 2006, “Roughness Amplitude Reduction Under Non-Newtonian EHD Lubrication Conditions,” ASME J. Tribol., 128(4), pp. 753–760. [CrossRef]
Zahouani, H., Mezghani, S., Vargiolu, R., and DursaptM., 2008, “Identification of Manufacturing Signature by 2D Wavelet Decomposition,” Wear, 264(5–6), pp. 480–485. [CrossRef]
El Mansori, M., Mezghani, S., Sabri, L., and Zahouani, H., 2010, “On Concept of Process Signature in Analysis of Multistage Surface Formation,” Surf. Eng., 26(3), pp. 216–223. [CrossRef]
Mezghani, S., Zahouani, H., and Piezanowski, J. J., 2011, “Multiscale Characterizations of Painted Surface Appearance by Continuous Wavelet Transform,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 211(2), pp. 205–211. [CrossRef]
Mezghani, S., Sura, E., and El Mansori, M., 2008, “The Effect of Belt Finishing Process Variables on the Topography of Finished Surface,” Tribol. Trans., 51(4), pp. 413–421. [CrossRef]
Demirci, I., Mezghani, S., Mkaddem, A., and ElMansori, M., 2010, “Effects of Abrasive Tools on Surface Finishing Under Brittle-Ductile Grinding Regimes When Manufacturing Glass,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 210(3), pp. 466–473. [CrossRef]
Xin, B., 2009, “Multiscale Analysis of Rough Groove Textures for Three-Dimensional Optical Measurements,” Opt. Eng., 48(7), p. 073602. [CrossRef]
Candès, E. J., and Guo, F., 2002, “New Multiscale Transforms, Minimum Total Variation Synthesis: Applications to Edge-Preserving Image Reconstruction,” Signal Process., 82(11), pp. 1519–1543. [CrossRef]
Rabinowicz, E., 1980, “Friction-Especially Low Friction,” Proceedings of the International Conference on the Fundamentals of Tribology, N. P.Suh and N.Saka, eds., The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 351–364.
Sabeur, M., Ibrahim, D., Hassan, Z., and Mohamed, E. M., 2013, “Energy Efficiency Optimization of Engine by Frictional Reduction of Functional Surfaces of Cylinder Ring–Pack System,” Tribol. Int., 59, pp. 240–247. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Film thickness and pressure profile for validation of the present study compared to the research of Hu and Zhu [44]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

(a) Original plateau-honed surface and its decomposition at different scales level from waviness to roughness with (b) 1.92 mm, (c) 0.96 mm, (d) 0.48 mm, (e) 0.24 mm, and (f) 0.12 mm scale

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Honed surface with different finer scale limit (a) original plateau-honed surface and surface after removing (b) 0.12 mm scale, (c) 0.24 mm scale, (d) 0.48 mm scale, and (e) 0.96 mm scale

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Fiction coefficient as a function of scale for u1 = 2 m⋅s–1 and (a) Srr = 2.0

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Contact load ratio as a function of scale for u1 = 2 m⋅s–1 and Srr = 2.0

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Fiction coefficient as a function of scale for u1 = 0.5 m⋅s–1 and Srr = 2.0

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Contact load ratio as a function of scale u1 = 0.5 m⋅s–1 and Srr = 2.0




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In