0
Research Papers: Hydrodynamic Lubrication

A Modified Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm for the Design of a Double-Pad Aerostatic Bearing With a Pocketed Orifice-Type Restrictor

[+] Author and Article Information
S. H. Chang

Advanced Institute of Manufacturing with
High-Tech Innovations,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
National Chung Cheng University,
Ming-Hsiung, Chia-Yi 62102, Taiwan
e-mail: jasperchang0314@gmail.com

Y. R. Jeng

Advanced Institute of Manufacturing with
High-Tech Innovations,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
National Chung Cheng University,
Ming-Hsiung, Chia-Yi 62102, Taiwan
e-mail: imeyrj@ccu.edu.tw

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Tribology Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TRIBOLOGY. Manuscript received May 23, 2013; final manuscript received November 10, 2013; published online December 27, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Prof. C. Fred Higgs III.

J. Tribol 136(2), 021701 (Dec 27, 2013) (7 pages) Paper No: TRIB-13-1108; doi: 10.1115/1.4026061 History: Received May 23, 2013; Revised November 10, 2013

The performance of an aerostatic bearing with a pocketed orifice-type restrictor is affected by the bearing size, pocket size, orifice design, supply pressure, and bearing load. This study proposes a modified particle swarm optimization (MPSO) algorithm to optimize a double-pad aerostatic bearing. In bearing optimization, the upper and lower bearing designs are independent and several design variables that affect bearing performance must be considered. This study also applies the concept of mutation from a genetic algorithm. The results show that the MPSO algorithm has a global search capability and high efficiency to optimize a problem with several design variables and that the mutation can provide an avenue for particles to escape from a local optimal value.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Belforte, G., Raparelli, T., Viktorov, V., and Trivella, A., 2007, “Discharge Coefficients of Orifice-Type Restrictor for Aerostatic Bearings,” Tribol. Int., 40, pp. 512–521. [CrossRef]
Chen, X. D., and He, X. M., 2006, “The Effect of the Recess Shape on Performance Analysis of the Gas-Lubricated Bearing in Optical Lithography,” Tribol. Int., 39, pp. 1336–1341. [CrossRef]
Li, Y., and Ding, H., 2007, “Influences of the Geometrical Parameters of Aerostatic Thrust Bearing With Pocketed Orifice-Type Restrictor on Its Performance,” Tribol. Int., 40, pp. 1120–1126. [CrossRef]
Schenk, C., Buschmann, S., Risse, S., Eberhardt, R., and Tunnermann, A., 2008, “Comparison between Flat Aerostatic Gas-Bearing Pads With Orifice and Porous Feedings at High–Vacuum Conditions,” Prec. Eng., 32, pp. 319–328. [CrossRef]
Chen, Y. S., Chiu, C. C., and Cheng, Y. D., 2010, “Influences of Operational Conditions and Geometric Parameters on the Stiffness of Aerostatic Journal Bearings,” Prec. Eng., 34, pp. 722–734. [CrossRef]
Ye, Y. X., Chen, X. D., Hu, Y. T., and Luo, X., 2010, “Effects of Recess Shapes on Pneumatic Hammering in Aerostatic Bearings,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part J: J. Eng. Tribol., 224, pp. 231–237. [CrossRef]
Talukder, H. M., and Stowell, T. B., 2003, “Pneumatic Hammer in an Externally Pressurized Orifice Compensated Air Journal Bearing,” Tribol. Int., 36, pp. 585–591. [CrossRef]
Bhat, N., Kumar, S., Tan, W., Narasimhan, R., and Low, T. C., 2012, “Performance of Inherently Compensated Flat Pad Aerostatic Bearings Subject to Dynamic Perturbation Forces,” Prec. Eng., 36, pp. 399–407. [CrossRef]
Jeng, Y. R., and Chang, S. H., 2013, “Comparison Between the Effects of Single-Pad and Double-Pad Aerostatic Bearings With Pocketed Orifices on Bearing Stiffness,” Tribol. Int., 66, pp. 12–18. [CrossRef]
Lu, C. J., and Wang, T. K., 2004, “New Designs of HDD Air-Lubricated Sliders via Topology Optimization,” ASME J. Tribol., 126, pp. 171–176. [CrossRef]
Jayson, E. M., and Talke, F. E., 2005, “Optimization of Air Bearing Contours for Shock Performance of a Hard Disk Drive,” ASME J. Tribol., 127, pp. 878–883. [CrossRef]
Qiu, M., Lu, J., and Yin, Y., 2009, “Numerical Analysis of Non-Newtonian TEHL Line Contact Problem based on Real-Coded Genetic Algorithm,” Tribol. Int., 42, pp. 1052–1060. [CrossRef]
Zhu, H., and Bogy, D. B., 2002, “DIRECT Algorithm and Its Application to Slider Air-Bearing Surface Optimization,” IEEE Trans. Magn., 38, pp. 2168–2170. [CrossRef]
Wang, N., Tsai, C. M., and Cha, K. C., 2009, “A Study of Parallel Efficiency of Modified DIRECT Algorithm Applied to Thermohydrodynamic Lubrication,” J. Mech., 25, pp. 143–150. [CrossRef]
Wang, N., and Cha, K. C., 2010, “Multi-Objective Optimization of Air Bearings Using Hypercube-Dividing Method,” Tribol. Int., 43, pp. 1631–1638. [CrossRef]
Kennedy, J., and Eberhart, R., 1995, “Particle Swarm Optimization,” IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, 4, pp. 1942–1948.
Eberhart, R. C., and Shi, Y., 2000, “Comparing Inertia Weights and Constriction Factors in Particle Swarm Optimization,” IEEE World Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 1, pp. 84–88.
Schutte, J. F., Koh, B. I., Reinbolt, J. A., Haftka, R. T., George, A. D., and Fregly, B. J., 2005, “Evaluation of a Particle Swarm Algorithm for Biomechanical Optimization,” ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 127, pp. 465–474. [CrossRef]
Khajehzadeh, M., El-Shafie, A., and Raihan, T. M., 2010, “Modified Particle Swarm Optimization for Probabilistic Slope Stability Analysis,” Int. J. Phys. Sci., 5(15), pp. 2248–2258.
Yan, Z. P., Deng, C., Zhou, J. J., and Chi, D. N., 2012, “A Novel Two-Subpopulation Particle Swarm Optimization,” IEEE World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, pp. 4113–4117. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

(a) A single-pad aerostatic bearing with an orifice-type restrictor. (b) Bearing and pocket designs.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Diagram of a double-pad aerostatic bearing

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Stiffness of the double-pad aerostatic bearing with the same designs of the upper and lower bearings

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Comparison of the PSO and MPSO algorithms in the first test problem (Np = 5; Vmax = 0.2; K = 0.73; mutation rate = 0%)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Search process using the MPSO algorithm in the first test problem (Np = 5; Vmax = 0.2; c1 = 2.0; c2 = 1.00; c3 = 1.1; mutation rate = 0%)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Performance of the MPSO algorithm combined with the concept of mutation in the second test problem (Np = 50; Vmax = 0.2; K = 0.58; c1 = 2.2; c2 = 1.0; c3 = 1.1)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Bearing optimization using the MPSO algorithm with a mutation rate of 0%

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Bearing optimization using the MPSO algorithm with a mutation rate of 1.0%

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Bearing optimization using the MPSO algorithm with a mutation rate of 5.0%

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Bearing optimization using the MPSO algorithm with a mutation rate of 10.0%

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Performance of the optimized double-pad aerostatic bearing (c = 40 μm; upper bearing: L = B = 0.05 m, l = b = 3 cm, Ps = 5 kg/cm2, do = 0.1 mm, Cd = 0.65; lower bearing: L = B = 0.05 m, l = b = 1 cm, Ps = 5 kg/cm2, do = 0.5 mm, Cd = 0.65)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Pocket size influence of the lower bearing on the stiffness (c = 40 μm; upper bearing: L = B = 0.05 m, l = b = 3 cm, Ps = 5 kg/cm2, do = 0.1 mm, Cd = 0.65; lower bearing: L = B = 0.05 m, Ps = 5 kg/cm2, do = 0.5 mm, Cd = 0.65)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In