0
Research Papers: Hydrodynamic Lubrication

Hybrid Analysis of Gas Annular Seals With Energy Equation

[+] Author and Article Information
Patrick J. Migliorini

Rotating Machinery and Controls
(ROMAC) Laboratory,
Department of Mechanical and
Aerospace Engineering,
University of Virginia,
122 Engineer's Way,
Charlottesville, VA 22904-4746
e-mail: pjm5b@virginia.edu

Alexandrina Untaroiu

Rotating Machinery and Controls
(ROMAC) Laboratory,
Department of Mechanical and
Aerospace Engineering,
University of Virginia,
122 Engineer's Way,
Charlottesville, VA 22904-4746
e-mail: au6d@virginia.edu

William C. Witt

Rotating Machinery and Controls
(ROMAC) Laboratory,
Department of Mechanical and
Aerospace Engineering,
University of Virginia,
122 Engineer's Way,
Charlottesville, VA 22904-4746
e-mail: wcw5dw@virginia.edu

Neal R. Morgan

Rotating Machinery and Controls
(ROMAC) Laboratory,
Department of Mechanical and
Aerospace Engineering,
University of Virginia,
122 Engineer's Way,
Charlottesville, VA 22904-4746
e-mail: nrm6dr@virginia.edu

Houston G. Wood

Professor
Rotating Machinery and Controls
(ROMAC) Laboratory,
Department of Mechanical and
Aerospace Engineering,
University of Virginia,
122 Engineer's Way,
Charlottesville, VA 22904-4746
e-mail: hgw9p@virginia.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Tribology Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TRIBOLOGY. Manuscript received July 9, 2013; final manuscript received January 16, 2014; published online March 27, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Luis San Andres.

J. Tribol 136(3), 031704 (Mar 27, 2014) (9 pages) Paper No: TRIB-13-1135; doi: 10.1115/1.4026590 History: Received July 09, 2013; Revised January 16, 2014

Annular seals are used in turbomachinery to reduce secondary flow between regions of high and low pressure. In a vibrating rotor system, the nonaxisymmetric pressure field developed in the small clearance between the rotor and the seal generate reactionary forces that can affect the stability of the entire rotor system. Traditionally, two analyses have been used to study the fluid flow in seals, bulk-flow analysis and computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Bulk-flow methods are computational inexpensive, but solve simplified equations that rely on empirically derived friction factor coefficients and are moderately accurate. CFD analyses generally provide more accurate results than bulk-flow codes, but solution time can vary between days and weeks. For gas damper seals, these analyses have been developed with the assumption that the flow can be treated as isothermal. However, some experimental studies have shown that the temperature change across the seal can be as much as 37%. Thus, a comprehensive analysis requires the solution of an energy equation. Recently, a new hybrid method that employs a CFD analysis for the zeroth-order flow and a bulk-flow analysis for the first-order, perturbed flow has been developed. This method has shown to compare well with full CFD analysis and experimental data while being computationally efficient. In this study, the previously developed hybrid method is extended to include the effects of nonisothermal flow. The hybrid method with energy equation is then compared with the isothermal hybrid method and experimental data for several test cases of hole-pattern seals and the importance of the use of energy equation is studied.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Hirs, G. G., 1973, “A Bulk-Flow Theory for Turbulence in Lubricant Films,” ASME J. Lubr. Technol., 95(2), pp. 137–145. [CrossRef]
Nelson, C. C., 1984, “Analysis for Leakage and Rotordynamic Coefficients of Surface-Roughened Tapered Annular Gas Seals,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 106(4), pp. 927–934. [CrossRef]
Nelson, C. C., 1985, “Rotordynamic Coefficients for Compressible Flow in Tapered Annular Seals,” ASME J. Tribol., 107(3), pp. 318–325. [CrossRef]
Ha, T. W., and Childs, D. W., 1994. “Annular Honeycomb-Stator Turbulent Gas Seal Analysis Using a New Friction-Factor Model Based on Flat Plate Tests,” ASME J. Tribol., 116(2), pp. 352–359. [CrossRef]
Kleynhans, G. F., and Childs, D. W., 1997, “The Acoustic Influence of Cell Depth on the Rotordynamic Characteristics of Smooth-Rotor/Honeycomb-Stator Annular Gas Seals,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 119(4), pp. 949–956. [CrossRef]
Shin, Y. S., and Childs, D. W., 2008, “The Impact of Real Gas Properties on Predictions of Static and Rotordynamic Properties of the Annular Gas Seals for Injection Compressors,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 130(4), p. 042504. [CrossRef]
Childs, D. W., and Wade, J., 2004, “Rotordynamic-Coefficient and Leakage Characteristics for Hole-Pattern-Stator Annular Gas Seals-Measurements Versus Predictions,” ASME J. Tribol., 126(2), pp. 326–333. [CrossRef]
Moore, J. J., 2003, “Three-Dimensional CFD Rotordynamic Analysis of Gas Labyrinth Seals,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 125(4), pp. 427–433. [CrossRef]
Untaroiu, A., Dimond, T. W., Allaire, P. E., and Armentrout, R., 2009, “CFD Analysis of a Canned Pump Rotor Considering an Annular Fluid With Axial Flow,” Proc. ASME 48876; Volume 6: Structures and Dynamics, Parts A and B, January 1, 2009, pp. 1013–1022. [CrossRef]
Untaroiu, A., Untaroiu, C. D., Wood, H. G., and Allaire, P. E., 2013, “Numerical Modeling of Fluid-Induced Rotordynamic Forces in Seals With Large Aspect Ratios,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 135(1), p. 012501. [CrossRef]
Chochua, G., and Soulas, T. A., 2007, “Numerical Modeling of Rotordynamic Coefficients for Deliberately Roughened Stator Gas Annular Seals,” ASME J. Tribol., 129(2), pp. 424–429. [CrossRef]
Yan, X., Li, J., and Feng, Z., 2011, “Investigations on the Rotordynamic Characteristics of a Hole-Pattern Seal Using Transient CFD and Periodic Circular Orbit Model,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 133(4), p. 041007. [CrossRef]
Yan, X., He, K., Li, J., and Feng, Z., 2012, “Rotordynamic Performance Prediction for Surface-Roughened Seal Using Transient Computational Fluid Dynamics and Elliptical Orbit Model,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part A, 226(8), pp. 975–988. [CrossRef]
Nielson, K. K., Jonck, K., and Underbakke, H., 2012, “Hole-Pattern and Honeycomb Seal Rotordynamic Forces: Validation of CFD-Based Prediction Techniques,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 134, pp. 122505. [CrossRef]
Migliorini, P. J., Untaroiu, A., Wood, H. G., and Allaire, P. E., 2012, “A CFD/Bulk-Flow Hybrid Method for Determining Rotordynamic Coefficients of Annular Gas Seals,” ASME J. Tribol, 134(2), p. 022202. [CrossRef]
Hélène, M., Arghir, M., and Frĕne, J., 2005, “Combined Navier-Stokes and Bulk-Flow Analysis of Hybrid Bearings: Radial and Angled Injection,” ASME J. Tribol., 127(3), pp. 557–567. [CrossRef]
Childs, D., 1993, Turbomachinery Rotordynamics: Phenomena, Modeling, and Analysis, Wiley, New York.
Al-Qutub, A. M., Elrod, D., and Coleman, H. W., 2000, “A New Friction Factor Model and Entrance Loss Coefficient for Honeycomb Annular Gas Seals,” ASME J. Tribol., 122(3), pp. 622–627. [CrossRef]
Childs, D. W., Kheireddin, B., Phillips, S., and Asirvatham, T. D., 2011, “Friction Factor Behavior From Flat-Plate Tests of Smooth and Hole-Pattern Roughened Surfaces With Supply Pressures up to 84 Bars,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 133(9), p. 092504. [CrossRef]
Holt, C. G., and Childs, D. W., 2002, “Theory Versus Experiment for the Rotordynamic Impedances of Two Hole-Pattern Stator Gas Annular,” ASME J. Tribol., 124(1), pp. 137–143. [CrossRef]
ANSYS Academic Research, Release 13.0, ANSYS Help System, CFD-Post, ANSYS, Inc., Canonsburg, PA.
McGreehan, W. F., and Ko, S. H., 1989, “Power Dissipation in Smooth and Honeycomb Labyrinth Seals,” ASME IGTI Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exposition, ASME Paper No. 89-GT-220.
Wade, J. L., 2004, “Test Versus Predictions for Rotordynamic Coefficients and Leakage Rates of Hole-Pattern Gas Seals at Two Clearances in Choked and Unchoked Conditions,” M.S. thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Seal model and computational domain

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Pressure profile for Case 1: PR = 0.27 and ω = 10,200 rpm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Rotor friction factor for Case 1: PR = 0.27 and ω = 10,200 rpm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Stator friction factor for Case 1: PR = 0.27 and ω = 10,200 rpm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Bulk mean temperature profiles for (a) Case 1, (b) Case 2, (c) Case 3, and (d) Case 4

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Bulk mean density profiles for (a) Case 1, (b) Case 2, (c) Case 3, and (d) Case 4

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Frequency dependent coefficients for Case 1: PR = 0.27 and ω = 10,200 RPM, (a) K, (b) k, (c) C, and (d) c

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Frequency dependent coefficients for Case 2: PR = 0.27 and ω = 20,200 RPM, (a) K, (b) k, (c) C, and (d) c

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In