Research Papers: Hydrodynamic Lubrication

The Effects of Anisotropic Surface Topography and Relative Motion on Hydrodynamic Lubrication

[+] Author and Article Information
Yang Yang

Institute of Applied Mechanics,
Clausthal University of Technology,
Clausthal-Zellerfeld 38678, Germany
e-mail: yang.yang@tu-clausthal.de

Gunther Brenner

Institute of Applied Mechanics,
Clausthal University of Technology,
Clausthal-Zellerfeld 38678, Germany
e-mail: gunther.brenner@tu-clausthal.de

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Tribology Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TRIBOLOGY. Manuscript received April 2, 2013; final manuscript received March 23, 2014; published online April 25, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Robert L. Jackson.

J. Tribol 136(3), 031705 (Apr 25, 2014) (7 pages) Paper No: TRIB-13-1074; doi: 10.1115/1.4027293 History: Received April 02, 2013; Accepted March 23, 2014; Revised March 23, 2014

According to the extended Reynolds theory, surface roughness contributes to the pressure buildup as well as shear stress and transport in the film flow. The effect is usually quantified using pressure and shear flow factors. The influence of the pattern directionality relative to the sliding motion may be considered using an anisotropic model of flow factors. The goal of the present study is to quantify these effects based on a precise numerical solution of the Navier–Stokes equations. For the computation the open source finite volume code OpenFOAM is used. The computational setup allows consideration of the lubrication film between two rough surfaces in relative motion. The roughness of the surfaces is simplified and parameterized using trigonometric functions.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Hamilton, D., Walowit, J., and Allen, C., 1966, “A Theory of Lubrication by Microirregularities,” ASME J. Basic Eng., 88(1), pp. 177–185. [CrossRef]
Patir, N., and Cheng, H., 1978, “An Average Flow Model for Determining Effects of 3D Roughness on Partial Hydrodynamic Lubrication,” ASME J. Tribol., 100(1), pp. 12–17. [CrossRef]
Patir, N., and Cheng, H., 1979, “Application of Average Flow Model to Lubrication Between Rough Sliding Surfaces,” ASME J. Lub. Tech., 101(2), pp. 220–229. [CrossRef]
Letalleur, N., Plourabou, F., and Prat, M., 2002, “Average Flow Model of Rough Surface Lubrication: Flow Factors for Sinusoidal Surfaces,” ASME J. Tribol., 124(3), pp. 539–546. [CrossRef]
Sahlin, F., Almqvist, A., Larsson, R., and Glavatskih, S., 2007, “Rough Surface Flow Factors in Full Film Lubrication Based on a Homogenization Technique,” Tribol. Int., 40, pp. 1025–1034. [CrossRef]
Knoll, G., and Lagemann, V., 2007, “Simulationsverfahren zur tribologischen Kennwertbildung rauer Oberflchen, Teil 1-Einfluss der bearbeitungsbedingten Oberflche auf die hydrodynamische Tragfhigkeit geschmierter Kontakte,” Tribol. Schmierungstech., 49, pp. 12–15.
Brenner, G., Al-Zoubi, A. M., Mukinovic, H. S., and Swoboda, S., 2007, “Numerical Simulation of Surface Roughness Effects in Laminar Lubrication Using the Lattice-Boltzmann Method,” ASME J. Tribol., 129(3), pp. 603–610. [CrossRef]
Tripp, J., 1983, “Surface Roughness Effects in Hydrodynamic Lubrication: The Flow Factor Method,” ASME J. Lub. Tech., 105(3), pp. 458–463. [CrossRef]
Lo, S.-W., 1992, “On the Effects of Roughness Orientation”A Mapping and Double Scale Analysis of Flow Factors,” ASME J. Tribol., 114(4), pp. 747–754. [CrossRef]
Li, W.-L., Weng, C.-I., and Hwang, C.-C., 1997, “An Average Reynolds Equation for Non-Newtonian Fluid With Application to the Lubrication of the Magnetic Head-Disk Interface,” Tribol. Trans., 40(1), pp. 111–119. [CrossRef]
Li, W.-L., 2000, “Some Discussions on the Flow Factor Tensor” Considerations of Roughness Orientation and Flow Rheology,” ASME J. Tribol., 122(4), pp. 869–871. [CrossRef]
Tala-Ighil, N., Maspeyrot, P., Fillon, M., and Bounif, A., 2007, “Effects of Surface Texture on Journal-Bearing Characteristics Under Steady-State Operating Conditions,” J. Eng. Tribol., 221, pp. 623–633.
Nanbu, T., Ren, N., Yasuda, Y., Zhu, D., and Wang, Q., 2008, “Micro-Textures in Concentrated Conformal-Contact Lubrication: Effects of Texture Bottom Shape and Surface Relative Motion,” Tribol. Lett., 29, pp. 241–252. [CrossRef]
Ren, N., Zhu, D., Chen, W., Liu, Y., and Wang, Q., 2009, “A 3D Deterministic Model for Rough Surface Line-Contact EHL Problems,” ASME J. Tribol., 131(1), p. 011501. [CrossRef]
Zhu, D., and Wang, Q., 2013, “Effect of Roughness Orientation on the Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication Film Thickness,” ASME J. Tribol., 135(3), p. 031501. [CrossRef]
White, J., 2013, “Surface Roughness Effects in the Region Between High Wave Number and High Bearing Number Limited Lubricant Flows,” ASME J. Tribol., 135(4), p. 041706. [CrossRef]
Sahlin, F., 2005, “Hydrodynamic Lubrication of Rough Surfaces,” Licentiate thesis, Luleå University of Technology, Sweden.
Sahlin, F., Glavatskih, S., Almqvist, A., and Larsson, R., 2005, “Two-Dimensional CFD-Analysis of Micro-Patterned Surfaces in Hydrodynamic Lubrication,” ASME J. Tribol., 127(1), pp. 96–102. [CrossRef]
Elrod, H., 1978, “A General Theory for Laminar Lubrication With Reynolds Roughness,” ASME J. Lub. Tech., 110(1), pp. 8–14. [CrossRef]
Arghir, M., Roucou, N., Helene, M., and Frene, J., 2003, “Theoretical Analysis of the Incompressible Laminar Flow in a Macro-Roughness Cell,” ASME J. Tribol., 125(2), pp. 309–318. [CrossRef]
Billy, F., Arghir, M., and Pineau, G., 2006, “Navier–-Stokes Analysis of a Regular Two-Dimensional Roughness Pattern Under Turbulent Flow Regime,” ASME J. Tribol., 128(1), pp. 122–130. [CrossRef]
Kraker, A., Ostayen, R. A. V., Beek, A. V., and Rixen, D. J., 2007, “A Multiscale Method Modeling Surface Texture Effects,” ASME J. Tribol., 129(2), pp. 221–230. [CrossRef]
Ramesh, A., Akram, W., Mishra, S., Cannon, A., Polycarpou, A., and King, W., 2013, “Friction Characteristics of Microtextured Surfaces Under Mixed and Hydrodynamic Lubrication,” Tribol. Int., 57, pp. 170–176. [CrossRef]
Brajdic-Mitidieri, P., Gosman, A., Ioannides, E., and Spikes, H., 2005, “CFD Analysis of a Low Friction Pocketed Pad Bearing,” ASME J. Tribol., 127(4), pp. 803–812. [CrossRef]
Prat, M., Plourabou, F., and Letalleur, N., 2002, “Averaged Reynolds Equation for Flow Between Rough Surfaces in Sliding Motion,” Transp. Porous Media, 48, pp. 291–313. [CrossRef]
Jasak, H., Jemcov, A., and Tukovic, Z., 2007, “OpenFOAM: A C++ library for Complex Physics Simulations,” International Workshop on Coupled Methods in Numerical Dynamics, IUC, Dubrovnik, Croatia.
Jasak, H., and Tukovic, Z., 2007, “Automatic Mesh Motion for the Unstructured Finite Volume Method,” Trans. FAMENA, 30(2), pp. 1–18.
Jasak, H., and Rusche, H., 2009, “Dynamic Mesh Handling in OpenFOAM,” Proceeding of the 47th Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, FL.
Löhner, R., and Yang, C., 1996, “Improved ALE Mesh Velocities for Moving Bodies,” Commun. Num. Meth. Eng., 12, pp. 599–608. [CrossRef]
Hu, J., and Leutheusser, H., 1997, “Micro-Inertia Effects in Laminar Thin-Film Flow Past a Sinusoidal Boundary,” ASME J. Tribol., 119(1), pp. 211–216. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Sketch of rough surfaces in relative motion

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Sketch of the 2D computational domains

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Sketch of the 2D surface structure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Surface configurations investigated in the present study

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

2D computational domain and mesh changing in time, with period T

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Flow factors depending on the dimensionless gap size

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Comparison of velocity profiles, obtained using the steady-state and the transient approach in OpenFOAM

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Shear flow factor for flow in a wavy channel with sliding motion

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Pressure flow factor for flow in a wavy channel

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Flow factors for flow in an isotropic wavy channel with sliding motion

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Shear flow factor for flow in wavy channel with roughness anisotropy in sliding motion

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Pressure flow factor for flow in wavy channel with roughness anisotropy




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In