0
Research Papers: Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication

Occurrence of High Pressure Spike in Unidirectional Start–Stop–Start Point Contacts

[+] Author and Article Information
P. Sperka

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering,
Institute of Machine and Industrial Design,
Brno University of Technology,
Technicka 2896/2,
Brno 61669, Czech Republic
e-mail: sperka@fme.vutbr.cz

J. Wang

School of Mechanical Engineering,
Qingdao Technological University,
Qingdao 266033, China
e-mail: 18669723895@163.com

I. Krupka

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering,
Institute of Machine and Industrial Design,
Brno University of Technology,
Technicka 2896/2,
Brno 61669, Czech Republic
e-mail: krupka@fme.vutbr.cz

M. Hartl

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering,
Institute of Machine and Industrial Design,
Brno University of Technology,
Technicka 2896/2,
Brno 61669, Czech Republic
e-mail: hartl@fme.vutbr.cz

M. Kaneta

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering,
Institute of Machine and Industrial Design,
Brno University of Technology,
Technicka 2896/2,
Brno 61669, Czech Republic
e-mail: kaneta@fme.vutbr.cz

Contributed by the Tribology Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TRIBOLOGY. Manuscript received November 25, 2013; final manuscript received July 1, 2014; published online August 4, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Dong Zhu.

J. Tribol 136(4), 041503 (Aug 04, 2014) (8 pages) Paper No: TRIB-13-1241; doi: 10.1115/1.4028029 History: Received November 25, 2013; Revised July 01, 2014

The transient film thickness and pressure distributions in point elastohydrodynamic lubrication (EHL) contacts during start–stop–start motion are discussed based on experimental and numerical analyses. When the machine element starts to move after the stopping, where the oil is entrapped between two surfaces, the pressure at the exit area increases very much. The pressure increase depends markedly on the overall film thickness before the stopping of the motion, but is hardly controlled by the acceleration after the stopping. It can be considered that this phenomenon affects the rolling contact fatigue damage.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Sugimura, J., Jones, W. R., and Spikes, H. A., 1998, “EHD Film Thickness in Non-Steady State Contacts,” ASME J. Tribl., 120(3), pp. 442–452. [CrossRef]
Ai, X., and Yu, H., 1988, “A Full Numerical Solution for General Transient Elastohydrodynamic Line Contacts and Its Application,” Wear, 121(2), pp. 143–159. [CrossRef]
Hooke, C. J., 1994, “The Minimum Film Thickness in Lubricated Line Contacts During a Reversal of Entrainment—General Solution and the Development of a Design Chart,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part J, 208, pp. 53–64. [CrossRef]
Nishikawa, H., Handa, K., and Kaneta, M., 1995, “Behavior of EHL Films in Reciprocating Motion,” JSME Int. J., Ser. C, 38, pp. 558–567.
Glovnea, R. P., and Spikes, H. A., 2001, “Elastohydrodynamic Film Collapse During Rapid Deceleration: Part I & II,” ASME J. Tribol., 123(2), pp. 254–267. [CrossRef]
Zhao., J., and Sadeghi, F., 2003, “Analysis of EHL Circular Contact Shut Down,” ASME J. Tribol., 125(1), pp. 76–90. [CrossRef]
Ohno, N., and Yamada, S., 2007, “Effect of High-Pressure Rheology of Lubricants Upon Entrapped Oil Film Behavior at Halting Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part J, 215(3), pp. 279–285. [CrossRef]
Wang, J., Venner, C. H., and Lubrecht, A. A., 2013, “Influence of Surface Waviness on the Thermal Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication of an Eccentric-Tappet Pair,” ASME J. Tribol., 135(2), p. 021001. [CrossRef]
Krupka, I., Hartl, M., and Liska, M., 1999, “Elastohydrodynamic Film Thickness Mapping by Computer Differential Colorimetry,” Tribol. Trans., 42(2), pp. 361–368. [CrossRef]
Krupka, I., Svoboda, P., and Hartl, M., 2010, “Effect of Surface Topography on Mixed Lubrication Film Formation During Start Up Under Rolling/Sliding Conditions,” Tribol. Int., 43(5–6), pp. 1035–1042. [CrossRef]
Dowson, D., and Higginson, G. R., 1966, Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication, Pergamon, Oxford, UK.
Rölands, C. J. A., Vulgter, J. C., and Waltermann, H. I., 1963, “The Viscosity Temperature Pressure Relationship of Lubrication Oils and Its Correlation With Chemical Constitution,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 85(4), pp. 601–607. [CrossRef]
Venner, C. H., and Lubrecht, A. A., 2000, Multilevel Methods in Lubrication, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Liu, X., Jiang, M., Yang, P., and Kaneta, M., 2005, “Non-Newtonian Thermal Analyses of Point EHL Contacts Using the Eyring Model,” ASME. J. Tribol., 127(1), pp. 70–81. [CrossRef]
Safa, M. M. A., and Gohar, R., 1986, “Pressure Distribution Under a Ball Impacting a Thin Lubricant Layer,” ASME J. Tribol., 108(3), pp. 372–376. [CrossRef]
Larsson, R., and Höglund, E., 1995, “Numerical Simulation of a Ball Impacting and Rebounding a Lubricated Surface,” ASME J. Tribol., 117(1), pp. 94–105. [CrossRef]
Dowson, D., and Wang, D., 1995, “Impact Elastohydrodynamics,” Proceedings of the 21st Leeds-Lyon Symposium on Tribology, D.Dowson, C. Taylor, T. Childs, and G. Dalmaz, eds., Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 565–582.
Venner, C. H., and Ten Napel, W. E., 1990, “Numerical Calculations of the Pressure Spike in Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication,” Lubr. Sci., 2(4), pp.321–335. [CrossRef]
Goodyer, C. E., Fairlier, R., Hart, D. E., Berzins, M., and Scales, L. E., 2004, “Calculation of Friction in Steady-State and Transient EHL Simulations,” Proceedings of the 30th Leeds-Lyon Symposium on Tribology, G. Dalmaz, A. A. Lubrecht, D. Dowson, and M. Priest, eds., Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 579–590.
Kaneta, M., Guo, F., Wang, J., Krupka, I., and Hartl, M., 2013, “Pressure Increase in Elliptical Impact Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication Contacts With Longitudinal Asperities,” ASME J. Tribol., 135(1), p. 011503. [CrossRef]
Kaneta, M., Guo, F., Wang, J., Krupka, I., and Hartl, M., 2013, “Formation of Micro-Grooves Under Impact Loading in Elliptical Contacts With Surface Ridges,” Tribol. Int., 65, pp. 336–345. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Unidirectional start–stop–start motion

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Time variation of film thickness contour maps obtained by experiment and numerical simulation; Vmax = 0.0351 m/s, pH = 0.65 GPa, θ = 16.6 °C, t0 = 0 ms, t1 = 14 ms, t2 = 40.7 ms, t3 = 45 ms, αd = 2.51 m/s2, and αa = 8.16 m/s2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Midplane film thickness profiles along rolling direction corresponding to Fig. 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Time variations of midplane film thickness and pressure distributions along rolling direction: Vmax = 0.045 m/s, pH = 1 GPa, t0 = 0 ms, t1 = 15 ms, t2 = 40 ms, t3 = 55 ms, αd = 3 m/s2, and αa = 3 m/s2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Time variation of pressure distributions perpendicular to rolling direction: Vmax = 0.045 m/s, pH = 1 GPa, t0 = 0 ms, t1 = 15 ms, t2 = 40 ms, t3 = 55 ms, αd = 3 m/s2, and αa = 3 m/s2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Effect of acceleration on maximum pressure spike: Vmax = 0.045 m/s, pH = 1 GPa, t0 = 0 ms, t1 = 15 ms, t2 = 40 ms, and αd = 3 m/s2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Effect of stopping time on maximum pressure spike: Vmax = 0.045 m/s, pH = 1 GPa, t0 = 0 ms, t1 = 15 ms, t2 = 16 ms, t3 = 31 ms, αd = 3 m/s2, and αa = 3 m/s2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Effect of maximum uniform velocity on maximum pressure spike: pH = 1 GPa, αd = 6 m/s2, αa = 6 m/s2, t0 = 0 ms, and t2t1 = 25 ms

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Effect of deceleration on maximum pressure spike: pH = 1 GPa, αa = 6 m/s2, t0 = 0 ms, and t2t1 = 25 ms

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In