Research Papers: Contact Mechanics

A New Three-Dimensional Numerical Model of Rough Contact: Influence of Mode of Surface Deformation on Real Area of Contact and Pressure Distribution

[+] Author and Article Information
A. Jourani

Laboratoire Roberval,
Centre de Recherches de Royallieu,
Université de Technologie de Compiègne,
CNRS UMR 6253, BP20259,
Compiegne 60205, France
e-mail: abdeljalil.jourani@utc.fr

Contributed by the Tribology Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TRIBOLOGY. Manuscript received February 25, 2014; final manuscript received August 10, 2014; published online September 5, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Mircea Teodorescu.

J. Tribol 137(1), 011401 (Sep 05, 2014) (11 pages) Paper No: TRIB-14-1045; doi: 10.1115/1.4028286 History: Received February 25, 2014; Revised August 10, 2014

Surface roughness causes contact to occur only at discrete spots called microcontacts. In the deterministic models real area of contact and pressure field are widely evaluated using Flamant and Boussinesq equations for two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D), respectively. In this paper, a new 3D geometrical contact approach is developed. It models the roughness by cones and uses the concept of representative strain at each asperity. To discuss the validity of this model, a numerical solution is introduced by using the spectral method and another 3D geometrical approach which models the roughness by spheres. The real area of contact and the pressure field given by these approaches show that the conical model is almost insensitive to the degree of isotropy of the rough surfaces, which is not the case for the spherical model that is only valid for quasi-isotropic surfaces. The comparison between elastic and elastoplastic models reveals that for a surface with a low roughness, the elastic approach is sufficient to model the rough contact. However, for surfaces having a great roughness, the elastoplastic approach is more appropriate to determine the real area of contact and pressure distribution. The results of this study show also that the roughness scale modifies the real contact area and pressure distribution. The surfaces characterized by high frequencies are less resistant in contact and present the lowest real area of contact and the most important mean pressure.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Greenwood, J. A., and Willamson, J. B. P., 1966, “Contact of Nominally Flat Surfaces,” Proc. R. Soc. A, 295(1442), pp. 300–319. [CrossRef]
Greenwood, J. A., and Tripp, J. H., 1970, “The Contact of Two Nominally Flat Rough Surfaces,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., 185(1), pp. 625–633. [CrossRef]
Bush, A. W., Gibson, R. D., and Thomas, T. R., 1975, “The Elastic Contact of a Rough Surface,” Wear, 35(1), pp. 87–111. [CrossRef]
Johnson, K. L., 1970, “The Correlation of Indentation Experiments,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 18(2), pp. 115–126. [CrossRef]
Gelink, E. R. M., and Schipper, D. J., 1999, “Deformation of Rough Line Contacts,” ASME J. Tribol., 121(3), pp. 449–454. [CrossRef]
Polycarpou, A. A., and Etsion, I., 1999, “Analytical Approximations in Modeling Contacting Rough Surfaces,” ASME J. Tribol., 121(2), pp. 234–239. [CrossRef]
Liu, Z., Neville, A., and Reuben, R. L., 2000, “An Analytical Solution for Elastic and Elastic–Plastic Contact Models,” Tribol. Trans., 43(4), pp. 627–634. [CrossRef]
Kogut, L., and Etsion, I., 2002, “Elastic-Plastic Contact Analysis of a Sphere and a Rigid Flat,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 69(5), pp. 657–662. [CrossRef]
Gao, H., Barber, G. C., Rama, S. C., and Smith, L. M., 2002, “Finite Element Modeling of Contact of a Paper-Based Friction Material,” Tribol. Trans., 45(1), pp. 31–38. [CrossRef]
Warren, A. W., and Guo, Y. B., 2005, “Numerical Investigation on the Effects of Machining-Induced White Layer During Rolling Contact,” Tribol. Trans., 48(3), pp. 436–441. [CrossRef]
Eid, H., and George, G. A., 2007, “An Elastic–Plastic Finite Element Analysis of Interacting Asperities in Contact With a Rigid Flat,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 40(23), pp. 7432–7439. [CrossRef]
Jackson, R. L., Green, I., and Quicksall, J. J., 2004, “Elasto-Plastic Hemispherical Contact Models for Various Mechanical Properties,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part J, 218(4), pp. 13–322. [CrossRef]
Eid, H., Adams, G. G., McGruer, N. E., Fortini, A., Buldyrev, S., and Srolovitz, D., 2011, “A Combined Molecular Dynamics and Finite Element Analysis of Contact and Adhesion of a Rough Sphere and a Flat Surface,” Tribol. Trans., 54(6), pp. 920–928. [CrossRef]
Flamant, A., 1892, Comptes Rendus, Vol. 114, Académie des Sciences, Paris, France, p. 1465.
Boussinesq, J., 1880, Application des Potentiels à l’étude de l’équilibre et du Mouvement des Solides Elastiques, Librairie Scientifique et Technique Albert Blanchard, Paris, France.
Hu, Y. Z., and Tonder, K., 1992, “Simulation of 3D Random Surface by 2D Digital Filter and Fourier Analysis,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 32(1–2), pp. 83–90. [CrossRef]
Webster, M. N., and Sayles, R. S., 1986, “A Numerical Model for the Elastic Frictionless Contact of Real Rough Surfaces,” ASME J. Tribol., 108(3), pp. 314–320. [CrossRef]
Ren, N., and Lee, S., 1993, “Contact Simulation of Three-Dimensional Rough Surfaces Using Moving Grid Method,” ASME J. Tribol., 115(4), pp. 597–601. [CrossRef]
Poon, C. Y., and Sayles, R. S., 1994, “Numerical Contact Model of a Smooth Ball on an Anisotropic Rough Surface,” ASME J. Tribol., 116(2), pp. 194–201. [CrossRef]
Jackson, R. L., and Streator, J. L., 2006, “A Multi-Scale Model for Contact Between Rough Surfaces,” Wear, 261(11–12), pp. 1337–1347. [CrossRef]
Ju, Y., and Farris, T. N., 1996, “Spectral Analysis of Two-Dimensional Contact Problems,” ASME J. Tribol., 118(2), pp. 320–328. [CrossRef]
Liu, G., Wang, Q. J., and Lin, C., 1999, “A Survey of Current Models for Simulating the Contact Between Rough Surfaces,” Tribol. Trans., 42(3), pp. 581–591. [CrossRef]
Wang, Z. J., Wang, W. Z., Hu, Y. Z., and Wang, H., 2010, “A Numerical Elastic-Plastic Contact Model for Rough Surfaces,” Tribol. Trans., 53(20), pp. 224–238. [CrossRef]
Tian, X., and Bushan, B., 1996, “A Numerical Three-Dimensional Model for the Contact of Rough Surfaces by Variational Principle,” ASME J. Tribol., 118(1), pp. 33–42. [CrossRef]
Stanley, H. M., and Kato, T., 1997, “An FFT-Based Method for Rough Surface Contact,” ASME J. Tribol., 119(3), pp. 481–485. [CrossRef]
Liu, Z. Q., Neville, A., and Reuben, R. L., 2001, “Analyzing Elastic-Plastic Real Rough Surface Contact in Running-In,” Tribol. Trans., 44(3), pp. 428–436. [CrossRef]
Lubrecht, A. A., and Ioannides, E., 1989, “A Fast Solution of the Dry Contact Problem and the Associated Sub-Surface Stress Field,” ASME J. Tribol., 113(1), pp. 128–133. [CrossRef]
Bjorklund, S., and Andersson, S., 1994, “A Numerical Method for Real Elastic Contacts Subjected to Normal and Tangential Loading,” Wear, 179(1–2), pp. 117–122. [CrossRef]
Hertz, H., 1881, “On the Elastic Contact of Elastic Solids,” J. Reine Angew. Math., 92, pp. 156–171.
Tabor, D., 1951, The Hardness of Metals, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Johnson, K. L., 1985, Contact Mechanics, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.
Francis, H., 1976, “Phenomenological Analysis of Plastic Spherical Indentation,” ASME J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 98(3), pp. 272–281. [CrossRef]
Chang, W. R., Etsion, I., and Bogy, D. B., 1987 “An Elastic–Plastic Model for the Contact of Rough Surfaces,” ASME J. Tribol., 109(2), pp. 257–263. [CrossRef]
Zhao, Y., Maietta, D. M., and Chang, L., 2000 “An Asperity Microcontact Model Incorporating the Transition From Elastic Deformation to Fully Plastic Flow,” ASME J. Tribol., 122(1), pp. 86–93. [CrossRef]
Liu, Z., Sun, J., and Shen, W., 2002, “Study of Plowing and Friction at the Surfaces of Plastic Deformed Metals,” Tribol. Int., 35(8), pp. 511–522. [CrossRef]
Jourani, A., 2014, “Three-Dimensional Modeling of Temperature Distribution during Belt Finishing,” Int. J. Surf. Sci. Eng. (in press).
Jourani, A., Hagège, B., Bouvier, S., Bigerelle, M., and Zahouani, H., 2013, “Influence of Abrasive Grain Geometry on Friction Coefficient and Wear Rate in Belt Finishing,” Tribol. Int., 59, pp. 30–37. [CrossRef]
Yongqing, J., and Linqing, Z., 1992, “A Full Numerical Solution for the Elastic Contact of Three-Dimensional Real Rough Surfaces,” Wear, 157(1), pp. 151–161. [CrossRef]
Jourani, A., Bigerelle, M., Petit, L., and Zahouani, H., 2010, “Local Coefficient of Friction, Sub-Surface Stresses and Temperature Distribution During Sliding Contact,” Int. J. Mater. Prod. Technol., 38(1), pp. 44–56. [CrossRef]
Jourani, A., Dursapt, M., Hamdi, H., Rech, J., and Zahouani, H., 2005 “Effect of the Belt Grinding on the Surface Texture: Modeling of the Contact and Abrasive Wear,” Wear, 259(7–12), pp. 1137–1143. [CrossRef]
Fuller, K. N. G., and Tabor, D., 1975, “The Effect of Surface Roughness on the Adhesion of Elastic Solids,” Proc. R. Soc. A, 345(1642), pp. 327–342. [CrossRef]
Johnson, K. L., 1976, “Adhesion at the Contact of Solids,” Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, W. T.Koiter, North Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 133–143.
Pashley, M. D., Pethica, J. B., and Tabor, D., 1984, “Adhesion and Micro Mechanical Properties of Metal Surfaces,” Wear, 100(1–3), pp. 7–31. [CrossRef]
Jourani, A., 2014, “Effect of Roughness Geometries in Contact Mechanics,” Int. J. Mater. Prod. Technol. (in press).
Jourani, A., Dellaleau, A., Dursapt, M., Hamdi, H., Sidoroff, F., and Zahouani, H., 2005, “Effect of Local Slopes of Roughness During Contact Between Solids,” Rev. Eur. Elem., 14(2–3), pp. 271–286.
Li, G., Huang, Y., Lin, Y., and Pan, X., 2013, “Multifractal Analysis of Frictional Vibration in the Running-in Process,” Tribol. Trans., 56(2), pp. 284–289. [CrossRef]
Majumdar, A., and Bhushan, B., 1990, “Role of Fractal Geometry in Roughness Characterization and Contact Mechanics of Surfaces,” ASME J. Tribol., 112(2), pp. 205–216. [CrossRef]
Majumdar, A., and Tien, C. L., 1990, “Fractal Characterization and Simulation of Rough Surfaces,” Wear, 136(2), pp. 313–327. [CrossRef]
Kogut, L., and Jackson, R. L., 2005, “A Comparison of Contact Modeling Utilizing Statistical and Fractal Approaches,” ASME J. Tribol., 128(1), pp. 213–217. [CrossRef]
Mezghani, S., Jourani, A., and Zahouani, H., 2006, “The Scale Effect Of Roughness In Contact Problems,” WIT Trans. Built Environ., 85, pp. 369–378.
Jourani, A., and Bouvier, S., 2014, “Friction and Wear Mechanisms of 316L Stainless Steel in Dry Sliding Contact: Effect of Abrasive Particle Size,” Tribol. Trans., (in press).
Petit, L., Bigerelle, M., Jourani, A., Dore, E., Prelle, C., and Lamarque, F., 2010, “Presentation of a New Method to Measure the Friction Coefficient Using an Electromagnetic Digital Device,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part J, 224(9), pp. 1019–1026. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Spherical and conical indentation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Presentation of the summits of the roughness by deformable indenters

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Conical geometry of an asperity i

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

(a) Sanded surface; (b) localization of summits of sanded surface; and (c) pressure distribution

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Comparison between spectral method and matrix store method by using a sanded surface

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Topographies of surfaces: (a) unidirectional ground surface (Ra = 0.23 μm) and (b) sanded surface (Ra = 7.52 μm)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Evolution of displacement as function of the normal load for a unidirectional ground surface by using the two geometrical models and spectral method

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Evolution of displacement as function of the normal load for sanded surface by using the two geometrical models and spectral method

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Indentation curves: (a) ground surface and (b) sanded surface [44]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Contact area ratio Ar for the ground and sanded surface by using elastoplastic spherical and conical models

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Contact area ratio Ar as function of nominal contact pressure for the ground surface by using the spectral method and elastoplastic conical model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Contact area ratio Ar as function of nominal contact pressure for the sanded surface by using the spectral method (elastic) and elastoplastic conical model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13 (a)

Sanded surface (original surface); low-pass filtering of sanded surface: (b) λf = 20 mm−1; (c) λf = 10 mm−1; and (d) λf = 5 mm−1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Mean pressure by using the sanded surface (original surface) and low-pass filtered surfaces with λf = 5, 10, 20 mm−1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Contact area ratio Ar (%) by using the sanded surface (original surface) and low-pass filtered surfaces with λf = 5, 10, 20 mm−1




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In