0
Research Papers: Friction & Wear

Experimental Investigation on Abrasive Wear Behavior of Functionally Graded Aluminum Composite

[+] Author and Article Information
N. Radhika

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham,
Coimbatore 641112, India
e-mail: n_radhika1@cb.amrita.edu

R. Raghu

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham,
Coimbatore 641112, India
e-mail: messiraghu.777@gmail.com

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Tribology Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TRIBOLOGY. Manuscript received September 30, 2014; final manuscript received January 27, 2015; published online April 15, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Dae-Eun Kim.

J. Tribol 137(3), 031606 (Jul 01, 2015) (7 pages) Paper No: TRIB-14-1244; doi: 10.1115/1.4029941 History: Received September 30, 2014; Revised January 27, 2015; Online April 15, 2015

Functionally graded Al–Si12Cu/10 wt.% B4Cp metal matrix composite (MMC) has been fabricated under stir casting process followed by horizontal centrifugal casting method. The casting of length 170 mm, outer diameter 160 mm, and thickness 16 mm was obtained under the centrifugal speed of 1000 rev min−1. The microstructural evaluation was carried out on the surfaces at distance of 3, 6, 9, and 11 mm from the outer periphery of the casting to ensure the distribution of reinforcement particles, and the surfaces at same distance were tested for its hardness using microhardness tester. The microstructural results revealed that surface at a distance of 3 mm from the outer periphery has reinforcement concentration of 32% and surface at a distance of 11 mm has reinforcement concentration of 3%. The hardness of the surface was improved considerably according to the reinforcement concentration. The three-body abrasive wear test was conducted on the composite specimens as per L16 orthogonal array for parameters such as the load, speed, time, and reinforcement concentration. Each parameter was varied for four levels and the optimum level of each parameter was found out through signal-to-noise ratio analysis using “smaller-the-better” characteristics. The signal-to-noise ratio analysis revealed that load was the dominant parameter on the abrasive wear behavior followed by reinforcement concentration, speed, and time. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) result indicates the parameter that affects the response significantly and results were agreed with signal-to-noise ratio analysis. The regression equation was developed and results were validated using confirmation experiments. The worn-out surfaces were examined using scanning electron microscope (SEM) for observing the wear mechanism.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Watson, I. G., Forster, M. F., Lee, P. D., Dashwood, R. J., Hamilton, R. W., and Chirazi, A., 2005, “Investigation of the Clustering Behaviour of Titanium Diboride Particles in Aluminium,” Composites, 36(9), pp. 1177–1187. [CrossRef]
Jiang Song, C., Ming Xu, Z., and Jian-Guo, L., 2007, “Fabrication of In Situ Al/Mg2Si Functionally Graded Materials by Electromagnetic Separation Method,” Composites, 38(2), pp. 427–433. [CrossRef]
Alieldin, S. S., Alshorbagy, A. E., and Shaat, M. A., 2011, “First-Order Shear Deformation Finite Element Model for Elastostatic Analysis of Laminated Composite Plates and the Equivalent Functionally Graded Plates,” Ain Shams Eng. J., 2(1), pp. 53–62. [CrossRef]
Rajan, T. P. D., Pillai, R. M., and Pai, B. C., 2008, “Processing and Characterization of Functionally Graded Aluminium Alloy and Composites by Centrifugal Casting,” World Foundry Congress, pp. 63–68.
Rajan, T. P. D., Jayakumar, E., and Pai, B. C., 2012, “Developments in Solidification Processing of Functionally Graded Aluminium Alloys and Composites by Centrifugal Casting Technique,” Trans. Indian Inst. Met., 65(6), pp. 531–537. [CrossRef]
Chirita, G., Soares, D., and Silva, F. S., 2008, “Advantages of the Centrifugal Casting Technique for the Production of Structural Components With Al–Si Alloys,” Mater. Des., 29(1), pp. 20–27. [CrossRef]
Keerthi Prasad, K. S., Murali, M. S., and Mukunda, P. G., 2010, “Analysis of Fluid Flow in Centrifugal Casting,” Front Mater. Sci. China, 4(1), pp. 103–110. [CrossRef]
Huang, X., Liu, C., Lv, X., Liu, G., and Li, F., 2011, “Aluminium Alloy Pistons Reinforced With SiC Fabricated by Centrifugal Casting,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 211(9), pp. 1540–1546. [CrossRef]
Xiandong, S., Chengping, L., Zhuoxuan, L., and Liuzhang, O., 1997, “The Fabrication and Properties of Particle Reinforced Cast Metal Matrix Composites,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 63(1–3), pp. 426–431. [CrossRef]
Das, S., 2004, “Development of Aluminium Alloy Composites for Engineering Applications,” Trans. Indian Inst. Met., 57(4), pp. 325–334.
Kumar, A., Mahapatra, M. M., and Jha, P. K., 2013, “Modeling the Abrasive Wear Characteristics of In-Situ Synthesized Al–4.5%Cu/TiC Composites,” Wear, 306(1–2), pp. 170–178. [CrossRef]
Radhika, N., Subramanian, R., and Venkat Prasat, S., 2011, “Tribological Behaviour of Aluminium/Alumina/Graphite Hybrid Metal Matrix Composite Using Taguchi's Techniques,” J. Miner. Mater. Charact., 10(5), pp. 427–443.
Humberto Melgarejo, Z., Marcelo Suarez, O., and Sridharan, K., 2006, “Wear Resistance of a Functionally-Graded Aluminium Matrix Composite,” Scr. Mater., 55(1), pp. 95–98. [CrossRef]
Reza Derakshen, M., Sina, H., and Nazemi, H., 2011, “The Comparison of Microstructure and Hardness of Al-B And Al-Mg-B Composites,” Majilesi J. Mech. Eng., 4(4), pp. 27–31.
Vieira, A. C., Sequeira, P. D., Gomes, J. R., and Rocha, L. A., 2009, “Dry Sliding Wear of Al Alloy/SiCp Functionally Graded Composites: Influence of Processing Conditions,” Wear, 267(1–4), pp. 585–592. [CrossRef]
Sahin, Y., and Ozdin, K., 2008, “A Model for the Abrasive Wear Behaviour of Aluminium Based Composites,” Mater. Des., 29(3), pp. 728–733. [CrossRef]
Ranganatha, S. R., Chittappa, H. C., and Tulsidas, D., 2013, “Investigation on Three-Body Abrasive Wear of Al2O3 Filler on CFRP Composites,” Int. J. Adv. Res. Stud., 2(3), pp. 83–85.
Das, S., Das, S., and Das, K., 2007, “Abrasive Wear of Zircon Sand and Alumina Reinforced Al–4.5 wt.% Cu Alloy Matrix Composites—A Comparative Study,” Compos. Sci. Technol., 67(3–4), pp. 746–751. [CrossRef]
Mondal, D. P., and Das, S., 2006, “High Stress Abrasive Wear Behaviour of Aluminium Hard Particle Composites: Effect of Experimental Parameters, Particle Size and Volume Fraction,” Tribol. Int., 39(6), pp. 470–478. [CrossRef]
Uvaraja, V. C., and Natarajan, N., 2012, “Optimization on Friction and Wear Process Parameters Using Taguchi Technique,” Int. J. Eng. Technol., 2(4), pp. 694–699.
Mishra, A. Kr., Sheokand, R., and Srivastava, R. K., 2012, “Tribological Behaviour of Al 6061/SiC Metal Matrix Composite by Taguchi's Techniques,” Int. J. Sci. Res. Publ., 2(10), pp. 1–8.
Pradeep, Katyal, P., and Gulati, V., 2013, “Effect of Weight Percentage of SiC on Coefficient of Friction and Wear Behaviour of Al(6351)–SiC Metal Matrix Composite,” Int. J. Res. Aeronaut. Mech. Eng., 1(6), pp. 23–41.
Izciler, M., and Muratoglu, M., 2003, “Wear Behaviour of SiC Reinforced 2124 Al Alloy Composite in RWAT System,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 132(1–3), pp. 67–72. [CrossRef]
Kok, M., and Ozdin, K., 2007, “Wear Resistance of Aluminium Alloy and Its Composites Reinforced By Al2O3 Particles,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 183(2), pp. 301–309. [CrossRef]
Canakci, A., and Arslan, F., 2012, “Abrasive Wear Behaviour of B4C Particle Reinforced Al 2024 MMCs,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 63(5–8), pp. 785–795. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Electric resistance furnace with stirrer setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Centrifugal casting machine

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Microstructure of the FGAMMC at varying distances: (a) 3 mm, (b) 6 mm, (c) 9 mm, and (d) 11 mm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Reinforcement concentration variation with distance from outer periphery

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Hardness of FGAMMC at different distances

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

(a) Dry abrasion tester-TR50 and (b) specimen-before and after abrasion

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Main effect plots for means—wear-rate

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Main effect plots for S/N ratio—wear-rate

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

SEM analysis of FGAMMC: (a) L = 28 N and R = 3%; (b) L = 52 N and R = 3%; (c) L = 64 N and R = 3%; and (d) L = 64 N and R = 32%

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In