0
Research Papers: Applications

Simulation of the Cold Spray Particle Deposition Process

[+] Author and Article Information
Jing Xie, Hélène Walter-Le Berre

Université de Lyon,
INSA-Lyon,
LaMCoS UMR CNRS 5259,
Villeurbanne F69621, France

Daniel Nélias

Université de Lyon,
INSA-Lyon,
Bât. Joseph Jacquard. 27,
Av. A. Einstein,
LaMCoS UMR CNRS 5259,
Villeurbanne F69621, France
e-mail: daniel.nelias@insa-lyon.fr

Kazuhiro Ogawa, Yuji Ichikawa

Fracture and Reliability Research Institute,
Tohoku University,
Sendai, Miyagi 980, Japan

Contributed by the Tribology Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TRIBOLOGY. Manuscript received October 17, 2012; final manuscript received March 27, 2015; published online May 11, 2015. Assoc. Editor: James R. Barber.

J. Tribol 137(4), 041101 (Oct 01, 2015) (15 pages) Paper No: TRIB-12-1182; doi: 10.1115/1.4030257 History: Received October 17, 2012; Revised March 27, 2015; Online May 11, 2015

Cold spray is a rapidly developing coating technology for depositing materials in the solid state. In this work, the cold spray particle deposition process was simulated by modeling high-velocity impacts of spherical particles onto a flat substrate under various conditions. For the first time, we proposed the coupled Eulerian–Lagrangian (CEL) numerical approach as a means of solving the high-strain rate deformation problem. Using this approach, we observed a compressive stress region at the interface between the particles and the substrate induced by large plastic strains in the materials. Due to the high contact pressure (about 1 GPa) and the short contact time (about 40 ns), the high-strain rate (106s-1) plastic deformation region was only a few micrometers deep and was localized mainly at the bottom of the particle and substrate surface. The ability of the CEL method to model the cold spray deposition process was assessed through a systematic parametric study including impact velocity, initial particle temperature, friction coefficient, and materials combination. The higher the impact velocity, the higher the initial kinetic energy, leading to more substantial plastic deformations and significant temperature increases in the substrate. The initial particle temperature has a greater influence on the equivalent plastic strain than on the temperature increase in the substrate. Friction has a limited effect on the temperature distribution and increase in the substrate, and the equivalent plastic strain increases only slightly as the friction coefficient rises. Four combinations of particle/substrate materials (Cu/Cu, Al/Al, Cu/Al, and Al/Cu) were considered in our study. Obviously, the particle's material had a greater influence on the deposition process and on the deformation than the substrate material. Concerning the particle's material, a higher-density material, such as Cu, has a higher initial kinetic energy, which has the advantage of increasing the contact area and contact time, resulting in better bonding between particles and substrate. Compared to other numerical methods (Lagrangian, arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian (ALE), and smooth particle hydrodynamics (SPH)), the CEL approach is globally more accurate and more robust in high-strain rate deformation regimes.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Chaise, T., Nélias, D., and Sadeghi, F., 2011, “On the Effect of Isotropic Hardening on the Coefficient of Restitution for Single or Repeated Impacts Using a Semi-Analytical Method,” Tribol. Trans., 54(5), pp. 714–722. [CrossRef]
Chaise, T., Li, J., Nélias, D., Kubler, R., Taheri, S., Douchet, G., Robin, V., and Gilles, P., 2012, “Modelling of Multiple Impacts for the Prediction of Distortions and Residual Stresses Induced by Ultrasonic Shot Peening (USP),” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 212(10), pp. 2080–2090. [CrossRef]
Grujicic, M., Zhao, C., DeRosset, W., and Helfritch, D., 2004, “Adiabatic Shear Instability Based Mechanism for Particles/Substrate Bonding in the Cold-Gas Dynamic-Spray Process,” Mater. Des., 25(8), pp. 681–688. [CrossRef]
Li, W., Zhang, C., Li, C., and Liao, H., 2009, “Modeling Aspects of High Velocity Impact of Particles in Cold Spraying by Explicit Finite Element Analysis,” J. Therm. Spray Technol., 18(5–6), pp. 921–933. [CrossRef]
Li, W., and Gao, W., 2009, “Some Aspects on 3D Numerical Modeling of High Velocity Impact of Particles in Cold Spraying by Explicit Finite Element Analysis,” Appl. Surf. Sci., 255(18), pp. 7878–7892. [CrossRef]
Assadi, H., Gärtner, F., Stoltenhoff, T., and Kreye, H., 2003, “Bonding Mechanism in Cold Gas Spraying,” Acta Mater., 51(15), pp. 4379–4394. [CrossRef]
Yildirim, B., Muftu, S., and Gouldstone, A., 2011, “Modeling of High Velocity Impact of Spherical Particles,” Wear, 270(9–10), pp. 703–713. [CrossRef]
Bae, G., Xiong, Y., Kumar, S., Kang, K., and Lee, C., 2008, “General Aspects of Interface Bonding in Kinetic Sprayed Coatings,” Acta Mater., 56(17), pp. 4858–4868. [CrossRef]
Kumar, S., Bae, G., and Lee, C., 2009, “Deposition Characteristics of Copper Particles on Roughened Substrates Through Kinetic Spraying,” Appl. Surf. Sci., 255(6), pp. 3472–3479. [CrossRef]
Li, W., Liao, H., Li, C., Bang, H.-S., and Coddet, C., 2007, “Numerical Simulation of Deformation Behavior of Al Particles Impacting on Al Substrate and Effect of Surface Oxide Films on Interfacial Bonding in Cold Spraying,” Appl. Surf. Sci., 253(11), pp. 5084–5091. [CrossRef]
Yin, S., Wang, X., Li, W., and Xu, B., 2009, “Numerical Investigation on Effects of Interactions Between Particles on Coating Formation in Cold Spraying,” J. Therm. Spray Technol., 18(4), pp. 686–693. [CrossRef]
Yin, S., Wang, X., Xu, B., and Li, W., 2010, “Examination on the Calculation Method for Modeling the Multi-Particle Impact Process in Cold Spraying,” J. Therm. Spray Technol., 19(5), pp. 1032–1041. [CrossRef]
Yin, S., Wang, X., Li, W., and Jie, H., 2011, “Effect of Substrate Hardness on the Deformation Behavior of Subsequently Incident Particles in Cold Spraying,” Appl. Surf. Sci., 257(17), pp. 7560–7565. [CrossRef]
Li, W., Liao, H., Li, C., Li, G., Coddet, C., and Wang, X., 2006, “On High Velocity Impact of Micro-Sized Metallic Particles in Cold Spraying,” Appl. Surf. Sci., 253(5), pp. 2852–2862. [CrossRef]
Grujicic, M., Pandurangan, B., Bell, W., Daqaq, M., Ma, L., Seyr, N., Erdmann, M., and Holzleitner, J., 2008, “A Computational Analysis and Suitability Assessment of Cold-Gas Dynamic Spraying of Glass-Fiber-Reinforced Poly-Amide 6 for Use in Direct-Adhesion Polymer Metal Hybrid Components,” Appl. Surf. Sci., 254(7), pp. 2136–2145. [CrossRef]
Ogawa, K., Ito, K., Ichimura, K., Ichikawa, Y., Ohno, S., and Onda, N., 2008, “Characterization of Low-Pressure Cold-Sprayed Aluminum Coatings,” J. Therm. Spray Technol., 17(5), pp. 728–735. [CrossRef]
Takana, H., Ogawa, K., Shoji, T., and Nishiyama, H., 2008, “Computational Simulation of Cold Spray Process Assisted by Electrostatic Force,” Powder Technol., 185(2), pp. 116–123. [CrossRef]
Guetta, S., Berger, M., Borit, F., Guipont, V., Jeandin, M., Boustie, M., Ichikawa, Y., Sakaguchi, K., and Ogawa, K., 2009, “Influence of Particle Velocity on Adhesion of Cold-Sprayed Splats,” J. Therm. Spray Technol., 18(3), pp. 331–342. [CrossRef]
Ichikawa, Y., Barradas, S., Sakaguchi, K., Jeandin, M., Boustie, M., Ogawa, K., and Shoji, T., 2007, “Deposition Mechanisms of Cold Gas Dynamic Sprayed Mcraly Coatings,” International Thermal Spray Conference and Exposition, pp. 54–59.
Champagne, V. J., Helfritch, D., Leyman, P., Grendahl, S., and Klotz, B., 2005, “Interface Material Mixing Formed by the Deposition of Copper on Aluminum by Means of the Cold Spray Process,” J. Therm. Spray Technol., 14(3), pp. 330–334. [CrossRef]
Qiu, G., Henke, S., and Grabe, J., 2011, “Application of a Coupled Eulerian–Lagrangian Approach on Geomechanical Problems Involving Large Deformations,” Comput. Geotech., 38(1), pp. 30–39. [CrossRef]
Li, W., Yin, S., and Wang, X., 2010, “Numerical Investigations of the Effect of Oblique Impact on Particle Deformation in Cold Spraying by the SPH Method,” Appl. Surf. Sci., 256(12), pp. 3725–3734. [CrossRef]
Manap, A., Ogawa, K., and Okabe, T., 2012, “Numerical Analysis of Interfacial Bonding of Al-Si Particle and Mild Steel Substrate by Cold Spray Technique Using the SPH Method,” J. Solid Mech. Mater. Eng., 6(3), pp. 241–250. [CrossRef]
Manap, A., Okabe, T., and Ogawa, K., 2011, “Computer Simulation of Cold Sprayed Deposition Using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics,” Procedia Eng., 10(4), pp. 1145–1150. [CrossRef]
Smojver, I., and Ivančević, D., 2011, “Bird Strike Damage Analysis in Aircraft Structures Using Abaqus/Explicit and Coupled Eulerian Lagrangian Approach,” Compos. Sci. Technol., 71(4), pp. 489–498. [CrossRef]
Dassault Systemes, 2011, abaqus Analysis User's Manue, 6.11 ed., Simulia, Providence, Chap. 24.
Manap, A., 2011, “Mechanical Analysis of Interfacial Bonding of Cold Sprayed Metallic Particles Using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Method,” Ph.D. thesis, Tohoku University, Sendai.
King, P. C., Bae, G., Zahiri, S. H., Jahedi, M., and Lee, C., 2010, “An Experimental and Finite Element Study of Cold Spray Copper Impact Onto Two Aluminum Substrates,” J. Therm. Spray Technol., 19(3), pp. 620–634. [CrossRef]
King, P., Zahiri, S., and Jahedi, M., 2008, “Focused Ion Beam Micro-Dissection of Cold-Sprayed Particles,” Acta Mater., 56(19), pp. 5617–5626. [CrossRef]
Manap, A., Ogawa, K., and Okabe, T., 2011, “Numerical Analysis of Interfacial Bonding of Aluminum Powder Particle and Aluminum Substrate by Cold Spray Technique Using the SPH Method,” JSME/ASME 2011 ICMP2011.
Johnson, G. R., and Cook, W. H., 1983, “A Constitutive Model and Data for Metals Subjected to Large Strains, High Strain Rates and High Temperatures,” The 7th International Symposium on Ballistics, pp. 541–547.
Swegle, J., Attaway, S., Heinstein, M., Mello, F., and Hicks, D., 1994, An Analysis of Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics, Sandia National Laboratories, Report No. SAND93-2513.
Suhonen, T., Varis, T., Dosta, S., Torrell, M., and Guilemany, J., 2013, “Residual Stress Development in Cold Sprayed Al, Cu and Ti Coatings,” Acta Mater., 61(17), pp. 6329–6337. [CrossRef]
Li, W., Li, C., and Yang, G., 2010, “Effect of Impact-Induced Melting on Interface Microstructure and Bonding of Cold Sprayed Zinc Coating,” Appl. Surf. Sci., 257(5), pp. 1516–1523. [CrossRef]
Grujicic, M., Saylor, J., Beasley, D., DeRosset, W., and Helfritch, D., 2003, “Computational Analysis of the Interfacial Bonding Between Feed-Powder Particles and the Substrate in the Cold-Gas Dynamic-Spray Process,” Appl. Surf. Sci., 219(3–4), pp. 211–227. [CrossRef]
Lee, H. Y., Yu, Y. H., Lee, Y. C., Hong, Y. P., and Ko, K. H., 2004, “Interfacial Studies Between Cold Sprayed WO3 Y2O3 Films and Si Substrate,” Appl. Surf. Sci., 227(1–4), pp. 244–249. [CrossRef]
Lee, J., Shin, S., Kim, H., and Lee, C., 2007, “Effect of Gas Temperature on Critical Velocity and Deposition Characteristics in Kinetic Spraying,” Appl. Surf. Sci., 253(7), pp. 3512–3520. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic representations of (a) the 2D axisymmetric model, (b) the 3D SPH model, and (c) the 3D CEL model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Contours of (a) the equivalent plastic strain and (b) the temperature for Al/Al impact simulation at 700 m/s using the Lagrangian method, aborted at 19 ns

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Time history of (a) the equivalent plastic strain (PEEQ) and (b) the temperature for Al/Al impact simulation at 700 m/s using the Lagrangian method

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Contours of (a) the equivalent plastic strain and (b) the temperature for Al/Al impact simulation at 700 m/s using the ALE method

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Time history of (a) the equivalent plastic strain (PEEQ) and (b) the temperature for Al/Al impact simulation at 700 m/s using the ALE approach

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Contours of the equivalent plastic strain for Al/Al impact simulation at 700 m/s using the SPH method

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Time history of (a) the equivalent plastic strain (PEEQ) and (b) the stress in the substrate for Al/Al impact simulation at 700 m/s using the SPH approach

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Contours of (a) the volume average of the equivalent plastic strain in the Al particle and (b) the equivalent plastic strain in the Al substrate at 700 m/s using the CEL method

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Contours of (a) the volume average of the temperature in the Al particle and (b) the temperature of the Al substrate at 700 m/s using the CEL method

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Time history of (a) the equivalent plastic strain (PEEQ) and (b) the temperature for Al/Al impact simulation at 700 mm/s using the CEL approach

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Time history of (a) the normalized kinetic energies and (b) the normalized displacements of the substrate's center at 700 m/s using the four approaches

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Time histories of (a) the stable time increment and (b) the artificial strain energy at 700 m/s using the four approaches

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Evolution of the mean stress in a 500 m/s Al/Al impact: (a) 5 ns, (b) 10 ns, (c) 20 ns, (d) 30 ns, (e) 40 ns, and (f) 60 ns

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Evolution of the equivalent plastic strain (PEEQ) in a 500 m/s Al/Al impact: (a) 5 ns, (b) 10 ns, (c) 20 ns, (d) 30 ns, (e) 40 ns, and (f) 60 ns

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Strain rate distribution over the contact surface in (a) the Al particle and (b) the Al substrate in a 500 m/s impact

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Distribution of (a) the contact pressure (CPRESS) and (b) the frictional shear stress (CSHEAR) in a 500 m/s Al/Al impact

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Distribution of the temperature (TEMP) along the contact surface of (a) the particle and (b) the substrate in a 500 m/s Al/Al impact

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Distribution of (a) the contact force (CFORCE) and (b) the normalized displacement of the Al substrate impacted by the Al particle at 500 m/s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Time history of (a) the equivalent plastic strain (PEEQ) and (b) the temperature (TEMP) for Al/Al impact simulation at 700 m/s, 780 m/s, and 840 m/s using the CEL approach

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Distribution of (a) the equivalent plastic strain (PEEQ) and (b) the temperature (TEMP) at the surface of the Al substrate at 700 m/s, 780 m/s, and 840 m/s using the CEL approach

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

Time history of (a) the equivalent plastic strain (PEEQ) and (b) the temperature (TEMP) for Cu/Al impact with 473 K, 673 K, and 873 K initial particle temperature using the CEL approach

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 22

Distribution of (a) the equivalent plastic strain (PEEQ) and (b) the temperature (TEMP) at the surface of the Al substrate with 473 K, 673 K, and 873 K initial particle temperature using the CEL approach

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 23

Time history of (a) the equivalent plastic strain (PEEQ) and (b) the temperature (TEMP) in a Cu/Cu impact with 0.2, 0.3, and 0.5 friction coefficient using the CEL approach

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 24

Time history of the ratio of the friction energy (ALLFD) to the internal energy (ALLIE) in a Cu/Cu impact with 0.2, 0.3, and 0.5 friction coefficient using the CEL approach

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 25

Distribution of (a) the equivalent plastic strain (PEEQ) and (b) the temperature (TEMP) at the Cu substrate's surface with 0.2, 0.3, and 0.5 friction coefficient using the CEL approach

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 26

Time history of (a) the equivalent plastic strain (PEEQ) and (b) the temperature (TEMP) for Al/Al, Cu/Cu, Al/Cu, and Cu/Al impact at 500 m/s using the CEL approach

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 27

Distribution of (a) the equivalent plastic strain (PEEQ) and (b) the temperature (TEMP) of the substrate's surface for various materials combinations using the CEL approach

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In