Technical Brief

Analysis of Spherical Contact Models for Differential Hardness as a Function of Poisson's Ratio

[+] Author and Article Information
Giuseppe Pintaude

Department of Mechanics (DAMEC),
Federal University of Technology - Paraná (UTFPR),
Avenida Sete de Setembro,
3165, Curitiba,
Paraná 80230-901, Brazil
e-mail: giuseppepintaude@gmail.com

Contributed by the Tribology Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TRIBOLOGY. Manuscript received December 1, 2014; final manuscript received May 28, 2015; published online July 7, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Robert L. Jackson.

J. Tribol 137(4), 044502 (Oct 01, 2015) (3 pages) Paper No: TRIB-14-1293; doi: 10.1115/1.4030770 History: Received December 01, 2014; Revised May 28, 2015; Online July 07, 2015

A differential hardness is needed for a spherical indenter to avoid large deformations of it during an indentation process. Tabor proposes a criterion for this, where the ball hardness should be at least 2.5 times harder than the specimen. Later, five models expand the Tabor proposal, such that the critical interference corresponding to the inception of plastic deformation depends on the Poisson's ratio. This paper discusses the difference among these models, showing that they can be divided in two groups only. In addition, their similarity depending on the specific mechanical properties of tested material was used to make the conversion between yield stress and hardness.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Tabor, D., 1950, The Hardness of Metals, Oxford, London.
Robbe-Valloire, F., Paffoni, B., and Progri, R., 2001, “Load Transmission by Elastic, Elasto-Plastic or Fully Plastic Deformation of Rough Interface Asperities,” Mech. Mater., 33(11), pp. 617–633. [CrossRef]
Park, Y. J., and Pharr, G. M., 2004, “Nanoindentation With Spherical Indenters: Finite Element Studies of Deformation in the Elastic–Plastic Transition Regime,” Thin Solid Films, 447/448, pp. 246–250. [CrossRef]
Song, Z., and Komvopoulos, K., 2013, “Elastic–Plastic Spherical Indentation: Deformation Regimes, Evolution of Plasticity, and Hardening Effect,” Mech. Mater., 61, pp. 91–100. [CrossRef]
ASTM E10-12, 2012, Standard Test Method for Brinell Hardness of Metallic Materials, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
Chang, W. R., Etsion, I., and Bogy, D. B., 1987, “An Elastic-Plastic Model for the Contact of Rough Surfaces,” ASME J. Tribol., 109(2), pp. 257–263. [CrossRef]
Lin, L. P., and Lin, J. F., 2005, “An Elastoplastic Microasperity Contact Model for Metallic Materials,” ASME J. Tribol., 127(3), pp. 666–672. [CrossRef]
Jackson, R. L., and Green, I., 2005, “A Finite Element Study of Elasto-Plastic Hemispherical Contact Against a Rigid Flat,” ASME J. Tribol., 127(2), pp. 343–354. [CrossRef]
Green, I., 2005, “Poisson Ratio Effects and Critical Values in Spherical and Cylindrical Hertzian Contacts,” Int. J. Appl. Mech. Eng., 10(3), pp. 451–462. http://itzhak.green.gatech.edu/rotordynamics/Poisson_ratio_and_critical_values.pdf
Brizmer, V., Kligerman, Y., and Etsion, I., 2006, “The Effect of Contact Conditions and Material Properties on the Elasticity Terminus of a Spherical Contact,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 43(18–19), pp. 5736–5749. [CrossRef]
Jackson, R. L., Krithivasan, V., and Wilson, W. E., 2008, “The Pressure to Cause Complete Contact Between Elastic Plastic Sinusoidal Surfaces,” IMechE J. Eng. Trib., 222(7), pp. 857–863. [CrossRef]
Kogut, L., and Komvopoulos, K., 2004, “Analysis of the Spherical Indentation Cycle for Elastic–Perfectly Plastic Solids,” J. Mater. Res., 19(12), pp. 3641–3653. [CrossRef]
Yu, W., and Blanchard, J. P., 1996, “An Elastic-Plastic Indentation Model and Its Solutions,” J. Mater. Res., 11(9), pp. 2358–2367. [CrossRef]
Vandeperre, L. J., Giuliani, F., and Clegg, W. J., 2004, “Effect of Elastic Surface Deformation on the Relation Between Hardness and Yield Strength,” J. Mater. Res., 19(12), pp. 3704–3714. [CrossRef]
Megalingam, A., and Mayuram, M. M., 2014, “A Comprehensive Elastic-Plastic Single-Asperity Contact Model,” Tribol. Trans., 57(2), pp. 324–335. [CrossRef]
Wadwalkar, S. S., Jackson, R. L., and Kogut, L., 2010, “A Study of the Elastic Plastic Deformation of Heavily Deformed Spherical Contacts,” IMechE Part J, 224(10), pp. 1091–1102. [CrossRef]
Matsumoto, H., Watanabe, S., and Hanada, S., 2007, “α′ Martensite Ti–V–Sn Alloys With Low Young's Modulus and High Strength,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 448(1–2), pp. 39–48. [CrossRef]
Eriten, M., Petlicki, D. T., Polycarpou, A. A., and Bergman, L. A., 2012, “Influence of Friction and Adhesion on the Onset of Plasticity During Normal Loading of Spherical Contacts,” Mech. Mater., 48, pp. 26–42. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Variation of mean pressure over hardness at yield inception as a function of Poisson's ratio following CEB [6] and Lin and Lin [7] models

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Variation of mean pressure over hardness at yield inception as a function of Poisson's ratio following JG [8], Green [9], and BKE [10] models

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Difference (%) between CBE [6] and BKE [10] models with respect to the pm/H values as a function of Poisson's ratio for different values of E/Y ratio, using Eq. (7) to calculate the constraint factor




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In