Research Papers: Friction and Wear

Wear and Failure Mechanism of PTFE/SiO2/Epoxy Composites

[+] Author and Article Information
J. T. Shen

Department of Applied Physics,
Materials Innovation Institute M2i,
Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials,
University of Groningen,
Nijenborgh 4,
Groningen 9747 AG, The Netherlands
e-mails: j.shen@rug.nl; j.t.m.de.hosson@rug.nl

Y. T. Pei

Department of Advanced Production Engineering,
Engineering and Technology Institute Groningen,
University of Groningen,
Nijenborgh 4,
Groningen 9747 AG, The Netherlands

J. Th. M. De Hosson

Department of Applied Physics,
Materials Innovation Institute M2i,
Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials,
University of Groningen,
Nijenborgh 4,
Groningen 9747 AG, The Netherlands

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Tribology Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TRIBOLOGY. Manuscript received September 28, 2015; final manuscript received December 24, 2015; published online May 6, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Satish V. Kailas.

J. Tribol 138(3), 031606 (May 06, 2016) (6 pages) Paper No: TRIB-15-1345; doi: 10.1115/1.4032527 History: Received September 28, 2015; Revised December 24, 2015

In this work, the wear and failure mechanism of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)/SiO2/epoxy composites with a high concentration of SiO2 particles under dry sliding is examined. In the composite with 12.5 wt.% PTFE, a significant rise of the coefficient of friction (COF) appears after sliding over several kilometers and under a load of 60 N against balls made out of Al2O3 and steel. It is attributed to an accumulation of back-transferred Al2O3/steel and fractured SiO2 on the worn composite surfaces as well as a reduction of PTFE on worn SiO2 surfaces. The TiC/a-C:H coated ball yields the most stable COF. It is also observed that the loading capacity of the composite decreases with increasing PTFE concentration. Massive wear of the composites is seen after few kilometers sliding when the normal load rises above the loading capacity. The increased wear is due to a high concentration of PTFE which lowers the hardness as well as the compressive strength of the composites.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Makinson, K. R. , and Tabor, D. , 1964, “ The Friction and Transfer of Polytetrafluoroethylene,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 281(1384), pp. 49–61. [CrossRef]
Bijwe, J. , Sen, S. , and Ghosh, A. , 2005, “ Influence of PTFE Content in PEEK–PTFE Blends on Mechanical Properties and Tribo-Performance in Various Wear Modes,” Wear, 258(10), pp. 1536–1542. [CrossRef]
Franke, R. , Lehmann, D. , and Kunze, K. , 2007, “ Tribological Behaviour of New Chemically Bonded PTFE Polyamide Compounds,” Wear, 262(3–4), pp. 242–252. [CrossRef]
Ye, S. , and Zeng, X. , 2014, “ Tribological Properties of PTFE and PTFE Composites at Different Temperatures,” Tribol. Trans., 57(3), pp. 382–386. [CrossRef]
Mu, L. , Feng, X. , Zhu, J. , Wang, H. , Sun, Q. , Shi, Y. , and Lu, X. , 2010, “ Comparative Study of Tribological Properties of Different Fibers Reinforced PTFE/PEEK Composites at Elevated Temperatures,” Tribol. Trans., 53(2), pp. 189–194. [CrossRef]
Chen, B. , Wang, J. , Liu, N. , and Yan, F. , 2013, “ Synergetic Effect of Lubricant Additive and Reinforcement Additive on the Tribological Behaviors of PEEK-Based Composites Under Sea Water Lubrication,” Tribol. Trans., 56(4), pp. 672–680. [CrossRef]
Shen, J. T. , Top, M. , Pei, Y. T. , and De Hosson, J. Th. M. , 2015, “ Wear and Friction Performance of PTFE Filled Epoxy Composites With a High Concentration of SiO2 Particles,” Wear, 322–323(1), pp. 171–180. [CrossRef]
Hornbogen, E. , 1975, “ The Role of Fracture Toughness in the Wear of Metals,” Wear, 33(2), pp. 251–259. [CrossRef]
Friedrich, K. , Lu, Z. , and Häger, A. M. , 1993, “ Overview on Polymer Composites for Friction and Wear Application,” Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech., 19(1), pp. 1–11. [CrossRef]
Sawyer, W. , Freudenberg, K. , Bhimaraj, P. , and Schadler, L. , 2003, “ A Study on the Friction and Wear Behavior of PTFE Filled With Alumina Nanoparticles,” Wear, 254(5–6), pp. 573–580. [CrossRef]
Fu, S. Y. , Feng, X. Q. , Lauke, B. , and Mai, Y. W. , 2008, “ Effects of Particle Size, Particle/Matrix Interface Adhesion and Particle Loading on Mechanical Properties of Particulate–Polymer Composites,” Composites, Part B, 39(6), pp. 933–961. [CrossRef]
Shen, J. T. , Pei, Y. T. , and De Hosson, J. Th. M. , 2013, “ Tribological Behavior of TiC/a-C:H-Coated and Uncoated Steels Sliding Against Phenol–Formaldehyde Composite Reinforced With PTFE and Glass Fibers,” Tribol. Lett., 52(1), pp. 123–135. [CrossRef]
Pei, Y. T. , Galvan, D. , and De Hosson, J. Th. M. , 2005, “ Nanostructure and Properties of TiC/a-C:H Composite Coatings,” Acta Mater., 53(17), pp. 4505–4521. [CrossRef]
Khruschov, M. M. , 1974, “ Principles of Abrasive Wear,” Wear, 28(1), pp. 69–88. [CrossRef]
Leyland, A. , and Matthews, A. , 2000, “ On the Significance of the H/E Ratio in Wear Control: A Nanocomposite Coating Approach to Optimised Tribological Behaviour,” Wear, 246(1–2), pp. 1–11. [CrossRef]
Yousif, B. F. , and El-Tayeb, N. S. M. , 2010, “ Wear Characteristics of Thermoset Composite Under High Stress Three-Body Abrasive,” Tribol. Int., 43(12), pp. 2365–2371. [CrossRef]
Sharma, S. , Anand, B. , and Krishna, M. , 2000, “ Evaluation of Sliding Wear Behaviour of Feldspar Particle-Reinforced Magnesium Alloy Composites,” Wear, 241(1), pp. 33–40. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

COFs curves of the Epomet-PTFE-12.5 sliding against the Al2O3 ball, under 60 N normal load and at 20 mm/s speed. After the COF increases to 0.115, a fresh and clean composite surface is introduced to slide against the worn Al2O3 ball (old scar curve). The previously worn composite surface is used to slide against a fresh and clean Al2O3 ball surface (old track curve). Another test curve indicates another nonstop test.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Wear rates of different counterpart balls after sliding against the Epomet-PTFE-12.5 for various distances indicated, under 60 N normal load and at 20 mm/s speed

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Light micrographs of ((a) and (c)) the worn Epomet-PTFE-12.5 surface and ((b) and (d)) the worn Al2O3 surface after sliding for ((a) and (b)) 3000 m, COF = 0.10, and ((c) and (d)) 4800 m, COF = 0.27, under 60 N normal load and at 20 mm/s speed. The arrows refer to the moving direction of the counterparts.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

COF curves of the Epomet-PTFE-12.5 sliding against the ø13 mm 100Cr6 steel ball, ø13 mm Al2O3 ball, and ø13 mm TiC/a-C:H coated ball, under 60 N normal load and at a speed of 20 mm/s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

EDS quantitative results showing the evolution of various elements with sliding distance, when the Epomet-PTFE-12.5 sliding the Al2O3 ball, under 60 N normal load and at 20 mm/s speed. (a) The average at. % of elements on the whole worn composite surfaces and (b) the average at. % of elements on the worn SiO2 surfaces only. The corresponding COF curves are plotted as well in both graphs.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

(a) Measured Vickers hardness versus the PTFE content of the Epomet-PTFE composites. (b) Measured compressive strength (ultimate strength) of the Epomet-PTFE composites, and the apparent contact pressure (using the area of ball wear scar, MPa) of the Epomet-PTFE composites sliding against Al2O3 ball for 100 m, under various normal load and at 20 mm/s sliding speed. Dots that are above the line indicate evident large fatigue (pitting) wear occurring, while dots that are below the line indicate no sign of fatigue (pitting) wear.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

COF curves of the Epomet-PTFE composites with various PTFE concentrations sliding against the Al2O3 ball, under various normal load and at 20 mm/s speed

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

An illustration of the method to calculate wear volume via matlab




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In