0
Research Papers: Friction and Wear

On the Prediction of Transient Wear

[+] Author and Article Information
Vahid Mortazavi

Department of Mechanical
and Industrial Engineering,
Louisiana State University,
Baton Rouge, LA 70803

M. M. Khonsari

Department of Mechanical
and Industrial Engineering,
Louisiana State University,
Baton Rouge, LA 70803
e-mail: Khonsari@me.lsu.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Tribology Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TRIBOLOGY. Manuscript received June 29, 2015; final manuscript received February 12, 2016; published online July 14, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Sinan Muftu.

J. Tribol 138(4), 041604 (Jul 14, 2016) (8 pages) Paper No: TRIB-15-1228; doi: 10.1115/1.4032843 History: Received June 29, 2015; Revised February 12, 2016

During the running-in process, a friction pair experiences drastic evolution in many of its tribological parameters, such as surface roughness, wear rate, and coefficient of friction until steady-state is attained. In this paper, we present a model for predicting the behavior of the running-in process. Specifically, we determine a general relationship between the wear loss and surface roughness during the running-in stage and test the validity of its prediction of wear rate by comparing to available experimental results. We show, by using a dimensional analysis and applying the Buckingham Pi theorem, that there exists a linear relationship between the transient dimensionless wear, the dimensionless initial surface roughness, and dimensionless running-in time.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Blau, P. J. , 2006, “ On the Nature of Running-In,” Tribol. Int., 38(11), pp. 1007–1012.
Archard, J. F. , 1952, “ Contact and Rubbing of Flat Surfaces,” J. Appl. Phys., 23, pp. 981–988.
Queener, C. A. , Smith, T. C. , and Mitchell, W. L. , 1965, “ Transient Wear of Machine Parts,” Wear, 8(5), pp. 391–400. [CrossRef]
Levy, V. , and Jee, N. , 1988, “ Unlubricated Sliding Wear of Ceramic Materials,” Wear, 121(3), pp. 363–380. [CrossRef]
Wang, W. , and Scholz, C. H. , 1994, “ Wear Processes During Frictional Sliding of Rock: A Theoretical and Experimental Study,” J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth, 99(B4), pp. 6789–6799. [CrossRef]
Blau, P. J. , 1987, “ A Model for Run-In and Other Transitions in Sliding Friction,” ASME J. Tribol., 109(3), pp. 537–544. [CrossRef]
Hu, Y. Z. , Li, N. , and Tonder, K. , 1991, “ A Dynamic System Model for Lubricated Sliding Wear and Running-In,” ASME J. Tribol., 113(3), pp. 499–505. [CrossRef]
Wang, W. , and Wong, P. L. , 2000, “ Wear Volume Determination During Running-In for PEHL Contacts,” Tribol. Int., 33(7), pp. 501–506. [CrossRef]
Kumar, R. , Prakash, B. , and Sethuramiah, A. , 2002, “ A Systematic Methodology to Characterize the Running-In and Steady-State Wear Processes,” Wear, 252(5–6), pp. 445–453. [CrossRef]
Akbarzadeh, S. , and Khonsari, M. M. , 2010, “ On the Prediction of Running-In Behavior in Mixed-Lubrication Line Contact,” ASME J. Tribol., 132(3), p. 032102. [CrossRef]
Ghosh, A. , and Sadeghi, F. , 2015, “ A Novel Approach to Model Effects of Surface Roughness Parameters on Wear,” Wear, 338, pp. 73–94. [CrossRef]
Drucker, D. C. , 1976, “ Elementary Results of Dimensional Analysis for Friction and Wear in Steady-State Sliding,” Wear, 40(1), pp. 129–133. [CrossRef]
Shaw, M. C. , 1977, “ Dimensional Analysis for Wear Systems,” Wear, 43(2), pp. 263–266. [CrossRef]
Amiri, M. , Khonsari, M. M. , and Brahmeshwarkar, S. , 2012, “ An Application of Dimensional Analysis to Entropy–Wear Relationship,” ASME J. Tribol., 134(1), p. 011604. [CrossRef]
Buckingham, E. , 1914, “ On Physically Similar Systems; Illustrations of the Use of Dimensional Equations,” Phys. Rev., 4(4), pp. 345–376. [CrossRef]
Aghdam, A. B. , and Khonsari, M. M. , 2011, “ On the Correlation Between Wear and Entropy in Dry Sliding Contact,” Wear, 270(11), pp. 781–790. [CrossRef]
Aghdam, A. B. , and Khonsari, M. M. , “ Application of a Thermodynamically Based Wear Estimation Methodology,” ASME J. Tribol. (accepted).
Zhao, Y. , Maietta, D. M. , and Chang, L. , 2000, “ An Asperity Microcontact Model Incorporating the Transition From Elastic Deformation to Fully Plastic Flow,” ASME J. Tribol., 122(1), pp. 86–93. [CrossRef]
Patir, N. , 1978, “ A Numerical Procedure for Random Generation of Rough Surfaces,” Wear, 47(2), pp. 263–277. [CrossRef]
Akbarzadeh, S. , and Khonsari, M. M. , 2010, “ Effect of Surface Pattern on Stribeck Curve,” Tribol. Lett., 37(2), pp. 477–486. [CrossRef]
Pawar, G. , Pawlus, P. , Etsion, I. , and Raeymaekers, B. , 2013, “ The Effect of Determining Topography Parameters on Analyzing Elastic Contact Between Isotropic Rough Surfaces,” ASME J. Tribol., 135(1), p. 011401. [CrossRef]
Greenwood, J. A. , and Williamson, J. B. P. , 1966, “ Contact of Nominally Flat Surfaces,” Proc. R. Soc. London A, 295(1442), pp. 300–319. [CrossRef]
Rabinowicz, E. , 1995, Friction and Wear of Materials, Wiley, New York.
Mehdizadeh, M. , Akbarzadeh, S. , Shams, K. , and Khonsari, M. M. , 2015, “ Experimental Investigation on the Effect of Operating Conditions on the Running-In Behavior of Lubricated Elliptical Contacts,” Tribol. Lett., 59(1), pp. 1–13. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

A schematic of plastic contact of asperities

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

A schematic for contact of rough surface with a rigid smooth flat surface

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Wear curves for parameters described in Table 3. Scattered data from experiments done by Queener et al. [3].

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Transient wear coefficient for simulations by parameters described in Table 3

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Effect of initial Ra on wear loss for different combinations of load and hardness. The simulations are shown for two different values of ϕ.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Relation of nondimensional transient wear loss and nondimensional initial roughness during running-in for different H/E

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Relation of nondimensional wear loss and nondimensional time during running-in for different nondimensional initial roughness values and for constant value of H/E

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In