0
Research Papers: Hydrodynamic Lubrication

Design of Hybrid Hydrostatic/Hydrodynamic Journal Bearings for Optimum Self-Compensation Under Misaligning External Loads

[+] Author and Article Information
L. F. Martinez Esparza

Mem. ASME
College of Aeronautics,
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical
University-Worldwide,
P. O. Box 3891,
Chinle, AZ 86503
e-mail: martil24@erau.edu

J. G. Cervantes de Gortari

Fellow ASME
Facultad de Ingeniería,
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México,
Ciudad Universitaria,
Coyoacán, D. F. 04510, México
e-mail: jgonzalo@unam.mx

E. J. Chicurel Uziel

Mem. ASME
Instituto de Ingeniería,
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México,
Ciudad Universitaria,
Coyoacán, D. F. 04510, México
e-mail: ecu@pumas.iingen.unam.mx

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Tribology Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TRIBOLOGY. Manuscript received August 1, 2016; final manuscript received October 22, 2016; published online April 4, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Joichi Sugimura.

J. Tribol 139(4), 041702 (Apr 04, 2017) (12 pages) Paper No: TRIB-16-1238; doi: 10.1115/1.4035157 History: Received August 01, 2016; Revised October 22, 2016

A method to design hybrid hydrostatic/hydrodynamic journal bearings, with the criterion of optimized self-compensation under misaligning loads, is presented. An analysis considering laminar and turbulent flow of a Newtonian incompressible lubricant between the bearing and a misaligned shaft, with restricted lubricant supply to each recess, is discussed. The mathematical model considers the modified steady-state Reynolds lubrication equation, an exact function for the local bearing radial clearance with a misaligned shaft, the continuity integral–differential equations at the recess limits, and boundary conditions at the cavitation zone and outer limits. The finite-difference method was used, and a modular computer program was developed. The procedure follows a univariate search to determine the optimum size and position of recesses and therefore obtain the design with the maximum reactive moment under misaligning loads. A validation of the model was obtained comparing the results with experimental and calculated data from the literature. Results for a 4 + 4 LBP hybrid bearing design are presented.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Reference systems, eccentric-misaligned journal

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Reference systems, misalignment angles

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Cross section parallel to plane X-Y at a point G of Fig. 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Lubrication system, manifold at constant pressure ps

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Computer program flow diagram

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Relative eccentricity versus Sommerfeld number, hydrodynamic partial bearing, comparison with experimental data [24]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Relative eccentricity versus specific load, hydrodynamic partial bearing. This model's results and experimental data from Ref. [24].

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Maximum approach angle versus relative eccentricity, hydrodynamic partial bearing, comparison with experimental data [24]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

This model's sample pressure distribution hydrodynamic partial bearing with cavitation zone

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Hydrostatic bearing, 4 recesses, LOP, 4 axial slots [25]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Dimensionless load capacity and dimensionless lubricant flow versus relative eccentricity, comparison with data from Ref. [25]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

This model's pressure distribution, hydrostatic bearing, 4 recesses, LOP, 4 axial slots between recesses

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Hybrid bearing, 4 + 4 recesses, LBP

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Moment of force versus recess relative axial position

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Dimensionless moment and ε versus relative recess axial position

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Dimensionless moment and ε versus recess relative axial length

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Dimensionless moment and ε versus recess relative width

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Dimensionless moment and ε versus recess angular position

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Dimensionless moment and ε versus restrictor's capillary resistance

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Dimensionless moments and ε versus Sommerfeld number

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

Dimensionless flow and ε versus Sommerfeld number

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 22

This model's pressure distribution, hybrid bearing, and design for optimum self-compensation based on Fig. 13, view 1. S=0.5433,pmax=23.5 MPa.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 23

This model's pressure distribution, hybrid bearing, and design for optimum self-compensation based on Fig. 13, view 2. S=0.5433,pmax=23.5 MPa.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 24

This model misaligned radial clearance distribution, hybrid bearing, design from Fig. 13

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In