0
Research Papers: Friction and Wear

Effect of Load and Temperature on the Tribological Characteristics of a Steel Pin on Polyoxymethylene Disk Interface

[+] Author and Article Information
Matthew G. Larson

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Bradley University,
1501 W. Bradley Avenue,
Peoria, IL 61625
e-mail: mlarson@mail.bradley.edu

Shannon J. Timpe

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Bradley University,
1501 W. Bradley Avenue,
Peoria, IL 61625
e-mail: sjtimpe@fsmail.bradley.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Tribology Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TRIBOLOGY. Manuscript received August 15, 2016; final manuscript received November 8, 2016; published online April 4, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Min Zou.

J. Tribol 139(5), 051603 (Apr 04, 2017) (5 pages) Paper No: TRIB-16-1263; doi: 10.1115/1.4035341 History: Received August 15, 2016; Revised November 08, 2016

The static and dynamic friction properties of a steel pin on polyoxymethelyne homopolymer disk were studied at temperatures ranging from 22 to 160 °C. Samples were tested at externally applied normal loads ranging from 20 to 80 N. Under this range of temperatures, the friction coefficients displayed a linearly increasing dependence on the load. The load dependence is attributed to an enhanced contribution of the plowing friction mechanism at higher loads. As load increases, the pin asperities penetrate into the hard, injection mold-induced skin layer, causing an increase in the frictional plowing. The coefficient of friction was observed to decrease from 0.08 at 22 °C to 0.05 at 50 °C, and subsequently rise to 0.07 at 160 °C. The initial drop was caused by a decrease in the modulus of elasticity attributed to the rise in molecular mobility with increased available thermal energy. As the temperature increased to 160 °C, however, the further decrease in modulus allowed the penetration of the pin asperities to increase significantly, requiring increased material displacement to initiate frictional motion.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Brazel, C. S. , and Rosen, S. L. , 2012, Fundamental Principles of Polymeric Materials, Wiley, New York, Chap. 6.
Brazel, C. S. , and Rosen, S. L. , 2012, Fundamental Principles of Polymeric Materials, Wiley, New York, Chap. 16.
Bessonova, N. P. , Volegova, I. A. , Konyukhova, Y. V. , Flexman, E. A. , and Godovsky, Y. K. , 1996, “ Study of Temperature Transitions in Solid Poly(Oxymethylene) by Thermal Analysis Methods,” J. Therm. Anal., 46(3), pp. 773–783. [CrossRef]
Bhushan, B. , 2002, Introduction to Tribology, Wiley, New York, Chap. 5.
Lancaster, J. K. , 1969, “ Abrasive Wear of Polymers,” Wear, 14(4), pp. 223–239. [CrossRef]
Agrawal, S. , Singh, K. K. , and Sarkar, P. K. , 2014, “ Impact Damage on Fibre-Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composite—A Review,” J. Compos. Mater., 48(3), pp. 317–332. [CrossRef]
Barbosa, C. N. , Viana, J. C. , Franzen, M. , and Simoes, R. , 2012, “ Effect of the Impact Conditions on the Mechanical Properties of Injection-Molded Parts,” Polym. Eng. Sci., 52(9), pp. 1845–1853. [CrossRef]
Fox, R. T. , Wani, V. , Howard, K. E. , Bogle, A. , and Kempe, L. , 2008, “ Conductive Polymer Composite Materials and Their Utility in Electromagnetic Shielding Applications,” J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 107(4), pp. 2558–2566. [CrossRef]
Bhushan, B. , 2002, Introduction to Tribology, Wiley, New York, Chap. 7.
Samyn, P. , and De Baets, P. , 2005, “ Friction of Polyoxymethylene Homopolymer in Highly Loaded Applications Extrapolated From Small-Scale Testing,” Tribol. Lett., 19(3), pp. 177–189. [CrossRef]
Archard, J. F. , 1953, “ Contact and Rubbing of Flat Surface,” J. Appl. Phys., 24(8), pp. 981–988. [CrossRef]
Eger, C. , Zhang, H. , Zhang, H. , Zhang, Z. , and Zhou, L. , 2013, “ Abrasive Wear of Transparent Polymer Coatings: Considered in Terms of Morphology and Surface Modification of Nanoparticles,” Compos. Sci. Technol., 88, pp. 151–157. [CrossRef]
Avient, W. E. , Goddard, T. , and Wilman, H. , 1960, “ An Experimental Study of Friction and Wear During Abrasion of Metals,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 258(1293), pp. 159–180. [CrossRef]
Bunten, M. M. , and Timpe, S. J. , 2012, “ Effect of Velocity and Load on the Development of Kinetic Friction at a Lubricated Steel on Polymer Interface,” ASME Paper No. IMECE2012-86991.
Mergler, Y. J. , Schaake, R. P. , and Huis in't Veld, A. J. , 2004, “ Material Transfer of POM in Sliding Contact,” Wear, 256(3–4), pp. 294–301. [CrossRef]
De Baets, P. , Kalacska, G. , Samyn, P. , Van Parys, F. , Van Peteghem, A. P. , and Zsidai, L. , 2002, “ The Tribological Behavior of Engineering Plastics During Sliding Friction Investigated With Small-Scale Specimens,” Wear, 253(5–6), pp. 673–688.
Czichos, H. , and Santner, E. , 1989, “ Tribology of Polymers,” Tribol. Int., 22(2), pp. 103–109. [CrossRef]
Chen, Y. , Zhong, G. , Hsiao, B. , and Li, Z. , 2013, “ Structure Evolution Upon Uniaxial Drawing Skin- and Core-Layers of Injection-Molded Isotactic Polypropylene by In Situ Synchrotron X-Ray Scattering,” J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys., 51(22), pp. 1618–1631.
Guo, C. , Liu, F. H. , Liu, H. , Wu, X. , and Zhang, J. , 2011, “ Morphological Evolution of HDPE Parts in the Microinjection Molding: Comparison With Conventional Injection Molding,” J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 126(2), pp. 452–462. [CrossRef]
Friedrich, K. , and Pistor, C. , 1997, “ Scratch and Indentation Tests on Polyoxymethylene (POM),” J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 66(10), pp. 1985–1996. [CrossRef]
Apichartpattanasiri, S. , Hay, J. N. , and Kukureka, S. N. , 2001, “ A Study of the Tribological Behavior of Polymide 66 With Varying Injection-Moulding Parameters,” Wear, 251(1–12), pp. 1557–1566. [CrossRef]
Bohm, H. , Betz, S. , and Ball, A. , 1990, “ The Wear Resistance of Polymers,” Tribol. Int., 23(6), pp. 399–406. [CrossRef]
Tashiro, K. , Kobayashi, M. , and Tadokoro, H. , 1994, “ Mechanical Properties and Deformation Mechanism of Polyoxymethylene Chain in the Crystalline State,” Polym. Eng. Sci., 34(4), pp. 308–316. [CrossRef]
Plummer, C. J. G. , Cudre-Mauroux, N. , and Kausch, H. H. , 1994, “ Deformation and Entanglement in Semicrystalline Polymer,” Polym. Eng. Sci., 34(4), pp. 318–329. [CrossRef]
Cao, S. , Wang, X. , and Wu, Z. , 2011, “ Evaluation and Prediction of Temperature Dependent Tensile Strength of Unidirectional Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites,” J. Reinf. Plast. Compos., 30(9), pp. 799–807. [CrossRef]
Larson, M. G. , and Timpe, S. J. , 2014, “ Static and Dynamic Friction Characteristics of a Steel on Polyoxymethylene Interface Under Dry and Lubricated Contact Conditions,” ASME Paper No. IMECE2014-38345.
Johnson, K. L. , Kendall, K. , and Roberts, A. D. , 1971, “ Surface Energy and the Contact of Elastic Solids,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 324(1558), pp. 301–313. [CrossRef]
Derjaguin, B. V. , Muller, V. M. , and Toporov, Y. P. , 1975, “ Effect of Contact Deformations on the Adhesion of Particles,” J. Colloid Interface Sci., 53(2), pp. 314–326. [CrossRef]
Maugis, D. , 1992, “ Adhesion of Spheres: The JKR-DMT Transition Using a Dugdale Model,” J. Colloid Interface Sci., 150(1), pp. 243–269. [CrossRef]
Wu, S. , 1989, in Polymer Handbook, 3rd ed., J. Brandrup and E. H. Immergut , eds., Wiley-Interscience, New York, pp. III: 221–228.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

(a) The pin-on-disk test apparatus with the normal load applied using a free floating loading arm and a load cell positioned to measure the tangential load and (b) a close-up view of the interface

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

A characteristic data set. The upper dashed line indicates the initial peak in friction forces corresponding to the static friction and the lower dashed line corresponds to the dynamic friction force during steady-state sliding.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

The static and dynamic friction coefficients as a function of the externally applied normal load. The markers represent individual measurements. All tests were performed at 160 °C.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

The static coefficient of friction as a function of the test temperature. The bottom and top error bars represent the minimum and maximum values, the lower and upper boxes represent the lower and upper quartiles, and the central lines represent the median values.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In