0
Research Papers: Other (Seals, Manufacturing)

Steady-State Response of a Flexibly Mounted Stator Mechanical Face Seal Subject to Dynamic Forcing of a Flexible Rotor

[+] Author and Article Information
Philip Varney

Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering,
Georgia Institute of Technology,
Atlanta, GA 30318
e-mail: pvarney3@gatech.edu

Itzhak Green

Professor
Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering,
Georgia Institute of Technology,
Atlanta, GA 30318
e-mail: itzhak.green@me.gatech.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Tribology Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TRIBOLOGY. Manuscript received May 9, 2016; final manuscript received March 25, 2017; published online June 14, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Mihai Arghir.

J. Tribol 139(6), 062201 (Jun 14, 2017) (9 pages) Paper No: TRIB-16-1157; doi: 10.1115/1.4036380 History: Received May 09, 2016; Revised March 25, 2017

Mechanical face seals are constitutive components of much larger turbomachines and require consideration of the system dynamics for successful design. The dynamic interplay between the seal and rotor is intensified by recent trends toward reduced clearances, higher speeds, and more flexible rotors. Here, the “rotor” consists of the flexible shaft and the rotating seal seat. The objective here is to, for the first time, determine how the rotor affects the seal performance and vice versa. Thresholds can then be established beyond which the rotor influences the seal but not vice versa (i.e., the rotordynamics can be sent to the seal analysis as an exogenous input). To this end, a model of a flexibly mounted stator face seal is provided including the coupled dynamics of the flexible rotor. The model accounts for axial and angular deflections of the rotor and seal. Coupled rotordynamics are modeled using a lumped-parameter approach including static and dynamic rotor angular misalignments. For expediency, linearized expressions for fluid forces are used, and the resulting steady-state equations of motion are solved analytically to investigate how rotor inertia, speed, and angular misalignment influence the coupled seal dynamics. Importantly, results from the study reveal that in some operating regimes, neglecting the rotordynamics implies healthy seal operation when instead intermittent rub exists between the faces. This work also shows that when the rotor inertia is much larger than the seal inertia, the rotordynamics can be solved separately and used in the seal model as an external input.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Steinetz, B. M. , Hendricks, R. C. , and Munson, J. , 1998, “ Advanced Seal Technology Role in Meeting Next Generation Turbine Engine Goals,” NASA, Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH, Technical Report No. 20000020798.
Chupp, R. E. , Hendricks, R. C. , Lattime, S. B. , and Steinetz, B. M. , 2006, “ Sealing in Turbomachinery,” NASA, Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, OH, Technical Report No. 2006-214341.
Green, I. , and Etsion, I. , 1983, “ Fluid Film Dynamic Coefficients in Mechanical Face Seals,” ASME J. Lubr. Technol., 105(2), pp. 297–302. [CrossRef]
Green, I. , and Etsion, I. , 1986, “ Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of Noncontacting Coned-Face Mechanical Seals,” ASLE Trans., 29(3), pp. 383–393. [CrossRef]
Green, I. , 1990, “ Gyroscopic and Damping Effects on the Stability of a Noncontacting Flexibly-Mounted Rotor Mechanical Face Seal,” Dynamics of Rotating Machinery, Hemisphere, Carlsbad, CA, pp. 153–157.
Etsion, I. , and Constantinescu, I. , 1984, “ Experimental Observation of the Dynamic Behavior of Noncontacting Coned-Face Mechanical Seals,” ASLE Trans., 27(3), pp. 263–270. [CrossRef]
Lee, A. S. , and Green, I. , 1995, “ An Experimental Investigation of the Steady-State Response of a Noncontacting Flexibly Mounted Rotor Mechanical Face Seal,” ASME J. Tribol., 117(1), pp. 153–159. [CrossRef]
Varney, P. , and Green, I. , 2016, “ Impact Phenomena in a Non Contacting Mechanical Face Seal,” ASME J. Tribol., 139(2), p. 022201.
Etsion, I. , and Halperin, G. , 2002, “ A Laser Surface Textured Hydrostatic Mechanical Seal,” Tribol. Trans., 45(3), pp. 430–434. [CrossRef]
Green, I. , 2002, “ A Transient Dynamic Analysis of Mechanical Seals Including Asperity Contact and Face Deformation,” Tribol. Trans., 45(3), pp. 284–293. [CrossRef]
Lee, A. S. , and Green, I. , 1994, “ Rotordynamics of a Mechanical Face Seal Riding on a Flexible Shaft,” ASME J. Tribol., 116(2), pp. 345–351. [CrossRef]
Wileman, J. , and Green, I. , 1991, “ The Rotordynamic Coefficients of Mechanical Seals Having Two Flexibly Mounted Rotors,” ASME J. Tribol., 113(4), pp. 795–804. [CrossRef]
Wileman, J. , and Green, I. , 1997, “ Steady-State Analysis of Mechanical Seals With Two Flexibly Mounted Rotors,” ASME J. Tribol., 119(1), pp. 200–204. [CrossRef]
Wileman, J. , and Green, I. , 1999, “ Parametric Investigation of the Steady-State Response of a Mechanical Seal With Two Flexibly Mounted Rotors,” ASME J. Tribol., 121(1), pp. 69–76. [CrossRef]
Wileman, J. , and Green, I. , 1996, “ The Rotor Dynamic Coefficients of Eccentric Mechanical Face Seals,” ASME J. Tribol., 118(1), pp. 215–224. [CrossRef]
Wileman, J. , 2004, “ Dynamic Response of Eccentric Face Seals to Synchronous Shaft Whirl,” ASME J. Tribol., 126(2), pp. 301–309. [CrossRef]
Green, I. , 2008, “ On the Kinematics and Kinetics of Mechanical Seals, Rotors, and Wobbling Bodies,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 43(7), pp. 909–917. [CrossRef]
Green, I. , and Etsion, I. , 1986, “ Pressure and Squeeze Effects on the Dynamic Characteristics of Elastomer O-Rings Under Small Reciprocating Motion,” ASME J. Tribol., 108(3), pp. 439–444. [CrossRef]
Green, I. , and Casey, C. , 2005, “ Crack Detection in a Rotor Dynamic System by Vibration Monitoring—Part I: Analysis,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 127(2), pp. 425–436. [CrossRef]
Varney, P. , and Green, I. , 2012, “ Crack Detection in a Rotor Dynamic System by Vibration Monitoring—Part II: Extended Analysis and Experimental Results,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 134(11), p. 112501. [CrossRef]
Etsion, I. , 1982, “ Dynamic Analysis of Noncontacting Face Seals,” ASME J. Tribol., 104(4), pp. 460–468.
Etsion, I. , 1980, “ Squeeze Effects in Radial Face Seals,” ASME J. Lubr. Technol., 102(2), pp. 145–151. [CrossRef]
Etsion, I. , and Sharoni, A. , 1980, “ Performance of End-Face Seals With Diametral Tilt and Coning—Hydrostatic Effects,” ASLE Trans., 23(3), pp. 279–288. [CrossRef]
Sharoni, A. , and Etsion, I. , 1981, “ Performance of End-Face Seals With Diametral Tilt and Coning—Hydrodynamic Effects,” ASLE Trans., 24(1), pp. 61–70. [CrossRef]
Green, I. , 1987, “ The Rotor Dynamic Coefficients of Coned-Face Mechanical Seals With Inward or Outward Flow,” ASME J. Tribol., 109(1), pp. 129–135. [CrossRef]
Green, I. , 1989, “ Gyroscopic and Support Effects on the Steady-State Response of a Noncontacting Flexibly Mounted Rotor Mechanical Face Seal,” ASME J. Tribol., 111(2), pp. 200–208. [CrossRef]
Green, I. , and Etsion, I. , 1986, “ A Kinematic Model for Mechanical Seals With Antirotation Locks or Positive Drive Devices,” ASME J. Tribol., 108(1), pp. 42–45. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

FMS seal configuration showing the flexible rotor and stationary seal element

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Reference frames used to model the kinematics of a flexibly mounted stator mechanical face seal

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Comparing the numeric solution of the full nonlinear equations of motion to the analytic solution of the linearized equations of motion (δ = 2)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Investigating the influence of FMS dynamics on rotor response for an angular misalignment of χ=0.5 mrad, δ = 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Relative tilt versus rotor–stator inertia ratio for thin and thick rotors: (a) thick rotor (δ = 2) and (b) thin rotor (δ = 0.5)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Relative tilt versus shaft speed for several values of angular misalignment, highlighting the appearance of face contact when coupled rotordynamics are included (δ=2,Itr/Its=50)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Relative tilt versus shaft speed ωr and rotor inertia ratio δ=Itr/Ipr (χ = 0.5 mrad): (a) case when the rotor inertia is much larger than the FMS (Itr/Its  = 50) and (b) case when the rotor inertia is comparable to the FMS (Itr/Its  = 2)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In