0
Research Papers: Friction and Wear

Tribological Characterization of AZ91 and AE42 Magnesium Alloys in Fretting Contact

[+] Author and Article Information
D. Khabale

Tribology Laboratory,
Mechanical Engineering Department,
National Institute of Technology Srinagar,
Hazratbal,
Srinagar 190006, Jammu and Kashmir, India

M. F. Wani

Tribology Laboratory,
Mechanical Engineering Department,
National Institute of Technology Srinagar,
Hazratbal,
Srinagar 190006, Jammu and Kashmir, India
e-mail: mfwani@nitsri.net

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Tribology Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TRIBOLOGY. Manuscript received January 21, 2017; final manuscript received May 6, 2017; published online July 21, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Dae-Eun Kim.

J. Tribol 140(1), 011604 (Jul 21, 2017) (21 pages) Paper No: TRIB-17-1028; doi: 10.1115/1.4036922 History: Received January 21, 2017; Revised May 06, 2017

Fretting wear studies were conducted on AZ91 and AE42 magnesium alloys against steel ball. Average coefficient of friction (COF) remains steady with the increase in running time. However, average coefficient of friction decreases with the increase in normal load and frequency and marginally increases with the increase in amplitude. A constant average coefficient of friction of 0.06 was observed for both AZ91 and AE42 under dry sliding conditions at normal load of 50 N. Wear volume increases linearly with increasing running time. Wear volume first decreases sharply, attains minima, and then increases marginally with the increase in normal load. However, wear volume increases with increasing amplitude and frequency. Higher specific wear rate of 10.5 × 10−6 mm3 N−1·m−1 was observed for AE42, as compared to 4.5 × 10−6 mm3 N−1·m−1 for AZ91. The wear in magnesium alloy was caused by a combination of adhesion, abrasion, oxidation, delamination, and plastic deformation under different fretting conditions.

Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Etsion, I. , 2010, “ Revisiting the Cattaneo-Mindlin Concept of Interfacial Slip in Tangentially Loaded Compliant Bodies,” ASME J. Tribol., 132(2), pp. 1–9. [CrossRef]
Wani, M. F. , 2007, “ Fretting Wear of Si-Al-O-N,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part J, 221(6), pp. 653–659. [CrossRef]
Wagle, S. , and Kato, H. , 2009, “ Ultrasonic Detection of Fretting Fatigue Damage at Bolt Joints of Aluminium Alloy Plates,” Int. J. Fatigue, 31(8–9), pp. 1378–1385. [CrossRef]
Mehta, D. S. , Masood, S. H. , and Song, W. Q. , 2004, “ Investigation of Wear Properties of Magnesium and Aluminum Alloys for Automotive Applications,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 155–156, pp. 1526–1531. [CrossRef]
U.S. Department of Transportation FAA, 1994, “ Literature Review and Preliminary Studies of Fretting and Fretting Fatigue Including Special Application to Aircraft Joints,” FAA Technical Centre Atlantic City International Airport, Egg Harbor Township, NJ/National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA.
Manoj Kumar, B. V. , Basu, B. , Murthy, V. S. R. , and Gupta, M. , 2005, “ The Role of Tribochemistry on Fretting Wear of Mg–SiC Particulate Composites,” Composites, A, 36(1), pp. 13–23. [CrossRef]
Sikdar, K. , Shekhar, S. , and Balani, K. , 2014, “ Fretting Wear of Mg–Li–Al Based Alloys,” Wear, 318(1–2), pp. 177–187. [CrossRef]
Huanga, W. , Hou, B. , Pang, Y. , and Zhou, Z. , 2006, “ Fretting Wear Behavior of AZ91D and AM60B Magnesium Alloys,” Wear, 260(11–12), pp. 1173–1178. [CrossRef]
Yue, T. , and Wahab, M. A. , 2017, “ FEA of Fretting Wear Under Variable COF and Different Contact Regimes,” Tribol. Int., 107, pp. 274–282. [CrossRef]
Done, V. , Kesavan, D. , Krishna, M. , Chhaise, T. , and Nelias, D. , 2017, “ Semi Analytical Fretting Wear Simulation Including Wear Debris,” Tribol. Int., 109, pp. 1–9. [CrossRef]
Pasanen, A. , Lehtovaara, A. , Rabb, R. , and Riihimaki, P. , 2009, “ Friction Behaviour of Quenched and Tempered Steel in Partial and Gross Slip Conditions in Fretting Point Contact,” Wear, 267(12), pp. 2200–2207. [CrossRef]
De Baets, P. , and Strijckmans, K. , 1996, “ Thin Layer Activation for Measuring Friction and Wear and Material Transfer in Iron Alloys,” Tribol. Int., 29(4), pp. 307–312. [CrossRef]
Xin, L. , Yang, B. B. , Wang, Z. H. , Li, J. , Lu, Y. H. , and Shoji, T. , 2016, “ Effect of Normal Force on Fretting Wear Behaviour and Mechanism of Alloy 690TT in High Temperature Water,” Wear, 368–369, pp. 210–218. [CrossRef]
Kalin, M. , and Vizintin, J. , 2000, “ Use of Equations for Wear Volume Determination in Fretting Experiments,” Wear, 237(1), pp. 39–48. [CrossRef]
Fouvry, S. , Kapsa, P. , and Vincent, L. , 1998, “ Developments of Fretting Sliding Criteria to Quantify the Local Friction Coefficient Evolution Under Partial Slip Condition,” Tribology for Energy Conservation, D. Dowson , ed., Elsevier Science B. V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 161–172. [CrossRef]
Moreno, I. P. , Nandy, T. K. , Jones, J. W. , Allison, J. E. , and Pollock, T. M. , 2003, “ Microstructural Stability and Creep of Rare Earth Containing Magnesium Alloys,” Scr. Mater., 48(8), pp. 1029–1034. [CrossRef]
Wenwen, D. , Yangshan, D. , Xuegang, M. , Feng, X. , Min, Z. , and Dengyun, W. , 2003, “ Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Mg–Al Based Alloy With Calcium and Rare Earth Additions,” Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 356(1–2), pp. 1–7. [CrossRef]
Zafari, A. , Ghasemi, H. M. , and Mahmudi, R. , 2012, “ Tribological Behavior of AZ91D Magnesium Alloy at Elevated Temperatures,” Wear, 292–293, pp. 33–40. [CrossRef]
Zafari, A. , Ghasemi, H. M. , and Mahmudi, R. , 2013, “ Effect of Rare Earth Elements Addition on the Tribological Behavior of AZ91D Magnesium Alloy at Elevated Temperatures,” Wear, 303(1–2), pp. 98–108. [CrossRef]
McColl, I. R. , Ding, J. , and Leen, S. B. , 2004, “ Finite Element Simulation and Experimental Validation of Fretting Wear,” Wear, 256(11–12), pp. 1114–1127. [CrossRef]
Fouvry, S. , 2001, “ Shakedown Analysis and Fretting Wear Response Under Gross Slip Condition,” Wear, 251(1–12), pp. 1320–1331. [CrossRef]
Bowden, P. , and Tabor, D. , 1973, Friction: An Introduction to Tribology, Doubleday, New York.
Hager, C. H. , Sanders, J. H. , and Sharma, S. , 2004, “ Characterization of Mixed and Gross Slip Fretting Wear Regimes in Ti6Al4V Interfaces at Room Temperature,” Wear, 257(1–2), pp. 167–180. [CrossRef]
Ramesh, R. , and Gnanamoorthy, R. , 2006, “ Fretting Wear Behavior of Liquid Nitrided Structural Steel, En24 and Bearing Steel, En31,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 171(1), pp. 61–67. [CrossRef]
Kapsa, P. , Fouvry, S. , and Vincent, L. , 2005, “ Basic Principles of Fretting,” Wear: Material, Mechanisms and Practice, G. W. Stachowiak , ed., Wiley, West Sussex, UK, pp. 317–337. [CrossRef]
Fouvry, S. , Kapsa, P. , and Vincent, L. , 2000, “ Fretting Wear and Fretting Fatigue: Relation Through a Mapping Concept,” Fretting Fatigue: Current Technology and Practices, D. W. Hoeppner , V. Chandrasekaran , and C. B. Eillot III , eds., ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA, pp. 49–63. [CrossRef]
Shanthi, M. , Lim, C. Y. H. , and Lu, L. , 2007, “ Effects of Grain Size on the Wear of Recycled AZ91 Mg,” Tribol. Int., 40(2), pp. 335–338. [CrossRef]
Aung, N. N. , Zhou, W. , and Lim, L. E. N. , 2008, “ Wear Behaviour of AZ91D Alloy at Low Sliding Speeds,” Wear, 265(5–6), pp. 780–786. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Optical micrograph of wear track of disk

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

(a) Universal tribometer with fretting test setup. (b) Schematic of fretting wear test setup: (1)—disk sample, (2)—clamp for disk sample, (3)—ball specimen, (4)—ball holder, (5)—electromagnetic reciprocating drive, (6)—load actuator, (7)—arm, (8)—piezoelectric sensor, and (9)—supporting frame.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Optical micrographs of (a) AZ91 and (b) AE42 as cast magnesium alloys

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

(a) SEM micrograph of AE42, (b) EDS of four different points: (c) point 1, (d) point 2, (e) point 3, and (f) point 4

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

HV versus indentation load/dwell time: (a) AZ91 (indentation load), (b) AE42 (indentation load), (c) AZ91 (dwell time), and (d) AE42 (dwell time)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Indent image of AZ91 alloy at different indentation load: (a) 20 g, (b) 50 g, (c) 100 g, and (d) 200 g for 10 s dwell time

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Average coefficient of friction (μ) versus frequency (Hz)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Average coefficient of friction (μ) versus running time

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Average coefficient of friction (μ) versus normal load (N)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Average coefficient of friction (μ) versus fretting amplitude (μm)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Wear volume (mm3) versus running time

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Wear volume (mm3) versus normal load (N)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Wear volume (mm3) versus fretting amplitude (μm)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Wear volume (mm3) versus frequency (Hz)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Specific wear rate for AZ91, AE42, and steel ball

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

SEM micrographs of alloy wear tracks after 10 h fretting test: (a) AZ91 disk, (b) AE42 disk, (c) steel ball of AZ91, and (d) steel ball of AE42

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

(a) EDS spectrum of different points on AZ91 disk wear track after 10 h of fretting test and (b) EDS spectrum of different points on counterface steel ball wear track against AZ91 after 10 h fretting test

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Friction plot and hysteresis loops for AZ91 magnesium alloy obtained at normal loads: (a) 5 N, (b) 50 N, and (c) 150 N

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Wear track of AZ91 at 5 N normal load: (a) optical micrograph, (b) SEM micrograph, and (c) EDS spectrum

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

(a) Optical micrograph, (b) SEM micrograph, and (c) its EDS spectrum for AZ91 at 150 N normal load

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

Three-dimensional profilometry image and surface texture for AZ91 wear tracks at different loads: (a) 5 N, (b) 50 N, and (c) 150 N

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 22

(a) Optical micrograph, (b) SEM micrograph, and (c) its EDS spectrum for AZ91 at 125 μm amplitude

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 23

Optical micrographs and SEM micrographs of AE42 wear track under 5 Hz frequency: (a) optical of AE42 disk, (b) SEM of AE 42 disk, (c) optical micrograph of counterface steel ball, and (d) SEM of counterface steel ball

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 24

EDS of counterface steel ball wear track against AE42 under 5 Hz frequency

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 25

Optical micrographs and SEM of AE42 wear track under 60 Hz frequency: (a) optical AE42 disk, (b) SEM of AE 42 disk, (c) optical of counterface steel ball, and (d) SEM of counterface steel ball

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 26

(a) EDS spectrum of different points on AE42 disk wear track under 60 Hz frequency and (b) EDS spectrum of different points on counterface steel ball wear track against AE42 under 60 Hz frequency

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 27

Three-dimensional profilometery image and surface texture of AE42 alloy wear track under different frequency: (a) 5 Hz and (b) 60 Hz

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In