Research Papers: Friction and Wear

Synergetic Effect of Cryorolling and Postroll Aging on Simultaneous Increase in Wear Resistance and Mechanical Properties of an Al–Cu Alloy

[+] Author and Article Information
I. Jaseem, R. J. Immanuel, F. Khan, MD, B. N. Sahoo

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai 600036, India

P. N. Rao

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Marri Laxman Reddy Institute of
Technology and Management,
Hyderabad 500043, India

S. K. Panigrahi

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai 600036, India
e-mail: skpanigrahi@iitm.ac.in

M. Kamaraj

Department of Metallurgical and
Materials Engineering,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai 600036, India

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Tribology Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TRIBOLOGY. Manuscript received February 18, 2018; final manuscript received April 29, 2018; published online May 28, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Yi Zhu.

J. Tribol 140(6), 061607 (May 28, 2018) (11 pages) Paper No: TRIB-18-1074; doi: 10.1115/1.4040162 History: Received February 18, 2018; Revised April 29, 2018

Aluminum–copper alloy system is extensively used in structural and aerospace applications for its high strength-to-weight ratio, good mechanical and tribological properties. Improving the properties of these alloys would likely widen their application area. In the present work, an attempt has been made to simultaneously enhance the wear resistance and mechanical properties of an Al–Cu alloy, AA2014 by imparting different levels of cryorolling strains and postroll aging treatment. The wear behavior of the material is studied under dry sliding condition by pin-on-disk experiments and mechanical properties are assessed by tensile test. Formation of high fraction of dislocation density and significant refinement of microstructure during cryorolling and nucleation of fine coherent Guinier–Preston (GP) zones of Al2Cu precipitates during postcryoroll aging has led to about 100% increment in the wear resistance of the material. Tensile test results proved that the synergetic effect of cryorolling and aging treatment led to 53% increment in strength (557 MPa) without compromising the material's ductility (22.5%). A detailed investigation on the various mechanisms responsible for the enhanced wear resistance and improved mechanical performance is presented based on the microstructural evidence.

Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Starke, E. A. , and Staleyt, J. T. , 1996, “ Application of Modern Aluminum Alloys to Aircraft,” Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 32(2–3), pp. 131–172. [CrossRef]
Dursun, T. , and Soutis, C. , 2014, “ Recent Developments in Advanced Aircraft Aluminium Alloys,” Mater. Des., 56, pp. 862–871. [CrossRef]
Verlinden, B. , 2005, “ Severe Plastic Deformation of Metals,” Metalurgija, 11(3), pp. 165–182.
Chun, Y. B. , Ahn, S. H. , Shin, D. H. , and Hwang, S. K. , 2009, “ Combined Effects of Grain Size and Recrystallization on the Tensile Properties of Cryorolled Pure Vanadium,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 508(1–2), pp. 253–258. [CrossRef]
Venkateswarlu, K. , Rajinikanth, V. , Alhajeri, S. N. , and Langdon, T. G. , 2011, “ Application of High-Pressure Torsion to Al-Si Alloys With and Without Scandium Additions,” Mater. Sci. Forum, 667–669, pp. 743–748.
Eizadjou, M. , Manesh, H. D. , and Janghorban, K. , 2009, “ Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Ultra-Fine Grains (UFGs) Aluminum Strips Produced by ARB Process,” J. Alloys Compd., 474(1–2), pp. 406–415. [CrossRef]
Wang, Y. , Chen, M. , Zhou, F. , and Ma, E. , 2002, “ High Tensile Ductility in a Nanostructured Metal,” Nature, 419(6910), pp. 912–915. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Valiev, R. Z. Z. , Korznikov, A. V. V. , and Mulyukov, R. R. R. , 1993, “ Structure and Properties of Ultrafine-Grained Materials Produced by Severe Plastic Deformation,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 168(2), pp. 141–148. [CrossRef]
Kucukomeroglu, T. , 2010, “ Effect of Equal-Channel Angular Extrusion on Mechanical and Wear Properties of Eutectic Al-12Si Alloy,” Mater. Des., 31(2), pp. 782–789. [CrossRef]
Archard, J. F. , 1953, “ Contact and Rubbing of Flat Surfaces,” J. Appl. Phys., 24(8), p. 981. [CrossRef]
Immanuel, R. J. , and Panigrahi, S. K. , 2015, “ Influence of Cryorolling on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of a Cast Hypoeutectic Al–Si Alloy,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 640, pp. 424–435. [CrossRef]
Kumar, S. , Subramanya Sarma, V. , and Murty, B. S. , 2009, “ The Influence of Room Temperature and Cryogenic Temperature Rolling on the Aging and Wear Behaviour of Al–4Cu–5TiB2 In Situ Composites,” J. Alloys Compd., 479(1–2), pp. 268–273. [CrossRef]
Immanuel, R. J. , and Panigrahi, S. K. , 2016, “ Transformation of Cast A356 Ingots to Wrought Sheets With Enhanced Mechanical and Tribological Properties by Different Thermo-Mechanical Processing Routes,” Mater. Des., 101, pp. 44–55. [CrossRef]
Cheng, S. , Zhao, Y. H. , Zhu, Y. T. , and Ma, E. , 2007, “ Optimizing the Strength and Ductility of Fine Structured 2024 Al Alloy by Nano-Precipitation,” Acta Mater., 55(17), pp. 5822–5832. [CrossRef]
Dhal, A. , Panigrahi, S. K. , and Shunmugam, M. S. , 2015, “ Precipitation Phenomena, Thermal Stability and Grain Growth Kinetics in an Ultra-Fine Grained Al 2014 Alloy After Annealing Treatment,” J. Alloys Compd., 649, pp. 229–238. [CrossRef]
Tillová, E. , Chalupová, M. , and Hurtalová, L. , 2012, “ Evolution of Phases in a Recycled Al-Si Cast Alloy During Solution Treatment,” Scanning Electron Microscopy, D. V. Kazmiruk , ed., InTech, London, pp. 411–438. [CrossRef]
Williamson, G. , and Hall, W. , 1953, “ X-Ray Line Broadening From Filed Aluminium and Wolfram,” Acta Metall., 1(1), pp. 22–31. [CrossRef]
Dwivedi, D. K. , 2010, “ Adhesive Wear Behaviour of Cast Aluminium—Silicon Alloys: Overview,” Mater. Des., 31(5), pp. 2517–2531. [CrossRef]
Krishna, N. N. , Sivaprasad, K. , and Susila, P. , 2014, “ Strengthening Contributions in Ultra-High Strength Cryorolled Al-4%Cu-3%TiB2 In Situ Composite,” Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, 24(3), pp. 641–647. [CrossRef]
Kocks, U. F. , and Mecking, H. , 2003, “ Physics and Phenomenology of Strain Hardening: The FCC Case,” Prog. Mater. Sci., 48(3), pp. 171–273. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Process flow diagram showing: (a) solution treatment followed by aging and (b) cryorolling after solution treatment followed by aging

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Optical micrograph of the base solution treated material

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Transmission electron microscope micrographs showing the dislocation networks in (a) 0.6CR and (b) 1.2CR materials. The arrow heads in (b) shows the formation of ultrafine grains in 1.2CR material.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Variation in microhardness between solution treated and cryorolled materials

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Age hardening response of ST and 1.2CR materials

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Schematic representation of dislocation movement across a GP zone

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Schematic representation showing different mechanisms by which the precipitate (particle) obstructs the dislocation movement by bowing and shearing. The graph in the right side shows the strength contribution from both the mechanism with variation in the particle size.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

X-Ray diffraction pattern of base and processed materials. Inset shows a zoomed in view of XRD peak corresponding to the [111] plane of aluminum.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Variation in crystal domain size, microstrain, and dislocation density for different material conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

(a) Wear loss of materials subjected to sliding wear test for various sliding distance. (b) Average friction coefficient of different material conditions. The inset in (b) shows the image of wear pin used in the experiment.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Worn surface morphology and the corresponding EDS chemical composition data of (a) and (b) ST, (c) and (d) 0.6CR and (e) and (f) 1.2CR materials. The circled zone and the arrow head in (a), (c), and (e) indicate adhesion marks and abrasive marks, respectively.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Wear loss of solution treated and cryorolled material subjected to peak-aging treatment (STA and CRA, respectively)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Worn surface morphology and corresponding EDS chemical analysis of (a) and (b) STA and (c) and (d) CRA materials

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Engineering stress–strain graph of different material conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Normalized strain hardening rate for various material conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Scanning electron microscope fractographs showing the fracture surface of (a) ST (b) STA (c) 1.2CR and (d) CRA materials. (e) and (f) show higher magnification fractographs of 1.2CR and CRA materials, respectively. The unfilled and filled arrows in the figures indicate zones of ductile and brittle fracture, respectively.




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In