The Area of Contact Between Rough Surfaces and Flats

[+] Author and Article Information
J. A. Greenwood

Burndy Corporation, Norwalk, Conn.

J. of Lubrication Tech 89(1), 81-87 (Jan 01, 1967) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.3616906 History: Received July 12, 1965; Online August 23, 2011


If the real area of contact between surfaces is determined by ideal plastic flow of the microcontacts, then the proportionality between the area of contact and the load follows immediately. If the deformation mode is elastic, or elastic-plastic, or plastic with work-hardening, which will be the usual cases, then the proportionality is harder to explain. However, by considering the statistical distribution of heights of the surface asperities, it can be shown that the average size of a microcontact is almost constant, independent of load; consequently, the fact that the contact pressure at a single micro-contact may vary with contact size becomes irrelevant. If the real origin of the laws of friction is in the statistics of surface roughness and not in a particular mode of deformation, the applicability of the Bowden and Tabor theory of friction to plastics and other nonmetals becomes more readily understandable.

Copyright © 1967 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.





Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In