A Comparison of Tilting Pad Thrust Bearing Lubricant Supply Methods

[+] Author and Article Information
A. M. Mikula

Kingsbury, Inc., Philadelphia, Pa. 19154

R. S. Gregory

Research and Development, Kingsbury, Inc., Philadelphia, Pa. 19154

J. of Lubrication Tech 105(1), 39-45 (Jan 01, 1983) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.3254540 History: Received February 16, 1981; Online November 13, 2009


This paper compares three different lubricant supply methods—pressurized supply (flooded), spray feed, and leading edge distribution groove—and analyzes their influence on the performance of tilting pad, equalizing thrust bearings. The paper presents experimental data on 267 mm (10-1/2 in.) o.d. bearings, operating at shaft speeds up to 13,000 rpm with loads ranging up to 3.45 MPa (500 psi). The data presented demonstrate the effect each lubricant supply method has on bearing power loss and temperature. Conclusions are drawn, based upon the effectiveness of each design, to guide the potential user.

Copyright © 1983 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.





Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In