Simulation of Wear Through Mass Balance in a Dry Contact

[+] Author and Article Information
Nicolas Fillot, Ivan Iordanoff, Yves Berthier

Laboratoire de Mécanique des Contacts et des Solides UMR INSA-CNRS 5514, INSA de Lyon, Bat Jean D’Alembert, 20 avenue Albert Einstein, 69621 Villeurbanne Cedex, France

J. Tribol 127(1), 230-237 (Feb 07, 2005) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1828437 History: Received February 20, 2004; Revised August 30, 2004; Online February 07, 2005
Copyright © 2005 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Meng,  H. C., and Ludema,  K. C., 1995, “Wear Models and Predictive Equations: Their Form and Content,” Wear, 181–183, pp. 443–457.
Berthier, Y., 2001, “Background on Friction and Wear,” Handbook of Materials Behavior Models, J. Lemaitre, ed., Academic Press, San Diego, Section 8.2, pp. 677–697.
Archard,  J. F., 1953, “Contact and Rubbing of Flat Surfaces,” J. Appl. Phys., 24, pp. 981–988.
Barwell,  F. T., 1957, “Wear of Metals,” Wear, 1, pp. 317–332.
Godet,  M., 1984, “The Third Body Approach: A Mechanical View of Wear,” Wear, 100, pp. 437–452.
Godet,  M., 1990, “Third-Bodies in Tribology,” Wear, 136, pp. 29–45.
Berthier, Y., 1995, “Maurice Godet’s Third Body,” 22nd Leeds-Lyon Symposium on Tribology, Tribology Series, 31 , pp. 21–30.
Eleod, A., Oucherif, F., Devecz, J., and Berthier, Y., 1998, “Conception of Numerical and Experimental Tools for Study of the Tribological Transformation of Surface TTS,” 25th Leeds-Lyon Symposium on Tribology, Tribology Series, 36 , pp. 673–682.
Sauger,  E., Fouvry,  S., Ponsonnet,  L., Kapsa,  Ph., Martin,  J. M., and Vincent,  L., 2000, “Tribologically Transformed Structure in Fretting,” Wear, 245, pp. 39–52.
Heshmat,  H., 1995, “The Quasi-Hydrodynamic Mechanism of Powder Lubrication, Part III: On Theory and Rheology of Triboparticles,” Tribol. Trans., 38, pp. 269–276.
McKeague,  K. T., and Khonsari,  M. M., 1996, “Generalized Boundary Interactions for Powder Lubricated Couette Flows,” ASME J. Tribol., 118, pp. 580–588.
Baillet,  L., Bethier,  Y., and Linck,  V., 2003, “Modeling the Consequences of Local Kinetics of the First Body on Friction and on Third Body Sources in Wear,” Wear, 255, pp. 299–308.
Öqvist,  M., 2001, “Numerical Simulations of Mild Wear Using Updated Geometry With Different Step Size Approaches,” Wear, 249, pp. 6–11.
Põdra,  P., and Andersson,  S., 1997, “Wear Simulation With the Winkler Surface Model,” Wear, 207, pp. 79–85.
Eleod,  A., Devecz,  J., and Balogh,  T., 2000, “Numerical Modeling of the Mechanical Process of Particle Detachment by Finite Element Method,” Period. Polytech., Serie Transportation Engineering,28(1-2), pp. 77–90.
Descartes, S., and Berthier, Y., 2001, “Competition Between Mechanical and Physico-Chemical Actions: Consequence on Friction. The Case of a Contact Lubricated by a Third Body Stemming From a Coating of MoS1.6,” Scientific Achievements, Industrial Applications, Future Challenges, Proceedings of the 2nd World Tribology Congress, F. Franek, W. J. Bartz, and A. Pauschitz, eds., Vienna, pp. 67–71.
Savage,  S. B., 1987, “A Simple Theory for Granular Flow of Rough, Inelastic, Spherical Particles,” J. Appl. Mech., 54, pp. 47–53.
Yu,  C. M., Craig,  K., and Tichy,  J., 1996, “Granular Collision Lubrication,” J. Rheol., 38, pp. 921–936.
Cundall,  P. A., and Strack,  O. D. L., 1979, “A Discrete Numerical Model for Granular Assemblies,” Geotechnique, 29, pp. 47–65.
Iordanoff,  I., Sève,  B., and Berthier,  Y., 2002, “Solid Third Body Analysis Using a Discrete Approach: Influence of Adhesion and Particle Size on the Macroscopic Behavior of the Contact,” ASME J. Tribol., 124, pp. 530–538.
Da Cruz, F., Chevoir, F., Roux, J.-N., and Iordanoff, I., “Macroscopic Friction and Dry Granular Materials,” 30th Leeds-Lyon Symposium on Tribology, Tribology Series, 63.
Dubujet, P., Ghaoudi, A., Chaze, M., and Sidoroff, F., 1995, “Particulate and Granular Simulation of Third Body Behavior,” 22nd Leeds–Lyon Symposium on Tribology, Elsevier Tribology Series, 31 , pp. 355–365.
Elrod, H. G., and Brewe, D. E., 1991, “Numerical Experiments With Flows of Elongated Granules,” 18th Leeds–Lyon Symposium on Tribology, Elsevier Tribology Series, 21 , pp. 219–226.
Fillot,  N., Iordanoff,  I., and Berthier,  Y., 2003, “A Granular Dynamic Model for the Degradation of Material,” ASME J. Tribol., 126, pp. 606–614.
Johnson,  K. L., Kendall,  K., and Roberts,  A. D., 1971, “Surface Energy and the Contact of Elastic Solids,” Phys. Rev. E, 324, pp. 301–313.
Verlet,  L., 1967, “Computer “Experiments” on Classical Fluids. I. Thermodynamical Properties of Lennard-Jones Molecules,” Phys. Rev., 159, pp. 98–103.
Fillot, N., Iordanoff, I., and Berthier, Y., 2003, “Kinetics of Particle Detachments: Contribution of a Granular Model,” 30th Leeds–Lyon Symposium on Tribology, Tribology Series, 43 , pp. 63–73.
Saulot, A., Iordanoff, I., Safon, C., and Berthier, Y., 2003, “Numerical Study of the Wear Flows in a Plane Contact. Effect of Third Body Rheology,” 30th Leeds–Lyon Symposium on Tribology, Tribology Series, 43 , pp. 85–93.
Lim,  S. C., and Ashby,  M. F., 1987, “Wear Mechanism Maps,” Acta Metall., 35, pp. 1–24.
Hsu,  S. M., and Shen,  M. C., 1996, “Ceramic Wear Maps,” Wear, 200, pp. 154–175.


Grahic Jump Location
The Tribological Circuit (simplified form)
Grahic Jump Location
The degradable granular material
Grahic Jump Location
The nondegradable material (lower plate)
Grahic Jump Location
Representation of the numerical contact
Grahic Jump Location
Interaction forces between two “bonded” spheres of the granular material
Grahic Jump Location
Progression of the total amount of detached (Qd cum) and ejected (Qe cum) spheres, and number of third body particles Mi
Grahic Jump Location
Progression of the total amount of detached (Qd cum) and ejected (Qe cum) spheres, and the number of third body particles Mi, with δ̄a=0 (dashed curves) and δ̄a=10−2
Grahic Jump Location
Progression of the number of third body spheres Mi without the ejection of particles (corresponding here to Qd cum). The results with particle ejection are recalled with the dashed curves.
Grahic Jump Location
Degradation flow (number of detached spheres per unit time versus the total amount of third body spheres
Grahic Jump Location
Ejection flow (the number of ejected spheres per unit time) versus the total amount of third body spheres for δ̄a=0 and δ̄a=10−2



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In