Research Papers: Hydrodynamic Lubrication

Real-Gas Effects in Foil Thrust Bearings Operating in the Turbulent Regime

[+] Author and Article Information
T. M. Conboy

Member ASME
Advanced Nuclear Concepts,
Sandia National Laboratories,
P.O. Box 5800, MS 1136,
Albuquerque, NM 87185
e-mail: tmconbo@sandia. gov

Contributed by the Tribology Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Tribology. Manuscript received July 23, 2012; final manuscript received March 4, 2013; published online May 10, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Luis San Andres.

J. Tribol 135(3), 031703 (Mar 04, 2013) (12 pages) Paper No: TRIB-12-1119; doi: 10.1115/1.4024048 History: Received July 23, 2012; Revised March 04, 2013

In this study, an elastohydrodynamic model was created for predicting the pressure field in a compliant thrust bearing assembly lubricated by high pressure CO2. This application is of significance due to ongoing research into the closed-cycle supercritical CO2 turbine as a high-efficiency alternative to steam turbines. Hardware development for this concept has been led by Sandia National Laboratories, where turbomachinery running on gas foil thrust and journal bearings is being tested. The model accounts for the fluid velocity field, hydrodynamic pressure, and frictional losses within the lubrication layer by evaluating the turbulent Reynolds equation coupled with an equation for structural deformation in the bearings, and the fluid properties database RefProp v9.0. The results of numerical simulations have been compared with empirical correlations, with reasonable agreement attained. Of particular interest is the contrast drawn between the performance of high pressure CO2 as a lubricant, and ambient pressure air. Parametric studies covering a range of fluid conditions, operating speeds, and thrust loads were carried out to illustrate the value of this model as a tool for improved understanding and further development of this nascent technology.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Angelino, G., 1967, “Perspectives for the Liquid Phase Compression Gas Turbine,” ASME J. Eng. Power, 89(2), pp. 229–237. [CrossRef]
Dostal, V., Driscoll, M. J., and Hejzlar, P., 2004, “A Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Cycle for Next Generation Nuclear Reactors,” MIT-ANP-TR-100.
Conboy, T., Wright, S., Pasch, J., Fleming, D., Rochau, G., and Fuller, R., 2012, “Performance Characteristics of an Operating Supercritical CO2 Brayton Cycle,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 134(11), p. 111703. [CrossRef]
DellaCorte, C., Radil, K., Bruckner, R., and Howard, S., 2007, “Design, Fabrication, and Performance of Open Source Generation I and II Compliant Hydrodynamic Gas Foil Bearings,” NASA/TM-2007-214691, ARL-TR-4102.
Agrawal, G., 1997, “Foil Air/Gas Bearing Technology—An Overview,” ASME Paper 97-GT-347.
Wright, S., Radel, R., Vernon, M., Rochau, G., and Pickard, P., 2010, “Operation and Analysis of a Supercritical CO2 Brayton Cycle,” SAND2010-0171.
Heshmat, H., Walowit, J., and Pinkus, O., 1983, “Analysis of Gas-Lubricated Compliant Thrust Bearings,” ASME J. Lubr. Technol., 105, pp. 638–646. [CrossRef]
Iordanoff, I., 1999, “Analysis of an Aerodynamic Compliant Foil Thrust Bearing: Method for a Rapid Design,” Trans. ASME, 121, pp. 816–822.
Bruckner, R., DellaCorte, C., and Prahl, J. 2005, “Analytic Modeling of Hydrodynamic, Thermal, and Structural Behavior of Foil Thrust Bearings,” NASA/TM-2005-213811.
Lee, D., and Kim., D., 2011, “Three-Dimensional Thermohydrodynamic Analyses of Rayleigh Step Air Foil Thrust Bearing With Radially Arranged Bump Foils,” Tribol. Trans., 54, pp 432–448. [CrossRef]
San Andreas, L., and Kim, T. H., 2010, “Thermohydrodynamic Analysis of Bump Type Gas Foil Bearings: A Model Anchored to Test Data,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 132, p. 042504.
Lee, D., Kim, D., and Sadashiva, R., 2011, “Transient Thermal Behavior of Preloaded Three-Pad Foil Bearings: Modeling and Experiments,” ASME J. Tribol., 133, p. 021703.
Briggs, M., Prahl, J., Bruckner, R., and Dykas, B., 2008, “High Pressure Performance of Foil Journal Bearings in Various Gases,” STLE/ASME 2008 International Joint Tribology Conference, Miami, FL.
Bruckner, R., 2009, “Windage Power Loss in Gas Foil Bearings and the Rotor-Stator Clearance of High Speed Generators Operating in High Pressure Environments,” Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2009, Orlando, FL.
Ng, C. W., and Pan, C. H. T., 1964, “A Linearized Turbulent Lubrication Theory,” Trans. ASME, 64, pp. 675–688.
Constantinescu, V. N., 1973, “Basic Relationships in Turbulent Lubrication and Their Extension to Include Thermal Effects,” ASME J. Lubr. Technol., pp. 147–149. [CrossRef]
Hirs, G. G., 1973, “A Bulk Flow Theory for Turbulence in Lubricant Films,” ASME J. Lubr. Technol., pp.137–146. [CrossRef]
Heshmat, C., Xu, D. S., and Heshmat, H., 2000, “Analysis of Gas-Lubricated Foil Thrust Bearings Using Coupled Finite Element and Finite Difference Methods,” ASME J. Tribol., 122, pp. 199–204. [CrossRef]
Taylor, C., and Dowson, D., 1974, “Turbulent Lubrication Theory—Application to Design,” ASME J. Lubr. Technol., 96(1), p. 47. [CrossRef]
Peng, Z.-C., and Khonsari, M. M., 2004, “Hydrodynamic Analysis of Compliant Foil Bearings With Compressible Air Flow,” ASME J. Tribol., 126, pp. 542–546. [CrossRef]
Peng, Z.-C., and Khonsari, M. M., 2006, “A Thermohydrodynamic Analysis of Foil Journal Bearings,” ASME J. Tribol., 128, pp. 534–541. [CrossRef]
Kim, T. H., 2007, “Analysis of Side End Pressurized Bump Type Gas Foil Bearings: A Model Anchored to Test Data,” Ph.D. Thesis, Texas A&M University, Texas.
Lee, D., and Kim, D., 2011, “Design and Performance Prediction of Hybrid Air Foil Thrust Bearings,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 133, p. 042501. [CrossRef]
Lemmon, E. W., Huber, M. L., and McLinden, M. O., 2010, “NIST Reference Fluid Thermodynamic and Transport Properties—REFPROP v9.0,” User's Guide, NIST Standard Reference Database 23.
Span, R., and Wagner, W., 1996, “A New Equation of State for Carbon Dioxide Covering the Fluid Region from the Triple-Point Temperature to 1100 K at Pressures up to 800 MPa,” J. Phys. Chem., 25(6), pp. 1509–1596.
Kunz, O., Klimeck, R., Wagner, W., and Jaeschke, M., 2007, “The GERG-2004 Wide-Range Equation of State for Natural Gases and Other Mixtures,” GERG Tech. Monogr. 15, Fortschr.-Ber. VDI, Düsseldorf.
Dykas, B., Bruckner, R., DellaCorte, C., Edmonds, B., and Prahl, J. 2009, “Design, Fabrication, and Performance of Foil Gas Thrust Bearings for Microturbomachinery Applications,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 131, p. 012301. [CrossRef]
DellaCorte, C., and Valco, M., 2000, “Load Capacity Estimation of Foil Air Journal Bearings for Oil-Free Turbomachinery Applications,” NASA/TM-2000-209782, ARL-TR-2334.
Dykas, B., 2006, “Factors Influencing the Performance of Foil Gas Thrust Bearings for Oil-Free Turbomachinery Applications,” Ph.D. Thesis, Case Western University, Ohio.
DellaCorte, C., and Bruckner, R., 2011, “Remaining Technical Challenges and Future Plans for Oil-Free Turbomachinery,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 133, p. 042501. [CrossRef]
Pinkus, O., 1990, Thermal Aspects of Fluid Film Tribology, ASME, New York.
Conboy, T., and Wright, S., 2011, “Modeling of Gas Foil Bearings for Supercritical CO2 Cycle Turbomachinery,” Proceedings of the Supercritical CO2 Power Cycle Symposium.
Schlichting, H., 1979, Boundary Layer Theory, 7th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of the S-CO2 turbo-alternator-compressor [3]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematic of a compliant foil thrust bearing [18]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Nomenclature used to describe the lubrication film relative to the bearing structure [18]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Values of linearized turbulence coefficients due to Hirs

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Nomenclature used to define the thrust bearing surface geometry [18]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Block diagram of the bearings model solver

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Prototype thrust bearing with one top foil removed [27]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Profile of the thrust bearings compliance coefficient α in atmospheric air

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Multipad simulation results for the pressure profile of a heavily loaded in CO2 at 1.4 MPa, 75,000 rpm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Single-pad simulation results for relative displacement of a heavily loaded bearing in CO2 at 1.4 MPa, 75,000 rpm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Variation of load capacity with runner speed

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Variation of load capacity with bearings diameter

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Variation of power loss with runner speed, CO2 and air

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Variation of stiffness with runner speed, CO2 and air

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Variation of power loss with CO2 film pressure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Variation of power loss with CO2 film temperature

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Variation of power loss with bearings diameter, for o.d./i.d. = 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Variation of film thickness and power loss with increasing thrust load

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Variation of load capacity with runner speed and CO2 film density



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In