Research Papers: Friction & Wear

A Computational Study of Dry Static Friction Between Elastoplastic Surfaces Using a Statistically Homogenized Microasperity Model

[+] Author and Article Information
Bhargava Sista

Department of Mechanical and
Materials Engineering,
University of Cincinnati,
Cincinnati, OH 45221
e-mail: sistasa@mail.uc.edu

Kumar Vemaganti

Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering
Department of Mechanical and
Materials Engineering,
University of Cincinnati,
Cincinnati, OH 45221
e-mail: Kumar.Vemaganti@uc.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Tribology Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TRIBOLOGY. Manuscript received June 5, 2014; final manuscript received October 23, 2014; published online December 12, 2014. Assoc. Editor: James R. Barber.

J. Tribol 137(2), 021601 (Apr 01, 2015) (11 pages) Paper No: TRIB-14-1126; doi: 10.1115/1.4028998 History: Received June 05, 2014; Revised October 23, 2014; Online December 12, 2014

Friction is a complex phenomenon that arises from the interaction of deforming surface microasperities and adhesive forces at very small length scales. In this work, we use a computational model to understand the effects of various physical parameters on the friction response between two similar linearly elastic-perfectly plastic surfaces. The main ingredients of the computational model are a statistical model of the surface based on a Gaussian autocorrelation function (ACF), a parametric representation of the normal and shear responses of a single microasperity, and a statistical homogenization procedure to compute the overall friction response. The surfaces are assumed to be isotropic in nature. We employ this computational model to develop constitutive relationships for the friction force and coefficient of friction for Aluminum 6061 and stainless steel surfaces. We study the effects of various quantities such as surface roughness, material properties, normal load, and adhesive forces on the overall friction response. Our results show that the model is able to capture a wide variety of friction responses. Our results also suggest that the root mean squared (RMS) roughness of the surface alone is insufficient to describe the friction characteristics of a surface, and that an additional parameter is needed. We propose one such parameter, the aspect ratio, which is the ratio of the RMS roughness to the correlation length.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Tabor, D., 1981, “Friction—The Present State of Our Understanding,” ASME J. Lubr. Technol., 103(2), pp. 169–179.
Tabor, D., 1959, “Junction Growth in Metallic Friction: The Role of Combined Stresses and Surface Contamination,” Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A, 251(1266), pp. 378–393. [CrossRef]
Paslay, P., and Plunkett, R., 1953, “Design of Shrink-Fits,” Trans. ASME, 75, pp. 1199–1202.
Stembalski, M., Preś, P., and Skoczyński, W., 2013, “Determination of the Friction Coefficient as a Function of Sliding Speed and Normal Pressure for Steel C45 and Steel 40HM,” Arch. Civil Mech. Eng., 13(4), pp. 444–448. [CrossRef]
Buckley, D. H., 1977, “The Metal-to-Metal Interface and Its Effect on Adhesion and Friction,” J. Colloid Interface Sci., 58(1), pp. 36–53. [CrossRef]
Myshkin, N., Petrokovets, M., and Kovalev, A., 2006, “Tribology of Polymers: Adhesion, Friction, Wear, and Mass-Transfer,” Tribol. Int., 38(11), pp. 910–921. [CrossRef]
Richardson, R., and Nolle, H., 1976, “Surface Friction Under Time-Dependent Loads,” Wear, 37(1), pp. 87–101. [CrossRef]
Kato, S., Sato, N., and Matsubayashi, T., 1972, “Some Considerations on Characteristics of Static Friction of Machine Tool Slideway,” ASME J. Lubr. Technol., 94(3), pp. 234–247. [CrossRef]
Nolle, H., and Richardson, R., 1974, “Static Friction Coefficients for Mechanical and Structural Joints,” Wear, 28(1), pp. 1–13. [CrossRef]
Rabinowicz, E., 1971, “The Determination of the Compatibility of Metals Through Static Friction Tests,” ASLE Trans., 14(3), pp. 198–205. [CrossRef]
Greenwood, J., and Williamson, J., 1966, “Contact of Nominally Flat Surfaces,” Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A, 295(1442), pp. 300–319. [CrossRef]
Persson, B., 2001, “Elastoplastic Contact Between Randomly Rough Surfaces,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 87(11), p. 116101. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Persson, B. N., 2006, “Contact Mechanics for Randomly Rough Surfaces,” Surf. Sci. Rep., 61(4), pp. 201–227. [CrossRef]
Carbone, G., and Bottiglione, F., 2008, “Asperity Contact Theories: Do They Predict Linearity Between Contact Area and Load?” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 56(8), pp. 2555–2572. [CrossRef]
Paggi, M., and Ciavarella, M., 2010, “The Coefficient of Proportionality κ Between Real Contact Area and Load, With New Asperity Models,” Wear, 268(7), pp. 1020–1029. [CrossRef]
Manners, W., and Greenwood, J., 2006, “Some Observations on Persson's Diffusion Theory of Elastic Contact,” Wear, 261(5), pp. 600–610. [CrossRef]
Chang, W., Etsion, I., and Bogy, D., 1987, “An Elastic–Plastic Model for the Contact of Rough Surfaces,” ASME J. Tribol., 109(2), pp. 257–263. [CrossRef]
Chang, W.-R., Etsion, I., and Bogy, D., 1988, “Adhesion Model for Metallic Rough Surfaces,” ASME J. Tribol., 110(1), pp. 50–56. [CrossRef]
Chang, W.-R., Etsion, I., and Bogy, D., 1988, “Static Friction Coefficient Model for Metallic Rough Surfaces,” ASME J. Tribol., 110(1), pp. 57–63. [CrossRef]
Hamilton, G., 1983, “Explicit Equations for the Stresses Beneath a Sliding Spherical Contact,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C, 197(1), pp. 53–59. [CrossRef]
Zhao, Y., Maietta, D. M., and Chang, L., 2000, “An Asperity Microcontact Model Incorporating the Transition From Elastic Deformation to Fully Plastic Flow,” ASME J. Tribol., 122(1), pp. 86–93. [CrossRef]
Kogut, L., and Etsion, I., 2003, “Adhesion in Elastic–Plastic Spherical Microcontact,” J. Colloid Interface Sci., 261(2), pp. 372–378. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kogut, L., and Etsion, I., 2002, “Elastic–Plastic Contact Analysis of a Sphere and a Rigid Flat,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 69(5), pp. 657–662. [CrossRef]
Kogut, L., and Etsion, I., 2003, “A Semi-Analytical Solution for the Sliding Inception of a Spherical Contact,” ASME J. Tribol., 125(3), pp. 499–506. [CrossRef]
Kogut, L., and Etsion, I., 2004, “A Static Friction Model for Elastic–Plastic Contacting Rough Surfaces,” ASME J. Tribol., 126(1), pp. 34–40. [CrossRef]
Francis, H., 1977, “Application of Spherical Indentation Mechanics to Reversible and Irreversible Contact Between Rough Surfaces,” Wear, 45(2), pp. 221–269. [CrossRef]
Tworzydlo, W., Cecot, W., Oden, J., and Yew, C., 1998, “Computational Micro- and Macroscopic Models of Contact and Friction: Formulation, Approach and Applications,” Wear, 220(2), pp. 113–140. [CrossRef]
Longuet-Higgins, M., 1957, “Statistical Properties of an Isotropic Random Surface,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. A, 250(975), pp. 157–174. [CrossRef]
Longuet-Higgins, M. S., 1957, “The Statistical Analysis of a Random, Moving Surface,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. A, 249(966), pp. 321–387. [CrossRef]
Cartwright, D., and Longuet-Higgins, M. S., 1956, “The Statistical Distribution of the Maxima of a Random Function,” Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A, 237(1209), pp. 212–232. [CrossRef]
Nayak, P. R., 1971, “Random Process Model of Rough Surfaces,” ASME J. Lubr. Technol., 93(3), pp. 398–407. [CrossRef]
Bhushan, B., Wyant, J. C., and Koliopoulos, C. L., 1985, “Measurement of Surface Topography of Magnetic Tapes by Mirau Interferometry,” Appl. Opt., 24(10), pp. 1489–1497. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Whitehouse, D. J., and Archard, J., 1970, “The Properties of Random Surfaces of Significance in Their Contact,” Proc. R. Soc. London A, 316(1524), pp. 97–121. [CrossRef]
Pawlus, P., and Zelasko, W., 2012, “The Importance of Sampling Interval for Rough Contact Mechanics,” Wear, 276, pp. 121–129. [CrossRef]
Zavarise, G., and Paggi, M., 2007, “Reliability of Micromechanical Contact Models: A Still Open Issue,” Computational Contact Mechanics, Springer, Vienna, Austria, pp. 39–82. [CrossRef]
Zavarise, G., Borri-Brunetto, M., and Paggi, M., 2007, “On the Resolution Dependence of Micromechanical Contact Models,” Wear, 262(1), pp. 42–54. [CrossRef]
Pawar, G., Pawlus, P., Etsion, I., and Raeymaekers, B., 2013, “The Effect of Determining Topography Parameters on Analyzing Elastic Contact Between Isotropic Rough Surfaces,” ASME J. Tribol., 135(1), p. 011401. [CrossRef]
Sista, B., and Vemaganti, K., 2014, “Estimation of Statistical Parameters of Rough Surfaces Suitable for Developing Micro-Asperity Friction Models,” Wear, 316(1–2), pp. 6–18. [CrossRef]
Bush, A., Gibson, R., and Thomas, T., 1975, “The Elastic Contact of a Rough Surface,” Wear, 35(1), pp. 87–111. [CrossRef]
McCool, J. I., 1986, “Comparison of Models for the Contact of Rough Surfaces,” Wear, 107(1), pp. 37–60. [CrossRef]
Greenwood, J., and Tripp, J., 1970, “The Contact of Two Nominally Flat Rough Surfaces,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., 185(1), pp. 625–633. [CrossRef]
Hertz, H., 1882, “On the Contact of Elastic Solids,” J. Reine Angew. Math., 92, pp. 156–171.
Derjaguin, B., Muller, V., and Toporov, Y. P., 1975, “Effect of Contact Deformations on the Adhesion of Particles,” J. Colloid Interface Sci., 53(2), pp. 314–326. [CrossRef]
Muller, V., Derjaguin, B., and Toporov, Y. P., 1983, “On Two Methods of Calculation of the Force of Sticking of an Elastic Sphere to a Rigid Plane,” Colloids Surf., 7(3), pp. 251–259. [CrossRef]
MATLAB, 2010, Version 7.10.0 (R2010a), The MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA.
Bergström, D., 2013, “Rough Surface Generation and Analysis,” (last accessed Oct. 31), http://www.mysimlabs.com/surface_generation.html
Garcia, N., and Stoll, E., 1984, “Monte Carlo Calculation for Electromagnetic-Wave Scattering From Random Rough Surfaces,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 52(20), pp. 1798–1801. [CrossRef]
Cooper, M., Mikic, B., and Yovanovich, M., 1969, “Thermal Contact Conductance,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 12(3), pp. 279–300. [CrossRef]
Tajdari, M., and Javadi, M., 2006, “A New Experimental Procedure of Evaluating the Friction Coefficient in Elastic and Plastic Regions,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 177(1), pp. 247–250. [CrossRef]
McFarlane, J., and Tabor, D., 1950, “Relation Between Friction and Adhesion,” Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A, 202(1069), pp. 244–253. [CrossRef]
Dunkin, J. E., and Kim, D. E., 1996, “Measurement of Static Friction Coefficient Between Flat Surfaces,” Wear, 193(2), pp. 186–192. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Sum surface of two interacting rough surfaces

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematic of contact between the sum surface and a rigid flat plane under the action of both normal and shear forces

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

The von Mises stress contours in a linearly elastic-perfectly plastic asperity at three stages of its deformation: (a) no yielding, (b) subsurface yielding, and (c) surface yielding. In the areas corresponding to the lightest shade of gray, the von Mises stress has reached the yield strength of the material.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

The variation of the expected macroscopic (a) shear stress and (b) coefficient of friction with increasing normal load between the Al 6061 surfaces

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Total number of asperities and fractions of asperities undergoing different types of deformations changing with normalized separation between the Al 6061 surfaces, at different aspect ratios and RMS roughness

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

The variation of expected coefficient of friction with increasing normal load between Al 6061 the surfaces with three different RMS roughness values for σ/λ ratio = (a) 0.005 and (b) 0.01. Note that the three responses overlap.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Surface profiles of Al 6061 surfaces generated with different RMS roughness and aspect ratios

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

The variation of coefficient of friction with increasing normal stress for a stainless steel surface at three different RMS roughness values. The aspect ratio σ/λ is 0.005.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

The variation of coefficient of friction with normal stress between Al 6061 surfaces with three different surface energies at σ = 2.5 μm and σ/λ = 0.01

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

The variation of (a) normal and (b) shear stresses with separation between Al 6061 surfaces with three different surface energies at σ = 2.5 μm and σ/λ = 0.01



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In