Research Papers: Other (Seals, Manufacturing)

Impact Phenomena in a Noncontacting Mechanical Face Seal

[+] Author and Article Information
Philip Varney

Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering,
Georgia Institute of Technology,
Atlanta, GA 30318
e-mail: pvarney3@gatech.edu

Itzhak Green

Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering,
Georgia Institute of Technology,
Atlanta, GA 30318
e-mail: itzhak.green@me.gatech.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Tribology Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TRIBOLOGY. Manuscript received November 20, 2015; final manuscript received March 31, 2016; published online August 11, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Sinan Muftu.

J. Tribol 139(2), 022201 (Aug 11, 2016) (8 pages) Paper No: TRIB-15-1419; doi: 10.1115/1.4033366 History: Received November 20, 2015; Revised March 31, 2016

Noncontacting mechanical face seals are often described as unpredictable machine elements, gaining this moniker from numerous instances of premature and unexpected failure. Machine faults such as misalignment or imbalance exacerbate seal vibration, leading to undesirable and unforeseen contact between the seal faces. A hypothesis explaining the high probability of failure in noncontacting mechanical face seals is this undesired seal face contact. However, research supporting this hypothesis is heuristic and experiential and lacks the rigor provided by robust simulation incorporating contact into the seal dynamics. Here, recent developments in modeling rotor–stator rub using rough surface contact are employed to simulate impact phenomena in a flexibly mounted stator (FMS) mechanical face seal designed to operate in a noncontacting regime. Specifically, the elastoplastic Jackson–Green rough surface contact model is used to quantify the contact forces using real and measurable surface and material parameters. This method also ensures that the seal face clearance remains positive, thus allowing one to calculate fluid-film forces. The seal equations of motion are simulated to indicate several modes of contacting operation, where contact is identified using waveforms, frequency spectra, and contact force calculations. Interestingly, and for the first time, certain parameters generating contact are shown to induce aperiodic mechanical face seal vibration, which is a useful machine vibration monitoring symptom. Also for the first time, this work analytically shows a mechanism where severe contact precipitates seal failure, which was previously known only through intuition and/or experience. The utility of seal face contact diagnostics is discussed along with directions for future work.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Etsion, I. , 1982, “ A Review of Mechanical Face Seal Dynamics,” Shock Vib. Dig., 14, pp. 9–14. [CrossRef]
Green, I. , and Bair, S. , 1991, “ Dynamic Response to Axial Oscillation and Rotating Seat Runout in Contacting Mechanical Face Seals,” Tribol. Trans., 34(2), pp. 169–176. [CrossRef]
Lebeck, A. O. , 1991, Principles and Design of Mechanical Face Seals, Wiley Interscience, New York.
Burton, R. A. , 1980, “ Thermal Deformation in Frictionally Heated Contact,” Wear, 59(1), pp. 1–20. [CrossRef]
Kennedy, F. E. , and Hussaini, S. Z. , 1987, “ Thermo-Mechanical Analysis of Dry Sliding Systems,” Comput. Struct., 26, pp. 345–355. [CrossRef]
Roberts, W. H. , 1981, “ Tribology in Nuclear Power Generation,” Tribol. Int., 14(1), pp. 17–28. [CrossRef]
Steinetz, B. M. , Hendricks, R. C. , and Munson, J. , 1998, “ Advanced Seal Technology Role in Meeting Next Generation Turbine Engine Goals,” National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Lewis Research Center, Technical Report No. NASA/TM-1998-206961.
Etsion, I. , 1980, “ Squeeze Effects in Radial Face Seals,” ASME J. Lubr. Technol., 102(2), pp. 145–151. [CrossRef]
Etsion, I. , 1980, “ The Accuracy of the Narrow Seal Approximation in Analyzing Radial Face Seals,” ASLE Trans., 23(2), pp. 208–216. [CrossRef]
Green, I. , and Etsion, I. , 1986, “ A Kinematic Model for Mechanical Seals With Antirotation Locks or Positive Drive Devices,” ASME J. Tribol., 108(1), pp. 42–45. [CrossRef]
Ruan, B. , Salant, R. F. , and Green, I. , 1997, “ A Mixed Lubrication Model of Liquid/Gas Mechanical Face Seals,” Tribol. Trans., 40(4), pp. 647–657. [CrossRef]
Green, I. , 2002, “ A Transient Dynamic Analysis of Mechanical Seals Including Asperity Contact and Face Deformation,” Tribol. Trans., 45(3), pp. 284–293. [CrossRef]
Jang, J. Y. , and Khonsari, M. M. , 2000, “ Thermoelastic Instability With Consideration of Surface Roughness and Hydrodynamic Lubrication,” ASME J. Tribol., 122(4), pp. 725–732. [CrossRef]
Etsion, I. , and Harp, G. , 2002, “ A Laser Surface Textured Hydrostatic Mechanical Seal,” Tribol. Trans., 45(3), pp. 430–434. [CrossRef]
Etsion, I. , and Constantinescu, I. , 1984, “ Experimental Observation of the Dynamic Behavior of Noncontacting Coned-Face Mechanical Seals,” ASLE Trans., 27(3), pp. 263–270. [CrossRef]
Lee, A. S. , and Green, I. , 1994, “ Higher Harmonic Oscillations in a Non-Contacting FMR Mechanical Face Seal Test Rig,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 116(2), pp. 161–167. [CrossRef]
Harp, S. R. , and Salant, R. F. , 1998, “ Analysis of Mechanical Seal Behavior During Transient Operation,” ASME J. Tribol., 120(2), pp. 191–197. [CrossRef]
Zou, M. , Dayan, J. , and Green, I. , 2000, “ Dynamic Simulation and Monitoring of a Non-Contacting Flexibly Mounted Rotor Mechanical Face Seal,” Proc Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C, 214(9), pp. 1195–1206. [CrossRef]
Anderson, W. , Jarzynski, J. , and Salant, R. F. , 2000, “ Condition Monitoring of Mechanical Seals: Detection of Film Collapse Using Reflected Ultrasonic Waves,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C, 214(9), pp. 1187–1194. [CrossRef]
Reddyhoff, T. , Dwyer-Joyce, R. S. , and Harper, P. , 2008, “ A New Approach for the Measurement of Film Thickness in Liquid Face Seals,” Tribol. Trans., 51(2), pp. 140–149. [CrossRef]
Jiao, J. , Liu, W. , Zhang, J. , Zhang, Q. , He, C. , and Wu, B. , 2013, “ Time-Frequency Analysis for Ultrasonic Measurement of Liquid-Layer Thickness,” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 35, pp. 69–83. [CrossRef]
Huang, W. , Lin, Y. , Liu, Y. , Liu, X. , Gao, Z. , and Wang, Y. , 2013, “ Face Rub-Impact Monitoring of a Dry Gas Seal Using Acoustic Emission,” Tribol. Lett., 52(2), pp. 253–259. [CrossRef]
Zhang, Z. , and Li, X. , 2014, “ Acoustic Emission Monitoring for Film Thickness of Mechanical Seals Based on Feature Dimension Reduction and Cascaded Decision,” Sixth International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation, Zhangjiajie, China, Jan. 10–11, pp. 64–70.
Heshun, W. , Zepei, H. , and Chening, Z. , 2009, “ Fuzzy Recognition on the Working State of Noncontacting Mechanical Seals,” 2009 ISECS International Colloquium on Computing, Communication, Control, and Management, pp. 1–4.
Zou, M. , and Green, I. , 1999, “ Clearance Control of a Mechanical Face Seal,” Tribol. Trans., 42(3), pp. 535–540. [CrossRef]
Dayan, J. , Zou, M. , and Green, I. , 1999, “ Contact Elimination in Mechanical Face Seals Using Active Control,” 7th IEEE Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation, pp. 344–354.
Yelma, S. S. , Miller, B. A. , and Landers, R. G. , 2006, “ Clearance Regulation of Mechanical Gas Face Seals—Part II: Analysis and Control,” Tribol. Trans., 49(3), pp. 373–386. [CrossRef]
Zhang, H. , Landers, R. G. , and Miller, B. A. , 2010, “ Adaptive Control of Mechanical Gas Face Seals With Rotor Runout and Static Stator Misalignment,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas. Control, 132(4), p. 041009. [CrossRef]
Chang, W. R. , Etsion, I. , and Bogy, D. B. , 1987, “ An Elastic-Plastic Model for the Contact of Rough Surfaces,” ASME J. Tribol., 109(2), pp. 257–263. [CrossRef]
Minet, C. , Brunetiere, N. , and Tournerie, B. , 2011, “ A Deterministic Mixed Lubrication Model for Mechanical Seals,” ASME J. Tribol., 133(4), p. 042203. [CrossRef]
Green, I. , and Etsion, I. , 1986, “ Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of Noncontacting Coned-Face Mechanical Seals,” ASLE Trans., 29(3), pp. 383–393. [CrossRef]
Green, I. , 1989, “ Gyroscopic and Support Effects on the Steady-State Response of a Noncontacting Flexibly-Mounted Rotor Mechanical Face Seal,” ASME J. Tribol., 111(2), pp. 200–208. [CrossRef]
Green, I. , 1990, “ Gyroscopic and Damping Effects on the Stability of a Noncontacting Flexibly-Mounted Rotor Mechanical Face Seal,” Proc. Dyn. Rotating Mach., Honolulu, HI, Hemisphere Publishing Company, New York, pp. 153–157.
Green, I. , and Etsion, I. , 1986, “ Pressure and Squeeze Effects on the Dynamic Characteristics of Elastomer O-Rings Under Small Reciprocating Motion,” ASME J. Tribol., 108(3), pp. 439–444. [CrossRef]
Green, I. , 2008, “ On the Kinematic and Kinetics of Mechanical Seals, Rotors, and Wobbling Body,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 43(7), pp. 909–917. [CrossRef]
Varney, P. , and Green, I. , 2014, “ Nonlinear Phenomena, Bifurcations, and Routes to Chaos in an Asymmetrically Supported Rotor-Stator Contact System,” J. Sound Vib., 336, pp. 207–226. [CrossRef]
Sharoni, A. , and Etsion, I. , 1980, “ Performance of End-Face Seals With Diametral Tilt and Coning—Hydrodynamic Effects,” ASLE Trans., 24(1), pp. 61–70. [CrossRef]
Green, I. , 1987, “ The Rotor Dynamic Coefficients of Coned-Face Mechanical Seals With Inward or Outward Flow,” ASME J. Tribol., 109(1), pp. 129–135. [CrossRef]
Payvar, P. , and Salant, R. F. , 1992, “ A Computational Method for Cavitation in a Wavy Mechanical Seal,” ASME J. Tribol., 114(1), pp. 199–204. [CrossRef]
Bair, S. , Green, I. , and Bhushan, B. , 1991, “ Measurement of Asperity Temperature of a Read/Write Head Slider Bearing in Hard Magnetic Recording Disks,” ASME J. Tribol., 113(3), pp. 547–554. [CrossRef]
Patir, N. , and Cheng, H. S. , 1978, “ An Average Flow Model for Determining Effects of Three-Dimensional Roughness on Partial Hydrodynamic Lubrication,” ASME J. Tribol., 100(1), pp. 12–17.
Greenwood, J. A. , and Williamson, J. B. P. , 1966, “ Contact of Nominally Flat Surfaces,” Proc. R. Soc. London A, 295(1442), pp. 300–319. [CrossRef]
Varney, P. , and Green, I. , 2015, “ Rough Surface Contact of Curved Conformal Surfaces: An Application to Rotor-Stator Rub,” ASME J. Tribol., (accepted).
Jackson, R. L. , and Green, I. , 2006, “ A Statistical Model of Elasto-Plastic Asperity Contact Between Rough Surfaces,” Tribol. Int., 39(9), pp. 906–914. [CrossRef]
Jackson, R. L. , and Green, I. , 2005, “ A Finite Element Study of Elasto-Plastic Hemispherical Contact,” ASME J. Tribol., 127(2), pp. 343–354. [CrossRef]
Green, I. , 2005, “ Poisson Ratio Effects and Critical Values in Spherical and Cylindrical Hertzian Contact,” Int. J. Appl. Mech. Eng., 10(3), pp. 451–462.
Etsion, I. , 1982, “ Dynamic Analysis of Noncontacting Face Seals,” ASME J. Tribol., 104(4), pp. 460–468.
Zou, M. , Dayan, J. , and Green, I. , 2000, “ Feasibility of Contact Elimination of a Mechanical Face Seal Through Clearance Adjustment,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 122(3), pp. 478–484. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of an FMS mechanical face seal

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Reference frames used to model the FMS mechanical face seal

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Contact between two rough surfaces is reduced to that of contact between a rigid flat and a composite rough surface

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Validation versus the results provided by Green and Etsion [10]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Comparison of coned-face FMS minimum film thickness with and without contact (parameter set 1: γr=2 mrad, γsi=5 mrad, and n = 1000 rad/s). The “no-contact” case considers a surface height standard deviation σ=1×10−7m, which does not generate contact with these operating conditions. (a) Minimum film thickness, min(h(r, θ, t)) and (b) frequency content of steady-state FMS tilt γξ (similar frequency content is seen in γη).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Example contact pressure and fluid pressure profiles for parameters provided in the Appendix (n = 1000 rad/s): (a) contact pressure (Pa) Pc(r,θ,t) and (b) fluid-film pressure (MPa), Pf(r,θ,t)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

FMS response to heavy contact (parameter set 2: γr=1 mrad, γsi=5 mrad, and n = 2000 rad/s): (a) minimum film thickness, min(h(r, θ, t)), (b) frequency content of steady-state FMS tilt γξ (similar frequency content is seen in γη), and (c) angular orbit and Poincaré section

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Severe contact condition in a flat-faced seal. Parameters used are found in set 1 except for the coning, which is set as β = 0 (γr = 2 mrad, γsi = 5 mrad, and n = 1000 rad/s). (a) Minimum film thickness h(r,θ,t)/C0, (b) frequency spectrum of γξ, and (c) axial contact force, Fzc.



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In