The smart sandwich structures have been widely used in the aerospace, automobile, marine, and civil engineering applications. A typical smart sandwich structure is usually comprised of two stiff face skins separated by a thick core with variety of embedded sensors to monitor the performance of the structures. In this study, the smart composite sandwich structure (CSS) samples are fabricated with glass microballoons syntactic foam core and resin infused glass-fiber face skins (with piezoelectric fiber composite sensors (PFCS) embedded inside the resin infused glass-fiber face skins). One of the main concerns associated with embedding sensors inside composite structures is the structural continuity, compatibility, and interface stress concentrations caused by the significant differences in material property between sensor and host structures. PFCS are highly flexible, easily embeddable, highly compatible with composite structures and their manufacturing processes, which makes them ideal for composite health monitoring applications. In this study, in-plane tensile, tension–tension fatigue, short beam shear, and flexural tests are performed to evaluate the effect on strengths/behavior of the CSS samples due to embedded PFCS. Then carefully planned experiments are conducted to investigate the ability of the embedded PFCS to monitor the stress/strain levels and detect damages in CSS using modal analysis technique. The tensile tests show that both the average ultimate strength and the modulus of elasticity of the tested laminate with or without embedded PFCS are within 7% of each other. The stress–life (S-N) curves obtained from fatigue tests indicates that the fatigue lives and strengths with and without the PFCS are close to each other as well. From short beam and flexural test results, it is observed that embedded PFCS leads to a reduction of 5.4% in the short beam strength and 3.6% in flexural strength. Embedded PFCS’s voltage output response under tension–tension fatigue loading conditions has been recorded simultaneously to study their ability to detect the changes in input loading conditions. A linear relationship has been observed between the changes in the output voltage response of the sensor and changes in the input stress amplitude. This means that by constantly monitoring the output response of the embedded PFCS, one could effectively monitor the magnitude of stress/strain acting on the structure. Experiments are also performed to explore the ability of the embedded PFCS to detect the damages in the structures using modal analysis technique. Results from these experiments show that the PFCS are effective in detecting the initiations of damages like delamination inside these composite sandwich structures through changes in natural frequency modes. Hence embedded PFCS could be an effective method to monitor the health of the composite sandwich structures’ in-service conditions.

References

1.
Rabinovitch
,
O.
, 2007, “
Soft-Core Sandwich Panels With Embedded Rigid Inclusions
,”
J. Sandwich Struct. Mater.
,
9
(
1
), pp.
35
66
.
2.
Bozhevolnaya
,
E.
, and
Lyckegaard
,
A.
, 2005, “
Structurally Graded Core Inserts in Sandwich Panels
,”
J. Compos. Struct.
,
68
, pp.
23
29
.
3.
Abramovich
,
H.
, and
Piening
,
H. R. M.
, 2001, “
Actuation and Sensing of Soft Core Sandwich Plates With Built-In Adaptive Layer
,”
J. Sandwich Struct. Mater.
,
3
, pp.
75
86
.
4.
Shipsha
,
A.
, 2001, “Failure of Sandwich Structures With Sub-Interface Damage,” Ph.D. thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
5.
Burachardt
,
C.
, 1998, “
Fatigue of Sandwich Structures With Inserts
,”
J. Compos. Struct.
,
40
(
3–4
), pp.
201
211
.
6.
Joseph
,
F. R.
, and
Alfred
,
M. P.
, 2006, “
Failure Analysis of Composite Structures in Aircraft Accidents
,” ISASI 2006 Annual Air Safety Seminar,
Cancun, Mexico
.
7.
Charles
,
E. H.
, and
Mark
,
J. S.
, 2008, “An Assessment of the State-of-the Art in the Design and Manufacturing of Large Composite Structures for Aerospace Vehicles,” NASA Technical Reports No. 20040086015.
8.
Hansen
,
J. P.
, and
Vizzini
,
J.
, 2000, “
Fatigue Response of a Host Structure With Interlaced Embedded Devices
,”
J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct.
,
11
, pp.
902
909
.
9.
Warkentin
,
D. J.
, and
Crawley
,
E. F.
, 1991, “
Embedded Electronics for Intelligent Structures
,”
Proceedings of AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC 32nd Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference
, Baltimore, MD, pp.
1322
1331
.
10.
Mall
,
S.
, and
Coleman
,
J. M.
, 1998, “
Monotonic and Fatigue Loading Behavior of Quasi-Isotropic Graphite/Epoxy Laminate Embedded With Piezoelectric Sensor
,”
Smart Mater. Struct.
,
7
, pp.
822
832
.
11.
Murri
,
G. B.
, 2006, “
Effect of Embedded Piezoelectric Sensors on Fracture Toughness and Fatigue Resistance of Composite Laminates Under Mode I Loading
,”
Proceedings of American Society of Composites 21st Annual Technical Conference
,
Dearborn, MI
.
12.
Paget
,
C. A.
, and
Levin
,
K.
, 1999, “
Structural Integrity of Composites With Embedded Piezoelectric Ceramic Transducer
,”
Proceedings of SPIE Conference on Smart Structure and Integrated Systems
,
Newport Beach
,
CA
.
13.
Eaton
,
N. C.
,
Drew
,
R. C.
, and
Geiger
,
H.
, 1995, “
Finite Element Stress and Strain Analysis in Composites With Embedded Optical Fiber Sensors
,”
Smart Mater. Struct.
,
4
, pp.
113
117
.
14.
Chow
,
W. T.
, and
Graves
,
M. J.
, 1992, “
Stress Analysis of a Rectangular Implant in Laminated Composites Using 2-D and 3-D Finite Elements
,”
Proceedings of AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC 33rd Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference
,
Dallas, TX
, pp.
848
861
.
15.
Singh
,
D. A.
, and
Vizzini
,
A. J.
, 1994, “
Structural Integrity of Composite Laminates With Interlaced Actuators
,”
Smart Mater. Struct.
,
3
, pp.
71
79
.
16.
Ghezzo
,
F.
,
Huang
,
Y.
, and
Nemat-Nasser
,
S.
, 2008, “
Onset of Resin Micro-Cracks in Unidirectional Glass Fiber Laminates With Integrated SHM Sensors: Experimental Results
,”
Struct. Health Monit.
,
8
, pp.
477
491
.
17.
Ghezzo
,
F.
,
Starr
,
F. A.
, and
Smith
,
D. R.
, 2010 “
Integration of Networks of Sensors and Electronics for Structural Health Monitoring of Composite Materials
,”
Adv. Civ. Eng.
,
2010
, p.
598458
.
18.
Arnau
,
A.
, 2004,
Piezoeletric Transducers and Applications
,
Springer
,
New York.
19.
Ping
,
T.
, and
Liyong
,
T.
, 2001, “
Micro-Electromechanics Models for Piezoelectric-Fiber-Reinforced Composite Materials
,”
J. Compos. Sci. Technol.
,
61
, pp.
759
769
.
20.
Sodano
,
H. A.
,
Park
,
G.
, and
Inman
,
D. J.
, 2003, “
An Investigation Into the Performance of Macro-Fiber Composites for Sensing and Structural Vibration Applications
,”
J. Mech. Syst. Signal Process.
,
18
(
3
), pp.
683
697
.
21.
Schulz
,
M. J.
,
Sundaresan
,
M. J.
,
Ghoshal
,
A.
, and
Pai
,
P. F.
, 2000,
Active Fiber Composites for Structural Health Monitoring
,
SPIE
,
San Diego, CA
.
22.
ASTM D 5687/D 5687M-95
, 1995,
Standard Guide for Preparation of Flat Composite Panels With Processing Guidelines for Specimen Preparation
,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohacken, PA
, 15.03.
23.
ASTM D 3039/D 3039M-00ε2
, 2002,
Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials
,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohacken, PA
, 15.03.
24.
ASTM D 3479/D 3479M-96
, 2002,
Standard Test Method for Tension-Tension Fatigue of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials
,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohacken, PA
, 15.03.
25.
ASTM D 2344/D 2344M–00ε1
, 2000,
Standard Test Method for Short-Beam Strength of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials and Their Laminates
,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohacken, PA
, 15.03.
26.
ASTM C 393
, 2000,
Standard Test Method for Flexural Properties of Sandwich Constructions
,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohacken, PA
, 15.03.
27.
Doebling
,
S.
,
Farrar
,
C.
,
Prime
,
M.
, and
Shevitz
,
D.
, 1996, “Damage Identification and Health Monitoring of Structural and Mechanical Systems From Changes in Their Vibration Characteristics: A Literature Review,” Technical Report No. LA-12767-MS, Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico.
28.
Islam
,
A. S.
, and
Kevin
,
C. C.
, 1994, “
Damage Detection in Composite Structures Using Piezoelectric Materials
,”
Smart Mater. Struct.
,
3
, pp.
318
328
.
29.
Wahyu
,
L.
, and
Sathya
,
H.
, 1999, “
Health Monitoring of Structures: Multiple Delamination Dynamics in Composite Beams
,”
Proceedings of AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS SDM Conference
, pp.
99
1509
.
30.
Fritzen
,
C.
, 2005, “
Vibration-Based Structural Health Monitoring—Concepts and Applications
,”
Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Damage Assessment of Structures (DAMAS)
, Vol.
6
, pp.
3
18
.
You do not currently have access to this content.